CHICAGO,
IL – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), the top Democrat on the
Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection subcommittee, today joined Illinois
Public Interest Research Group (IL PIRG) in releasing the 2004
“Trouble in Toyland” report. Schakowsky is a leading Congressional
force behind strengthening current product safety regulations and has spearheaded
legislation to impose stricter federal protections and mandatory testing
of children’s durable products.
“The
information in PIRG’s
report will save lives. Families, during this Holiday Season,
will be armed with a critical tool as they shop for toys for their loved-ones,”
Schakowsky said. She added that “PIRG’s previous 18 reports have
resulted in more than 120 corrective actions by the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPCS) and toy manufacturers.”
Following
requests from Schakowsky, Congress finally held a hearing on toy safety
last month. Experts and parents, including Lisa Lipin, a mother who
has become a consumer advocate after her son was nearly strangled by a
yo-yo ball, testified about the critical need to expand and strengthen
the authority of the CPSC. CPSC has refused to ban the sale of yo-yo
balls in the United States even though it has received nearly 400 injury
reports.
Schakowsky
said that changing the culture of the CPSC is a top legislative priority.
“The culture of the CPSC is one that favors corporate profits over consumer
safety. The CPSC approaches product safety with caution and delay
– wait for a disaster before warning consumers. Unsafe and deadly toys
should never make it into our homes and into our children’s hands in the
first place.”
Schakowsky
concluded, “The real present we can give all consumers the next holiday
season is the guarantee that the products they buy are safe and secure.
We are not as safe until the CPSC becomes an agency with the authority,
funding and mandate that puts the interests of consumers ahead of corporate
profits.”
Below
is Schakowsky’s written statement:
STATEMENT
OF U.S. REP. JAN SCHAKOWSKY (D-IL)
RANKING
DEMOCRAT, COMMERCE, TRADE
AND
CONSUMER PROTECTION SUBCOMMITTEE
RELEASE
OF ILLINOIS PIRG’S 2004
“TROUBLE
IN TOYLAND” REPORT
NOVEMBER
23, 2004
Thank
you, Illinois PIRG and John Gaudette for releasing the 19th annual “Trouble
in Toyland” report; Nancy Cowles from Kids in Danger for your years of
service to consumer and child product safety; Lisa Lipin for your tireless
work in bringing to and keeping in the public spotlight the dangers of
the yo-yo balls; and Dr. Elizabeth Powell for helping explain the harm
the toys highlighted today can do.
The
information in this report will save lives. Families, during this
holiday season, will be armed with a critical tool as they shop for toys
for their loved-ones. We know for a fact that PIRG’s previous 18
reports have resulted in more than 120 corrective actions by the Consumer
Product Safety Commission, or the CPSC and toy manufacturers.
That
is a disgrace. It should not take a report by a watchdog group to
force the government to protect our children. Unsafe and deadly toys
should never make it into our homes and into our children’s hands in the
first place.
Unfortunately,
the culture of the CPSC is one that favors corporate profits over consumer
safety. The CPSC approaches product safety with caution and delay
– wait for a disaster before warning consumers.
The
yo-yo ball captures the culture of the CPSC. Yo-yo balls are dangerous
toys that remain on the market today, even though the government has indisputable
evidence that it must be banned. Here are the facts:
-
The
CSPC has received nearly 400 injury reports, including some where kids
were almost strangled to death;
-
yo-yo
balls have been banned in some European countries;
-
major
retailers have agreed to stop selling it; and
-
CPSC
Chairman Stratton has taken the toy away from children in his family.
But
the CPSC has issued only a warning stating that yo-yo balls present a “low
but potential risk of strangulation,” but refused to ban the toy.
That inept action fails to inform parents about the dangers of this potentially
deadly toy.
Most
people think that if a product is on the shelf, then it must be safe.
They believe the government is looking out for them and their children.
In fact, a 1999 Coalition for Consumer Rights’ survey in Illinois found
that 75-percent of adults believe that the government oversees pre-market
testing for children’s products; 79-percent believe that manufacturers
are required to test the safety of those products before they are sold.
For
most products, neither is true. In fact, there are no mandatory safety
standards for the majority of the children’s products being sold today.
Congress passed legislation in 1981 that prohibits the CPSC from establishing
mandatory standards in most cases. The bulk of standards that are
in place are “voluntarily” set by the very industries looking to make profits
and they are also expected to police themselves. There may be industry-set
standards in place, but there are no requirements that all potential hazards
are addressed in those standards, no requirement that products be tested
in the field or tested to ensure the standards are met before being sold,
and no consequences for the manufacturer if the standards are not met.
This
is true even for baby carriers, cradles, play pens, high chairs and other
items bought specifically for use by infants and children. Although
the CPSC requires no testing and manufacturers may or may not perform their
own tests, do not be mistaken, children’s products are tested. They
are tested in our own homes, with our children and grandchildren as test
dummies. The cost of those tests can be a panicked child, bruised
fingers, a near-strangulation, fractured skulls, or a dead child.
Unintended
injuries are the leading cause of death for children under the age of four.
As a leading expert on child product safety, Marla Felcher’s research reveals,
many of these deaths are because of unsafe products. And, as the title
of her book says, “It’s No Accident.”
It’s
time to reclaim our rights as consumers to be protected from hazardous
and harmful products. As the top Democrat on the Consumer Protection
Subcommittee, I pushed for a hearing on unsafe products, including the
yo-yo ball, and whether current safety standards for children’s products
were enough. We finally held that hearing in October and it confirmed
what all of us have been saying all along: We are not as safe until
the CPSC becomes an agency with the authority, funding and mandate that
puts the interests of consumers ahead of corporate profits. That
is one of my top priorities next Congress.
In
the meantime, I will be calling on CPSC chairman Stratton to push manufactures
to include registration cards with each product sold so consumers can be
contacted if the product is recalled and to encourage companies to engage
in “reverse marketing” campaign to reach consumer as quickly and as effectively
as possible once a decision is made to remove a product from the marketplace.
This
holiday season, parents have a tool, PIRG’s “Trouble at Toyland,” to help
protect their children. But the real present we can give all consumers
the next holiday season is the guarantee that the products they buy are
safe and secure. |