WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today participated in
a briefing organized by U.S. Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) on the
Biological Weapons Convention. Currently, the Bush Administration
opposes the establishment of a new inspection regime under the 1972 Biological
Weapons Convention. The September 11th terrorist and anthrax attacks have
renewed calls by many experts and public officials for mandatory inspections
under the Biological Weapons Convention.
Members
were briefed by Douglas J. MacEachin with Harvard University’s John F.
Kennedy School of Government and former Deputy Director of intelligence
at the Central Intelligence Agency, and Elisa D. Harris, former Director
for nonproliferation and Export Controls at the National Security Council.
Below
is Schakowsky’s statement.
“We
have all heard over the last several weeks about existing threats to the
United States and steps need to be taken in order to maximize prevention
and response capabilities. Of particular concern to the public and
members of Congress is the threat of biological weapons. Democratic members
of the Government Reform Committee have recognized the importance of this
issue for some time. The events of the last two months clearly make
today’s briefing even more important.
“One
ongoing theme we have heard from expert witnesses on the subject of preparing
for threats that exist to the United States is that we lack a clear understanding
of which threats are most likely to occur. Recent events underscore
the need for such an assessment.
“We
do know that biological weapons exist. We know that various states
have had and may continue to have biological weapons programs. The
threat of biological terror has become a reality for those of us on Capitol
Hill and elsewhere. The question is to what extent and how do we
best prepare for and attempt to prevent it.
“We
need to take some immediate steps. And I am glad that today we have
an opportunity to hear from experts about the significance of the Biological
Weapons Convention.
“The
United States must reengage and end its opposition to the establishment
of a new inspection regime under the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.
In July, the National Security Subcommittee held hearings on the importance
of this issue, and now it is certainly clear that we cannot afford to abandon
our efforts because of pharmaceutical industry concerns or difficulty in
enforcing international principles on non-proliferation of biological weapons.
“The
United States has not gone far enough in its efforts to engage the international
community on the issue of biological weapons production. Given the
current situation, it is imperative for this Administration to redouble
its efforts on this issue. There is no good reason to do otherwise.
The international coalition that the Administration has assembled in the
war on terrorism presents the Administration with a golden opportunity
to make some real progress on this subject.” |