|
As children begin flooding the empty hallways of school houses across
the nation, the importance of providing them with the highest quality education
possible is again becoming a focal point.
Often, I am asked about my decision to support President Bush’s unprecedented
No Child Left Behind Act and if I think this initiative has hurt or helped
schools’ primary goal—educating our children.
The No Child Left Behind Act highlighted the most important issues that
can ever be discussed in the Congress—children and their education.
Education is not talked about enough, and is certainly not provided with
the appropriate funding to ensure this nation remains one of the most educated
countries in the world. Not only did the legislation bring education to
the forefront of national politics, it highlighted key issues such as additional
training for teachers, accountability in our schools, access to alternative
programs to enhance educational opportunity, and others that were rarely
discussed on the national level. In practice, the No Child Left Behind
Act was expected to bring full accountability into the schools while providing
adequate funding for the new accountability measures.
Unfortunately, the law is not adequately funded, leaving teachers to
meet standards without the funds they were promised. The President’s
budget for 2005 under-funded the law by $8 billion. Under his budget
2 million children will not get reading and math help, 1.3 million children
will not have after-school programs, and 56,000 fewer teachers will get
high-quality training that is needed to help our children succeed.
States and local school districts need the funding that was promised
two years ago when the law was enacted. Without adequate resources
teachers’ efforts to help students reach federally mandated progress levels
will be compromised. Additionally, I am concerned that the mandated
progress levels do not consider the special learning and instruction needs
of English as Second Language students, students that receive assistance
through special education, and other subgroups. Not considering these
students’ unique learning conditions may cause schools to be mislabeled
as failing or in need of improvement despite having shown steady and significant
improvement for all groups of students.
As your United States Representative, I will continue to vocally oppose
the underfunding of education and will actively support reforms that would
make No Child Left Behind Act stronger and more realistic. The future
of this country rests on the quality of education our children receive.
We must make a national commitment to education by strengthening our schools,
fully funding special education, and modernizing our classrooms. |
|