January 23rd , 2003
BY
KAREN
BERKOWITZ
Evanston Review
Parents of juniors and seniors at Evanston Township High School were
notified last week that the administration will release students’
names and other personal information to military recruiters unless
they receive a parental request to the contrary.
New revisions
to federal law require high schools that receive federal funds to provide
military recruiters, on request, with the names, addresses and telephone
numbers of juniors and seniors.
Furthermore,
the laws require that schools provide recruiters with the same, on-campus
access to students that they afford college representatives and prospective
employers.
Schools that
fail to comply with the recruiter-access provision face a cutoff of federal
education funding.
The new
mandates were written into the sweeping education reform bill known as the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and the National Defense Reauthorization Act for
fiscal 2002.
‘No Child Left Behind’
Disturbed by
reports that recruiters were being barred from some high school campuses, the
mandate was inserted into the No Child Left Behind Act by an amendment
introduced by U.S. Reps. David Vitter, R-La., and Pete Sessions, R-Texas.
Vitter was quoted in news reports as saying the practice of excluding
recruiters “demonstrated an anti-military attitude” that he found offensive.
The
Vitter-Sessions Amendment passed the U.S. House 366-57, with U.S. Rep. Jan
Schakowsky, D-9th, voting against it and U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk, R-10th, voting in
favor.
Federal law
also requires that parents be notified of the school’s intention to release the
information and be given an opportunity to opt out.
Under the
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, parents can request that their
students’ information not be released to third parties, including college
representatives and military recruiters.
Opt-out deadline
In a mailing
that went out Jan. 15, ETHS administrators notified parents of the requirements
and offered them the opportunity to submit written requests by Jan. 24 that the
information be withheld.
Said Assistant
Superintendent Denise Martin, “We also included a disclaimer that since the
(armed services) are a government agency, the ... information is available
through Social Security numbers or other sources.
“It’s possible
the military could obtain the information and it wouldn’t be coming from us.”
On Tuesday,
administrators announced the deadline was being extended to Feb. 28.
ETHS parent
Dickelle Fonda was dismayed that parents initially were given so little time to
respond.
“The letter
didn’t stop me in my tracks,” said Fonda, a draft counselor for the American
Friends Service Committee who requested last fall that her son’s name not be
given to military recruiters. “But for busy parents, that’s very little time.”
ETHS first
notified parents of the new requirements in the November-December issue of the
school’s parent newsletter. According to Kathy Miehls, director of public
information, the school received only nine written requests for omission from
parents or guardians in response to the newsletter item.
Martin said she
expects that in future years, parental notification will be incorporated into
the registration process prior to the start of the school year.
That’s
worrisome for Fonda, who fears the information could be overlooked amid the
many other papers and forms.
“I think there
are bugs to be worked out and I want to work with the school on this,” said
Fonda, who plans to suggest the school institute “opt-in” procedures rather
than requiring parents to opt out.
“It makes
children far too vulnerable to having their privacy rights violated,” said
Fonda, who believes there will be legal challenges to the requirement.
Evanston
Township High School has not maintained a student directory and has not
previously supplied names, addresses and telephone numbers to colleges,
employers or anyone else requesting the information.
Law tied to funding
The new
mandate, however, “was not something we could opt out of,” Martin noted. The
school receives $1.9 million annually, or 3.4 percent of its total budget, from
the federal government.
High school
administrators were notified of the requirements and regulations last fall in a
joint letter sent over the signatures of U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige
and U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The letter noted that
cooperation from schools is vital to sustaining the all-volunteer U.S. Armed
Forces, which has been in existence for the past 25 years.
“Providing this
information is consistent with the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act, which
protects the privacy of student education records,” assured the two members of
President George W. Bush’s Cabinet.
“Student
directory information will be used specifically for armed services recruiting
purposes, and for informing young people of scholarship opportunities. For some
of our students, this may be the best opportunity they have to get a college
education.”
Boon to recruiters
U.S. Marine
Capt. Peter Titterton, who supervises a military recruiting territory that
includes 350 high schools from northern Indiana to the Wisconsin border, said
the new federal requirement has been a boon to recruiters who visit high
schools periodically to meet with students.
“We are not
looking to butt heads with any schools,” Titterton said. “We are just here to
help their students take another career path. There are very few schools where
everyone goes to college.”
Titterton said
that in past years, recruiters sometimes encountered resistance when they
arrived at some schools and asked for lists of students.
“Now many of
them have it waiting for the recruiters when they arrive,” Titterton said. “In
the past, we've gotten lists of students from about 65 percent of the schools.
Since the new requirement went into effect, it’s been 85 percent.”
Particularly
helpful has been having the weight of the U.S. Department of Education behind
the effort, Titterton said.
“This is the
first time the U.S. Secretary of Defense and the U.S. Secretary of Education
have been operating off the same page of music,” Titterton said.
As a Defense
Department measure, “there was no way to enforce it; it was just coming down
the military chain of command,” the recruiter said. “Now with the No Child Left
Behind Act, it is coming down the education chain of command as well.”
Titterton
contended the measure is beneficial to the schools and many students, for whom
the military offers the best chance to obtain post-secondary education.
|