U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee; Chairman, Sen. Charles Schumer; Vice Chair, Rep. Carolyn Maloney

WEEKLY ECONOMIC DIGEST: The Credit Crunch Migrates to Main Street

February 25, 2008

ECONOMIC NEWS: Signs of Economic Weakness Persist

Regional manufacturing activity continued to weaken in February, according to firms polled for the Philadelphia Fed's Business Outlook Survey. The Philadelphia Fed's February survey of manufacturing firms in the Third Federal Reserve District indicated weakening activity in the sector. After falling significantly last month, indexes for general activity, shipments, and new orders remained negative. Manufacturers' outlook for the next six months turned noticeably more pessimistic this month, with some future indicators turning negative for the first time since 2001.(See Chart) Rising food and energy prices boosted overall consumer prices, but core inflation held steady in January. The seasonally adjusted core consumer price index (Core CPI), which excludes changes in the volatile prices of food and energy, increased by 0.3 percent last month, following a 0.2 percent increase in December 2007. CPI-U, the overall CPI for all urban consumers increased 0.4 percent last month, following a 0.4 percent increase in December. The prices consumers pay for energy and food both rose by 0.7 percent last month. Over the past 12 months, the overall CPI has risen by 4.4 percent and the core CPI by 2.5 percent. New homebuilding remains weak. The number of building permits for privately-owned housing units fell by 3.0 percent last month to 1.048 million units at a seasonally adjusted annual rate. The number of January 2008 building permits was 33.1 percent lower than the revised January 2007 estimate. Housing starts in January were slightly higher than December 2007, but were 27.9 percent below starts in January 2007.

     

IN FOCUS: The Credit Crunch Migrates to Main Street

The credit crunch that began in July of last year has migrated from Wall Street to Main Street. Chaos in the market for auction rate bonds (ARBs) has resulted in unexpectedly high interest costs for municipalities and other agencies that used these securities to finance their debt. As a consequence, many cities will be forced to find alternative forms of finance. ARBs are slightly exotic financial instruments. The rates paid to bondholders are reset at periodic auctions, usually held at intervals of one to five weeks. The auctions are run by banks and investment banks that act as dealers. When dealers are unable to obtain bids for a resetting bond, the interest rate automatically resets to a penalty rate that is determined in the bond contract. Municipalities were attracted to the ARB market by cost considerations. When the ARB market was functioning smoothly, they could finance long term debt at rates below those paid on fixed rate bonds. Buyers of municipal ARBs, primarily institutions and high net worth individuals, were attracted by highly-rated, liquid assets paying attractive short term interest rates. The market for municipal ARBs began to come apart in February. Auctions for hundreds of resetting bonds have "failed" because there were no bidders. The dealers decided not to support the market. Interest rates on some of the failed bonds reset to very high penalty rates. For example, the interest rate on some New York Port Authority bonds reset to 20 percent. For other ARBs, the resets were much lower, which left those bondholders with low interest rate securities that no one was willing to purchase. This widespread disorder is new, but signs of difficulty in this market have been visible for some months. The interest rates for municipal ARBs vary over time, along with other short term rates. But the coefficient of variation for these rates, which measures the dispersion of rates around their average value, has been very steady historically, indicating that interest rate resets are not often extreme. This pattern changed at the end of 2007. (See Snapshot) The coefficient of variation, calculated from data from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, began to rise in 2007 and has moved up sharply since then, as a greater fraction of ARBs reset at relatively high rates. Increased volatility, followed by market implosion, is most likely a consequence of the ongoing credit crisis. Buyers may have panicked because municipal ARBs are guaranteed by the monoline bond insurers, whose credit ratings and solvency are suspect because of subprime exposure. The banks and investment banks who act as dealers have experienced losses of their own, and therefore have no desire to add unmarketable securities to their balance sheets. The result of this chaos is financial stress for municipal borrowers. The bond issuers who experienced high default resets will try to find other ways to finance their debt. Their options may be limited and costly, given the overall state of financial markets

THE WEEK AHEAD

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE

 
Joint Economic Committee Copyright 2007; Email Address: webmaster@jec.senate.gov; G-01 Dirksen Senate Office Building; Washington, DC 20510; (202) 224-5171