News From
CONGRESSMAN DUNCAN HUNTER Member, House Committee on Armed Services Chairman, Subcommittee on Military Procurement "Proudly Serving the 52nd District of California" |
www.house.gov/hunter |
For Immediate Release: 1 February 1999
Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA), Chairman of the House Armed
Services Subcommittee on Military Procurement, responded to the release
of the President's budget today by pointing out that, according to the
President's own Joint Chiefs of Staff, our national defense will be underfunded
by $11 billion for Fiscal Year 2000, which begins in October.
"President Clinton is continuing his pattern of asking our soldiers
to do too much with too little," said Congressman Hunter. "We need
to increase defense spending by $23 billion just to meet minimum requirements."
Further, while the President's budget proposal claims to increase
defense spending by $112 billion over the next six years, it actually provides
only $84 billion. Compared to the more than $150 billion worth of unfunded
military requirements over the same period, the President's proposal is
short of what military leaders say they need by as much as $70 billion.
The gap in spending is caused by the Administration's expected inflation
savings from lower fuel costs and other optimistic economic assumptions.
FACTS ABOUT THE CLINTON/GORE DEFENSE BUDGETS
PRESIDENT'S FISCAL YEAR 2000 DEFENSE BUDGET
UNDERFUNDS MILITARY BY $11 BILLION ACCORDING TO PENTAGON