June 12th, 2003
By Eric Krol
Daily Herald
President Bush sought
to break through years of political gridlock on providing better prescription
drug coverage for seniors during a Chicago speech Wednesday, with Democratic
critics saying the Republican plan falls short but acknowledging its momentum.
"We have an
unprecedented opportunity to give America's seniors an up-to-date Medicare
system that includes more choices and better benefits like prescription drug
coverage," Bush told the Illinois State Medical Society in an ornate ballroom
at the Chicago Hilton. "I'm here to urge Congress not to miss the opportunity."
If Congress can reach
consensus, the addition of prescription drug coverage and the option to join
lower-cost, managed-care insurance plans would be the biggest changes to
Medicare since the nation's health-care plan for seniors was begun nearly four
decades ago.
The changes also would
require seniors to navigate a new maze of health and drug insurance options to
determine whether the Republican plan working its way through the U.S. Senate
is right for them.
When help kicks in
The plan would require
seniors to pay for $275 worth of drugs before insurance kicked in. The
government then would pay for half of drug costs up to $3,450, but put the
entire burden on seniors until their prescription tab reached $5,300. At that
point, the government would pay 90 percent of any other drug costs. Seniors
making $19,766 or less as a couple would get more aid.
Bush illustrated the
problem of no Medicare drug coverage this way: the government won't pay the
$500 a year required for ulcer medicine, but will pay the $28,000 for an
extended hospital stay to treat an ulcer.
The president also
wants the carrot of the government picking up a greater share of prescription
costs if seniors join managed-care plans like PPOs and HMOs. But that incentive
isn't in the Senate plan.
The Senate plan also
does not include a House provision to charge wealthier seniors more.
U.S. Rep. Jan
Schakowsky, an Evanston Democrat who represents Des Plaines, argues the
Republican plan has a huge flaw: It doesn't require the drug companies to
negotiate lower prices with the federal government, meaning seniors still will
be paying inflated prices.
Schakowsky also said
the GOP version doesn't cover enough of the cost of prescription drugs, a
statement echoed by Gay Lee Andrews. The 74-year-old Elk Grove Village woman
and her husband, Ray, pay more than $10,000 a year for prescription drugs.
The seniors retired,
only to each return to two jobs after three HMOs they were in went belly-up and
drug costs mounted. Andrews said she and her husband would have to continue to
work because the Republican plan leaves a 100 percent gap for prescriptions
between $3,450 and $5,300.
"I never thought I'd
see the day when we'd have to scrimp and save to buy groceries," said Andrews,
who attended a small rally outside the hotel protesting the Bush plan.
Moving to approval
Other suburban seniors
will be watching to see what ultimately wins approval. Allen Goodridge, an
85-year-old resident of Friendship Village in Schaumburg, said he would be
interested in a prescription drug benefit -- if it beats the $40 per month he
now pays.
Walter Paquet of St.
Charles said he probably wouldn't be interested in managed care if it meant he
couldn't see his current doctor.
"I'd have to see
something showing how it'd benefit me," Paquet said.
Meanwhile, the Senate
Medicare plan continued to gather steam, with Senate Democratic Leader Tom
Daschle of South Dakota saying Wednesday he thinks it will pass. A Senate panel
is scheduled to vote on it Friday, and Bush hopes for a conclusion by July 4.
Bush, however, drew
the biggest applause from the room full of Illinois doctors when he called for
a $250,000 cap on pain-and-suffering lawsuit awards in medical malpractice
cases.
Congressman Philip M.
Crane, a Wauconda Republican, applauded the call, saying "we're going to keep
our doctors in this state by keeping their (malpractice) insurance down."
But Schakowsky, who
doubts the measure will get through the Senate, called the plan "mean spirited"
because it penalizes victims of doctor's mistakes.
Still, if Bush
succeeds in providing prescription drug coverage for seniors, he takes away a
key issue from Democrats in next year's re-election bid.
"I think it
dramatically enhances his re-election. It's a key campaign promise. It's a big
reform for Medicare. So for America's seniors, who increasingly rely on
prescription drugs for their health care, this is a big deal," said Congressman
Mark Kirk, a Highland Park Republican.
|