WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today called on President
Bush to honor a government agreement with Smith & Wesson aimed at keeping
guns out of the hands of children and criminals.
Schakowsky
wrote that the Clinton Administration entered into an agreement with Smith
& Wesson where “the company agreed to make major changes in the design,
distribution and marketing of guns to keep guns out of the hands of children
and criminals.” In exchange, governments and local housing authorities
would give preference to Smith & Wesson products when making purchases
for their police departments.
Schakowsky
warned that gun manufacturers who opposed this agreement have already dropped
lawsuits in anticipation of the reversal of the policy by the Bush administration.
She urged the Administration to support and work with responsible gun manufacturers
to protect families from gun violence.
Below
is her letter to President Bush.
January
29, 2001
The
Honorable George W. Bush
President
of the United States
1600
Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington,
D.C. 20500-0003
Dear
President Bush:
I
urge you to maintain HUD’s agreement with Smith & Wesson aimed at keeping
guns out of the hands of children and criminals.
As
you know, under then Secretary Andrew Cuomo, HUD and many local and state
governments reached an agreement with America’s largest gun manufacturer-Smith
& Wesson-under which the company agreed to make major changes in the
design, distribution and marketing of guns to keep guns out of the hands
of children and criminals. In exchange, governments and local housing
authorities would give preference to Smith & Wesson products when making
purchases for their police departments. There should be no question
that this effort will reduce the gun violence that causes the deaths of
twelve children a day in this country.
Gun
manufacturers that opposed this program and refused to enter into similar
agreements promptly filed suit to block this initiative. Recently,
however, those gun makers have dropped their suit in anticipation of your
Administration reversing this policy and refusing to enforce the agreement.
One executive, Paul Jannuzzo of Glock, Inc, was quoted in the 1/6/01 Atlanta
Journal and Constitution as saying “In effect, it’s over.”
I
understand that we may have differing views over whether new gun control
laws are needed to stem gun violence. However, I do not believe there
is any debate that something has to be done to protect our families from
gun violence. Smith & Wesson has taken such action. We,
in turn, should be supportive. Purchasing our public safety equipment
from Smith & Wesson, and equally responsible gun manufacturers, ought
to be the first step in that support. Again, I hope that the industry
is mistaken and urge you to stay the course in reducing gun violence.
Sincerely,
Jan
Schakowsky
Member
of Congress |