Mr.
Speaker, I am a cosponsor and strong supporter of H.R. 1180, the Work Incentives
Improvement Act of 1999. Access to health care is important to all
of us. To persons with disabilities, it is critical. Unfortunately,
current policies penalize those persons with disabilities who are able
to work but, by doing so, lose access to Medicare and Medicaid coverage.
The
loss of health care is the major reason why persons with disabilities are
locked out of the workplace. According to the report issued last
fall by the President's Task Force on the Employment of Persons with Disabilities,
"(a)ccess to health care is accepted as the primary barrier to keeping
people with disabilities outside the world of work." While 72 percent
of persons with disabilities want to work and could be productive members
of the community, the loss of health care coverage keeps them from doing
so. H.R. 1180, as originally introduced, corrects this situation.
It would allow persons with disabilities to return to work and retain access
to a broad array of services.
The
bill before us today, however, is significantly different from H.R. 1180
as introduced. While I will support this version, I strongly urge
the conferees to improve the Work Incentives Improvement in order to bring
it closer to the provisions of the original bill. I am concerned
that, despite last minute negotiations, the bill does not provide full
funding to ensure that services will be available to Medicaid beneficiaries
who return to work. Because this bill has been rushed to the floor
with little chance for review and no chance for amendments, it has been
difficult to analyze fully the impacts of those funding sources that have
been identified. There are numerous ways to fully fund the Work Incentives
Improvement Act without taking funding from other essential programs.
I hope that the original provisions of H.R. 1180 will be restored in conference,
and that we find funding sources that do not jeopardize critical health
care programs such as school-based health care.
I
am also concerned that, just as we are working to help persons with disabilities
move into the workforce, the new 6.3% attorney tax will harm other persons
with disabilities receive their Social Security benefits. Legal representation
is critical in Social Security disability cases – it often makes the difference
between whether a person receives or does not receive disability benefits.
Taxing the attorneys who help persons with disabilities receive the benefits
to which they are entitled may mean that those persons never receive their
benefits. I believe that this is an unwise and dangerous provision,
and I hope that the conferees will eliminate it from the final bill.
We
can act now to give persons with disabilities the opportunity to be productive
members of their community. We can provide sufficient funding so
that those who move into the workforce receive comprehensive, quality health
care. And we can fund this major initiative in a manner that is fair.
I urge my colleagues to work for improvements in H.R. 1180 so that its
full promise will be realized. |