Welcome to GOP.gov  |  My GOP.gov  |   HOME
GOP.gov - House
            Republican Conference
Find it on GOP.gov
POPULAR SEARCHES
Putnam | Earmarks | Economy
Legislative Digest Press Resources Multimedia Helpful Resources Blog Issue Pages Ask the Conference Search Contact Us Login to My GOP.GOV
Article
UPDATED: TRUTH SHEET: Democrats’ False Claims on Iraq and the Economy


April 16, 2008

Democrat Claim

The Truth

Dems hitch economic downturn to war” (Politico, 1/29/08)

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA): "The war is the primary reason for this recession and we have to drum that home.” (Mother Jones, 2/29/08)

 

The “Iraq recession” fallacy – manufactured by a liberal economist – has been discredited by a number of experts, including other liberal economists.

Princeton University Economist and New York Times Columnist Paul Krugman: “An Iraq recession? One thing I get asked fairly often is whether the Iraq war is responsible for our economic difficulties. The answer (with slight qualifications) is no ... Overall, though, the story of America’s economic difficulties is about the bursting housing bubble, not the war.” (“Conscience of a Liberal,” 1/29/08)

Martin N. Baily, Former Chairman Of President Bill Clinton's Council Of Economic Advisers: “[T]he current problems the United States is facing [with the economy] have very little to do with the war in Iraq.” (The Washington Post, 04/15/08)

Amity Shlaes, Senior Fellow In Economic History At The Council On Foreign Relations: “Democrats and Republicans will both find the Iraq-as-budget-buster argument convenient. That doesn't make it compelling. It is also disingenuous. There are a number of reasons to oppose the war in Iraq. Just don't say we can't afford it.” (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 03/14/08)

Dean Baker, the co-director of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research: "There are lots of bad things you could say about [the war]. It didn't cause the recession … Baker also agrees with the president on the cause of the recession. ‘It's the housing bubble,’ he says, adding that there's ‘no ambiguity.’” (Mother Jones, 2/29/08)

Robert D. Hormats, Vice Chairman Of Goldman Sachs (International) And A Member Of The National Security Council Staff Under Presidents Nixon, Ford And Carter: “He said he thinks it would be hard to show that the Iraq war has caused oil prices to skyrocket or oil producers in the Middle East to falter, and he said he does not think there has been a closing-off of U.S. investment because of the war.” (The Washington Post, 11/13/07)

Senator Barack Obama “argued that the war … had contributed to higher oil prices. ‘When you’re spending over $50 to fill up your car because the price of oil is four times what it was before Iraq, you’re paying a price for this war,’ he said.” (Wall Street Journal, “Washington Wire,” 3/20/08)

False. Experts say rising oil prices are due to increased demand.

In February, Iraq produced an average 2.4 million barrels of oil per day, close to the peak pre-war level of 2.5 million barrels a day. (AP, 3/31/08, Council on Foreign Relations, 6/20/07)

Max Boot, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations: “In short, it is absurd to suggest that a lack of Iraqi production is responsible for the rise in oil prices; the likely culprits are increased demand in China, India, and other emerging markets.” (Commentary Magazine, 3/21/08)

Trilby Lundberg, editor of the nationwide Lundberg survey on the “essential causes” of high gas prices: "The essential causes are strong crude oil prices, dramatically higher ethanol prices and seasonally rising gasoline demand.” (Reuters, 4/6/08)

Democrat Leaders: “The current Iraq strategy … requires the United States to spend additional hundreds of billions of dollars despite urgent national needs in education, health care, and infrastructure improvement….” (Democrat Leaders’ Letter to President Bush, 4/4/08)

Funding for troops and operations in Iraq amounts less than 1 percent of our overall economy. By comparison, funding for World War II exceeded 34 percent of our overall economy.

Max Boot, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations
: “The overall size of our economy is $13.1 trillion. So the Iraq War is costing us less than 1% of GDP (0.91% to be exact) [“at $120 billion a year”]. Even if you add in the entire defense budget that still only gets us to roughly 4% of GDP—roughly half of what we spent on average during the Cold War, to say nothing of previous hot wars such as World War II (34.5% of GDP), Korea (11.7%), and Vietnam (8.9%).” (Commentary Magazine, 3/21/08)

Frederick Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute: “Defense spending as a percentage of total federal spending is now around 20 percent. In World War II, it ranged from 73 percent to 89.5 percent; in Korea it ranged from 32.2 percent (1950 — 51.8 percent in 1951) to 69.5 percent; and in Vietnam from 42.8 percent to 46 percent. In more context: at the height of spending on this war, defense spending was only 12.3 percent of all public spending (including federal, state, and local expenditures); in World War II the high was 82.1 percent; in Korea, 52.5 percent; and in Vietnam 31.3 percent.” (National Review, 4/7/08)