|
D.C. Scare
Prompts EPA to Review Rules on Lead
July 23, 2004
Friday
by D'Vera Cohn
- The Washington Post
The Environmental Protection Agency's top water quality official said yesterday
that a review of federal drinking-water regulations triggered by the lead
problem in the District is targeting several troublesome issues, including the
definition of "lead-free" plumbing materials.
Benjamin H. Grumbles, acting administrator for water, also told a House Energy
and Commerce subcommittee that the agency's national survey turned up isolated
lead contamination in school drinking water and concerns about inadequate
funding to do more testing.
Grumbles said he has heard no new information to change his previous statements
that the nation's drinking-water law is working well overall. Rep. Paul E.
Gillmor (R-Ohio), subcommittee chairman, agreed. "I am not convinced that this
situation demands that we need to make drinking-water utilities face tougher
standards," he said.
Some Democrats and environmental groups, as well as Sen. James M. Jeffords (I-Vt.),
want drinking-water rules to be tightened.
The EPA review was triggered by the disclosure this year that tests found unsafe
lead levels in the drinking water in thousands of D.C. homes. District residents
and officials complained that the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority had not fully
informed the public about the problem. The EPA has oversight responsibility for
WASA.
Officials at the city's two water treatment plants have begun adding a chemical
to protect against lead leaching from pipes, and WASA has committed to a
lead-pipe replacement program.
"The basic message is the numbers indicate that the [drinking-water] rule has
been successful, but there are some legitimate areas to look at . . . to see if
they can be improved," Grumbles said in an interview after the hearing.
Under questioning by Rep. Janice D.
Schakowsky (D-Ill.), who complained about loopholes in the
drinking-water law, Grumbles said a provision that allows plumbing fixtures to
be labeled "lead-free" even if they have up to 8 percent lead "is definitely on
the table to review and look at." Research has found that those fixtures can
leach measurable lead into drinking water, especially in newer homes.
Schakowsky also questioned why the
government requires water systems to replace 7 percent of their lead pipes each
year if testing finds excessive lead levels in the drinking water but allows
them to count some pipes as "replaced" if they pass a test for lead
contamination.
"That is one of the areas that we really want to look at carefully," Grumbles
replied.
Another area for review, he said, is what to do when tests find unusually high
lead readings, as happened in some D.C. homes and school water fountains.
Grumbles said the agency is considering a different approach to responding to
those high levels but did not go into details.
The EPA surveyed states about what they were doing to address potential lead
contamination in school drinking water because lead is particularly toxic to
children. The EPA does not require states to test school drinking water
regularly because it interpreted a 1996 court decision as prohibiting it from
doing so.
Grumbles said several states have taken additional actions to check school
drinking water, adding that some state officials "also indicated that it would
be difficult to expand programs beyond existing efforts because state
drinking-water programs are challenged by shortfalls in funding."
"We need to do more work on that front, and it needs to be a bipartisan
partnership" involving utilities, schools, lawmakers and others, he said.
In other testimony, representatives of two water-utility trade groups called for
an independent investigation by the National Academy of Sciences or a similar
organization into the causes of the D.C. lead problem, saying it would be
premature to rewrite drinking-water law before that.
|
|