Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.),
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee,
On Judicial Nominations Hearing
June 11, 2008
Today, the Committee holds its sixth
hearing this year to consider President Bush’s nominations for
lifetime appointments to the Federal bench. It is the eighth
nominations hearing this year, and the 20th nominations hearing this
Congress. We will hear from four more judicial nominees— Paul
Gardephe and Cathy Seibel for the Southern District of New York,
Kiyo Matsumoto for the Eastern District of New York and Glenn
Suddaby for the Northern District of New York.
All four of these nominees have the
support of the New York Senators, who worked with the White House to
identify a slate of consensus nominees. I thank Senators Schumer
and Clinton for their consideration of these nominees. I also thank
Senator Schumer for chairing today’s hearing.
I noted the sudden concern of the Minority Leader last week over
district court nominations. Perhaps he did not have a chance to see
my statement from earlier in the week in which I said that with
Republican cooperation, we have the opportunity this work period to
confirm five nominees already reported favorably by the Judiciary
Committee. Of course, we continue to make progress. Just
yesterday, the Senate confirmed three of this President’s district
court nominees to the Federal bench.
Sadly, we have not seen much in the way of Republican cooperation.
Instead, anonymous Republicans are stomping their feet, objecting to
hearing after hearing and objecting to Senate passage of measure
after measure intended to help the American people. Yesterday,
Republicans objected to Senator Feinstein completing a hearing on
coercive interrogation techniques and the recent Inspector General
report on the role of the FBI. It was a good hearing and an
important hearing. It was conducted fairly and led to important
testimony and helpful analysis. It would have been cut short had
not the Majority Leader taken action and extended the lunch recess
of the Senate briefly so that we could complete it. As he did, the
Senate Majority Leader observed:
“By refusing to allow the Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on
interrogation techniques, Bush-McCain Republicans have today found
yet another way to cover for this Administration’s disregard for the
rule of law. This marks the second time in less than one week that
Republicans have needlessly wasted the Senate’s time, and is the
latest in a disturbing trend of Republicans looking the other way
from the Administration’s use of intolerable interrogation
techniques. I call on Senator McCain to condemn his colleagues’
efforts to stop the Senate from investigating torture.”
His reference last week was to the childish prank by which the
Republican leader refused to allow the global climate change bill to
be considered without first forcing the Senate clerks to read it
aloud, word for word for hours and hours and thereby effectively
shut down the Senate from action on it. Then, when it came time to
vote whether to move to consideration of the bill, the Republican
caucus voted to prevent progress on it.
This morning the now all too familiar pattern was repeated. The
Judiciary Committee was holding a hearing on the impact on real
people – on all Americans – of Supreme Court decisions that have
stripped protections for American consumers and workers. The hearing
began with the Ranking Republican Member noting how important it is
that we discuss these issues, and he was right. In recent
decisions, the Supreme Court has misconstrued our laws, ignored the
intent of Congress, and ultimately prevented state court juries from
providing redress for misconduct that has harmed ordinary
Americans. Then an anonymous Republican, without warning, objected
to the hearing being completed and prematurely shut it down in the
middle of Senator Whitehouse’s questions. As Senator Whitehouse
properly observed, it was a shame given that the women who had
traveled to Washington to testify had already been victimized by
insurers, medical device manufacturers and the courts and were then
today cut short by an anonymous Senate Republican. Republicans in
the Senate earlier this year blocked Senate action on a bill to
remedy one of these egregious Supreme Court decisions, that
involving Lilly Ledbetter, and now they will not even listen to
ordinary Americans who have been hurt.
These “objections” are selective in that Republicans are shutting
down hearings on topics on which they apparently do not want the
facts to become known. Republicans were apparently perhaps
concerned this morning that Americans will understand that “activist
judges” include those conservative Supreme Court Justices who are
misconstruing laws intended to protect American consumers. The
Chamber of Commerce witness had finished when our Republican
colleague preemptively insisted that the microphones be turned off
the microphones while ordinary Americans were trying to tell us
about the injustice they have endured.
It is sad and ironic that Republicans are acting as they are since
we are poised to make more progress of filling judicial vacancies.
There are three more nominations on the Committee’s agenda for our
business meeting tomorrow, including the nominations of Judge Helene
White and Ray Kethledge to the Sixth Circuit, and the nomination of
Stephen Murphy to the Eastern District of Michigan. This hearing
includes four more of President Bush’s judicial nominees to the
vacancies in New York.
As I said last week, with cooperation from across the aisle, the
Senate is prepared to confirm four circuit court judges and 11
district court judges before the July 4 recess, bringing the total
confirmed this year to 15 lifetime appointments. That compares most
favorably to the 17 district court judges confirmed during the
entire 1996 session, a session in which the Republican Senate
majority refused to confirm a single one of President Clinton’s
circuit court nominations.
I recall Senator Specter’s frustration when he was Chairman with a
Republican Majority at the end of the last Congress, and Republican
holds prevented the confirmation of 14 district court nominations.
Democrats on the Judiciary Committee had worked hard to expedite the
nominations at the end of the last Congress. At the time, Senator
Specter noted the serious impact that judicial vacancies can have on
the Federal judiciary. That is why, in stark contrast to
Republicans who increased vacancies during President Clinton’s
tenure in anticipation of a Republican president, the Democratic
Senate majority has worked steadily and steadfastly to lower
vacancies and make progress.
Last year, the Senate confirmed 40
judicial nominees. That topped the total achieved in any of the
three preceding years under Republican leadership. It was
also more judges than were confirmed in 1996, 1997, 1999, or 2000,
when a Republican-led Senate was considering President Clinton’s
nominations. Indeed, in the almost three years that I have chaired
the Committee, the Senate has confirmed 149 of President Bush’s
lifetime appointments to our Federal courts. That compares
favorably to the total of 158 confirmations during the more than
four years that Republicans led the Committee during this Republican
presidency.
Although Senate Republicans suggest
otherwise, we continue to make progress on judicial nominations.
On June 1, 2000, when a Republican Senate majority was considering
the judicial nominees of a Democratic President in a presidential
election year, there were 66 judicial vacancies. Twenty were
circuit court vacancies, and 46 were district court vacancies.
Those vacancies were the result of years of Republican pocket
filibusters of judicial nominations. Today, there are just 44 total
vacancies. If we can continue to make progress this month, the
current vacancies could be reduced to fewer than 40, with only nine
circuit court vacancies.
When Republicans were busy pocket filibustering Clinton nominees,
Federal judicial vacancies grew to more than 100, with more than 30
circuit vacancies, and it has been the Democratic Senate majority
that worked hard to reduce these vacancies, first when I became
Chairman in the summer of 2001, and again in this Congress. We have
gone from more than 110 vacancies to less than 45. With respect to
Federal circuit court vacancies, we have reversed course from the
days during which the Republican Senate majority more than doubled
circuit vacancies. Circuit vacancies have not been this low since
1996, when the Republican tactics to slow judicial confirmations
began in earnest.
Disputes over a handful of controversial judicial nominations have
wasted valuable time that could be spent on the real priorities of
every American. I have sought, instead, to make progress where we
can. The result is the significant reduction in judicial
vacancies.
Despite this progress, the heated partisan rhetoric and petulance
from the other side of the aisle might lead one to believe that
judicial nominations are the most pressing problem facing the
country. It is not. With Americans now facing increasing burdens
from the soaring price of gas, high food prices, rising unemployment
and a home mortgage foreclosure and credit crisis, with the
challenges of global climate change, the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and terrorism, the Republican efforts to create an
issue over judicial nominees is misplaced. In fact, I have worked
hard to make progress and have treated this President’s nominees
more fairly than Republicans treated those of President Clinton. We
have worked hard to reduce vacancies to the lowest levels in
decades.
I would rather see us work with the
President and make progress where we can than waste precious time
fighting about controversial nominations. I would also rather see
the Senate focus on addressing the real priorities of the country
rather than trying to create partisan advantage. Today’s hearing
for four more judicial nominations represents the progress we can
make when we work together.
# # # # #