WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today said the proposed
Republican funding plan falls well short of meeting our nation’s growing
housing needs. She joined Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary
Andrew Cuomo, Democratic Leader Dick Gephardt (D-MO), and other members
of Congress to urge opposition to the VA, HUD appropriations bill.
The
bill is $2.5 billion below the President’s request for HUD. It fails
to fund 120,000 rental assistance vouchers, cuts Community Development
Block Grant by nearly $400 million, and reduces elderly housing by $69
million.
“Congress
cannot turn its back on hard working families, especially at a time when
we can afford to help them meet their most basic needs. Our nation’s
sustained economic growth has created wealth for millions, but unfortunately,
many have been left behind. It is our duty and challenge to ensure
that we provide those families with the most basic needs, like a safe and
affordable place to live. This Republican funding bill falls well short
of meeting that challenge,” said Schakowsky, who is a member of the Banking
Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity.
Cities
like Chicago would lose millions of dollars for economic development, community
development, and housing assistance for seniors, persons with AIDS, and
the homeless, under the Republican plan.
“In
the City of Chicago, there are 35,000 families and seniors waiting for
housing. If they all joined hands, that line would be at least 26
miles long. This bill does nothing to shorten that line. In
fact it will add to it,” Schakowsky added.
Schakowsky
also expressed outrage at proposed amendments backed by the gun lobby.
The amendments would prohibit HUD from using funds to enforce, implement,
or administer the provisions of a settlement reached with gun manufacturer
Smith & Wesson. Smith & Wesson agreed to manufacture weapons
with child safety locks and to make changes in the design, distribution
and marketing of their guns to make them safer and to help keep them out
of the hands of children and criminals. In return, communities have
agreed to give preference to Smith & Wesson, or any manufacturer who
adheres to the HUD agreement, when procuring weapons for their local police
departments.
“This
measure is a brazen attempt by some members of Congress to do the gun lobby’s
dirty work, and that is to punish Smith & Wesson for agreeing to take
modest steps to protect our children and communities from gun violence.
It is also not a secret that this amendment is intended to send a message
to other gun manufacturers that they will face the consequences if they
settle with the federal government,” Schakowsky said.
“Those
with blind hatred for any common sense gun safety measures are endangering
the life and safety of Americans. This amendment is a clear example
of that hatred,” Schakowsky added. |