Senator Patrick Leahy
Senate Appropriations Committee
Hearing On Priorities In The President’s Request
For Supplemental Appropriations For Iraq
Witness: White House Office Of Management And Budget Director Jim
Nussle
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
We have spent roughly $700 billion for the global war on terrorism,
and the President’s latest supplemental request would increase that
by roughly $108 billion. Overall cost of the Iraq War will soon
exceed an incredible one trillion dollars, which will go directly
onto the national debt, to be paid by the next generation.
Budgets are expressions of a government’s real priorities, and the
Bush Administration has consistently shown that its real priorities
are in Iraq, not here at home. The President and his supporters in
Congress find no inconsistency as every few months they demand
billions for Iraq – the biggest presidential earmark of all time –
even while here at home health care, education, housing, security,
infrastructure, and heating needs are shoved aside.
I am not saying that we should not be helping Iraq rebuild. As
chairman of the subcommittee that handles the Senate’s work in
drafting the budget for foreign assistance, I know the need for
funds for stabilization and reconstruction programs in Iraq. But I
also believe it is time we require the Iraq Government to begin
contributing a portion of rebuilding costs, especially when, with
the increase in the price of oil, Iraq is expected to end the year
with a budget surplus of $25 billion.
I hear every day from Vermonters struggling to make decisions
between putting food on the table and heating their homes, even
while food prices continue to rise and oil hits an all-time high of
$114 a barrel. We in Congress know what they are going through and
many of us are trying to help them, but again we find our hands
tied, as the President says he will veto any supplemental spending
bill that goes a dollar over his request – except, of course, for
the open checkbook he demands for spending in Iraq.
This war has cost Americans far too much – too much money, too much
damage to our alliances and influence around the world, and, most
importantly, too much death and too many maimed soldiers coming
home. We need a clear change of course in our priorities, and that
means also in our budget priorities.
State and Local Law
Enforcement Assistance Grants
Violent crime here at home has been rising, but the Administration
has dismantled front-line support for state and local law
enforcement here at home. Compare this with the Administration’s
view that no expense is too large for the hiring and equipment needs
of the Iraqi police force, on which we have spent nearly $21
billion, with questionable results.
It’s a different story for our own police departments, which have
been stretched thin for years as they shoulder both traditional
crime fighting duties and new homeland security demands. In what we
spend in just five days on the Iraq War, we could fully fund the
COPS Program at $1.15 billion and Byrne/ Justice Assistance Grants
at $1.095 billion. That alone would put 9,000 new police officers
on the beat to make our communities safer, and it would allow us to
shore up our multi-jurisdictional drug and gang task force efforts.
And during this National Crime Victims Week, I would ask the Bush
Administration to reflect on what its proposed cuts to the Crime
Victims Fund will mean to crime victims across this nation.
It is past time for this Administration to cooperate with Congress
and to get the real priorities of the American people straight. How
about if we start by asking Iraq to shoulder part of the burden of
its own law enforcement needs? After all, the major revenue source
for the Iraqi government is oil, which has risen dramatically over
the past year to more than $114 a barrel. Unlike us, the Iraqi
government actually is running a budget surplus! For a tiny
fraction of the money we spend each year on the Iraq War, we could
make our own towns and cities safer in practical, proven and
successful ways. Instead, the Bush Administration sends us a 2009
budget that cuts the help to state and local law enforcement
agencies by $1.6 billion – that is a staggering 64 percent.
# # # # #