|
In November 2003, Congress created the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), intended to provide coverage
to 42 million elderly and disabled Americans who qualify for Medicare coverage.
I did not support this legislation because I think that we can do better
for our seniors. The bill contains language that actually states
the Federal Government shall be prohibited from negotiating with the big
drug manufacturers to bring down the high cost of medicine.
Implemented in January 2006, Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit
has been riddled with problems from the start and falls far short of an
adequate prescription drug benefit program promised by the federal government.
Many seniors will experience a large gap in coverage for necessary medications,
referred to as the ‘doughnut hole,’ during which beneficiaries pay their
monthly premiums for the prescription drug program, while paying the full
cost of their medications.
This is why, this week, I introduced the Medicare Doughnut Hole Elimination
Act of 2006, legislation which would allow beneficiaries to count both
prescription drugs that the insurance plan covers, called a formulary,
and non-formulary drugs towards both a plan’s deductible and towards the
Part D ‘doughnut hole.’ Currently, private insurance plans administering
the Medicare Part D program have a set list of prescription drugs they
will cover. Any drug not listed on the plan’s formulary will not
be eligible for coverage under Part D. Furthermore, these non-covered
prescription drugs are not counted towards overall out of pocket costs
for those plans offering a deductible and for the ‘doughnut hole’ coverage
gap between $2,250 and $5,100.
The legislation I have introduced would accurately account for a beneficiary’s
out of pocket drug expenses during the deductible and the doughnut hole,
not just the prescription drugs recognized by the individual insurance
plan. While I did not support the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement,
and Modernization Act of 2003, beneficiaries deserve access to medications
as promised by this legislation. I will work with my colleagues on
both sides of the aisle towards providing a meaningful prescription drug
benefit that does right by our seniors. Beneficiaries who are paying
tremendous costs for prescription drugs not included in their coverage
plan should have those out of pocket expenses be counted during the ‘doughnut
hole’ coverage gap that beneficiaries experience when they reach $2,250
in prescription drug expenses. Affordable access to life saving medications
should not be limited, and I will continue to work to ensure that all citizens
have fair access to the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit. |
|