WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) issued the following statement
following the House passage of S. 900, the Financial Services Act of 1999.
"In
this financial modernization bill, it's painfully clear who the winners
and losers are. Banks, insurance companies and securities firms are big
winners, not surprisingly, since they were the ones negotiating at the
table with lawmakers. Losers are lower income communities and consumers.
"Here's
what the financial institutions get. They get to form huge corporations
that can afford to ignore families and small businesses down the street.
They get a weaker Community Reinvestment Act, which could result in a decline
in loans to minorities, small businesses and communities in need.
CRA has brought literally $1 trillion worth of loans into starving communities
since its passage in 1977, much of it the result of prodding by local community
and economic development organizations. S. 900 lowers the requirements
for CRA compliance and unnecessarily burdens the community based organizations
that are fighting for investment in their neighborhoods.
"The
financial conglomerates are winners because they get access to their customers'
most private, personal, medical and financial information which they can
use for any purpose without permission. When a widow receives the
benefit from her husband's life insurance policy, the insurance company
can share that information with its brokerage firm, which can then barrage
the grieving woman with stock offerings. The bank that gives you
a loan for you child's education can sell her address to a credit card
company which then entices her with a card at school. If your investments
have a bad day on the stock market or you make a claim against your health
insurance, then kiss that mortgage good-bye. Write checks to a psychiatrist
or oncologist and then just try to get a new health insurance policy.
"Why
should we be for this bill? What's in this financial modernization
for the senior citizens, or working parents in my district?
I'm here to protect and advance their interests, not the big banks, insurance
companies and securities companies. That is why I voted no."
|