|
Dems' Iraq
Group Seeks Unified Message On War
By Hans Nichols
The Hill
February 10, 2005
House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) convened her “Iraqi working group”
yesterday, soliciting an array of views in formulating Democrats’ responses to
the successful election in Iraq and the expected supplemental spending bill for
the war.
The group consists of roughly 20 members and includes
lawmakers who supported the president’s authority to invade
Iraq and those who were fiercely opposed. Yesterday’s
meeting, which lasted more than an hour, was the first of the new Congress, but
the group typically gathers once a month, lawmakers and aides said.
Reflecting its divided membership, the group did not arrive
at a consensus on whether troop levels should be reduced or if the caucus should
support administration requests for additional money. But members of the group
said that they were unanimous in demanding greater accountability for how funds
— both American and Iraqi — are disbursed, especially in regards to
reconstruction money, according to lawmakers who attended the meeting.
There was also no consensus that Democrats should press the
Bush administration to clarify its strategy for success and to accelerate the
training of Iraqi forces. The disagreement on troop withdrawal touched on both
the political pitfalls of “cutting and running” as well as the policy
implications for the
Middle East
and the war on terrorism.
“There’s a disagreement on whether you should have a
withdrawal schedule,” said Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.). “I haven’t made up my mind
on that, and that’s not an easy question.”
“Let’s just say all views were represented,” said
Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), declining to elaborate on the closed-door
discussion. Before the meeting, he noted that the group represented a broad
array of caucus opinions. “If I am on it, they must have all views represented
because I voted for the war,” Berman said.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), a persistent critic of
the war, said she would seek to persuade her colleagues for a speedy withdrawal.
“There was no group consensus. This is not something
where we’re authorized to speak for the caucus,” said Rep. Jim Marshall (D-Ga.).
“The question is: What is their success strategy?”
said Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), the ranking member on the House Armed Services
Committee, as he emerged from Pelosi’s conference room.
Several lawmakers said that the discussion was a
blend of politics and policy, with some Democrats focusing on how to wound the
White House on a war many Democrats feel has grown politically unpopular. “The
politics and the policy? It’s all one ball of wax,” Skelton said.
But aside from the disagreement on any possible
withdrawal schedule, Democrats said they would demand greater accountability on
how the expected supplemental spending bill will be spent.
“What happened to the $9 billion in reconstruction
money that the CPA Inspector General can’t account for?” asked Murtha, citing a
report his staff received from the Coalition Provisional Authority in late
January.
He added, “There’s great distress that nobody knows
how this happened. I talked to [Ambassador Paul] Bremer on it, and he considers
it an accounting problem, and that’s how business is done, but I don’t know.”
“We have questions about the whole pot, including
Iraqi oil money,”
Marshall
said. He said that Democrats would question “the extent that Iraqis are wasting
their own funds, and what the overall effect of that is.”
Several lawmakers said they would pressure the administration
to accelerate the training of Iraqi troops.
“There is some common ground on the demand for
fiscal accountability, force protection and for helping troops out when they
come back home,” said Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas).
A complete list of members of the Iraqi working
group was not available, but the following members, in addition to those quoted
above, were seen entering the meeting: House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.),
Caucus Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Reps. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), John
Spratt (D-S.C.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) and George
Miller (D-Calif.).
|
|