Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.),
State, Foreign Operations Subcommittee,
Hearing On Fiscal Year 2009 USAID Budget
Request
March 4, 2008
Good afternoon. This is the first hearing of this subcommittee this
year. Senator Gregg and I share a strong interest in ensuring that our
foreign aid dollars are used wisely. There have been many examples of
when they have been, and many examples of when they have not been.
Iraq comes to mind as one example of how not to do it. If USAID had
been listened to earlier I think there would have been a lot less money
wasted. The Appropriations Committee will hold a hearing on the Iraq
reconstruction fiasco a week from today.
We also have concerns with the effectiveness of our programs in
Afghanistan and Pakistan, and countries that do not get much attention
where we should be doing more.
Today we welcome Henrietta Fore who is the Director of United States
Foreign Assistance and Administrator of the United States Agency for
International Development. That is a mouthful of a title. Ms. Fore, we
appreciate you being here.
Some say there is not enough time in an election year to accomplish
anything significant. I disagree. We have a lot to do and we should
make the most of the time we have.
Today we want to focus on the President’s Fiscal Year 2009 budget
request for the U.S. Agency for International Development.
There is much in the President’s request that I support. He proposes
higher levels of funding for Development Assistance than he has before.
These funds support USAID’s core programs that also have strong,
bipartisan congressional support.
For international health, the President proposes higher amounts for
HIV/AIDS, malaria and neglected tropical diseases. But, yet again, he
cuts funding for child survival and maternal health and for family
planning and reproductive health.
One of the President’s proposals is to recruit and train 300 new Foreign
Service Officers to begin to rebuild USAID’s professional workforce.
This is long overdue and I strongly support it. I and others called for
this years ago. Imagine how much farther along we would be today if OMB
had listened to us.
USAID’s professional staff is a shadow of what it once was. We
routinely hear that the reason USAID has become a check writing agency
for a handful of big Washington contractors and NGOs is because you
don’t have the staff to manage a larger number of smaller contracts and
grants.
Sometimes these big contractors do a good job, although they charge an
arm and a leg to do it. Other times they waste piles of money and
accomplish next to nothing, although they are masters at writing glowing
reports about what a good job they did.
Meanwhile, the small not-for-profit organizations are shut out of the
process. This is bad not only for U.S. taxpayers but also for the
countries that need our help.
When your predecessor testified here last year he had big plans for
reforming foreign aid, but he did not appear to have much of a grasp of
USAID’s budget and programs.
You come with considerable USAID experience. The best advice I can give
you is to focus on two or three key areas where you can make a real
difference to help make USAID a more accessible, responsive agency that
is not beholden to a select few.
I will stop there so Senator Gregg can make any opening comments.
# # # # #