DON’T RAID BENEFITS TO CUT TAXES FOR RICH
-- WE MUST PUT FAMILY NEEDS FIRST
By U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky
President
Bush was caught with his hand in the Social Security trust fund “borrowing”
money for his tax cut to the rich. According to figures released
by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the President’s tax cut
and a slowing economy will force the government to tap into the Social
Security surplus to the tune of $9 billion just to meet the budget shortfall
this year and $30 billion over the next four years. Even the President’s
so-called priorities, like additional money for education and defense,
can’t be funded.
For
eight years, the Democrats succeeded in bringing and keeping our nation’s
fiscal house in order. We enjoyed the longest sustained economic
growth in history and hundreds of billions of dollars in surplus that we
used to meet critical domestic needs, like hiring more teachers and putting
more cops on the streets. But in just eight short months, President
Bush squandered the surplus to cover the $1.7 trillion tax cut for the
rich -- and keep a campaign promise to his wealthiest contributors.
The biggest chunk of the tax cut, 43%, goes to the richest Americans.
Some individuals will benefit by millions of dollars. To name two
examples, Vice President Dick Cheney and Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill
will see income tax savings of $1.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
And under this tax cut, the top Bush administration officials, including
the president, will see more than $88 million in tax savings. All
the while, 21% of Americans will receive no tax savings whatsoever.
The
minute the tax cut was signed into law, it became impossible to fund many
vital programs and services and jeopardized others that our community has
fought to protect over many decades, including Social Security and Medicare.
In a CBS – Chicago Sun-Times poll, more than three quarters of Chicago
area voters said that preserving Social Security is more important than
the tax cut. Yet the rationale for the budget-busting tax cut was
that we had a huge “surplus” in the federal budget. That’s an odd
way of thinking. Would any American family say that they had a surplus
in their household budget if they had no health insurance or a decent roof
over their head, retirement security or couldn't afford to send their child
to college? Of course they wouldn't. But as an American family, that
is exactly what happened when the Congress passed the President's massive
tax cut.
It
is not too late to put family needs first. The Bush tax cut is a
gradual plan that is to be phased in over a decade. According to
Citizens for Tax Justice, four out of five taxpayers will receive most
of their tax breaks from changes that occur this year. After 2001,
more than half of the remaining tax cuts would benefit the wealthiest 1%
of the population. We should put the brakes on. There’s no
need to allow those tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy
to take effect until we've first met the needs of the majority of Americans.
That is why I will be introducing the Family Needs First Act that will
delay any additional cuts in the top income tax bracket (those making more
than $373,000 a year), and will impose a moratorium on the estate tax repeal
until we:
1.
can assure the American public that doing so will not jeopardize the Social
Security or Medicare Trust Funds or force cuts in benefits,
2.
add a comprehensive prescription drug benefit to Medicare,
3.
provide full funding to modernize schools and add 100,000 teachers, and
4.
significantly reduce the number of Americans with "worst case" housing
needs
No
rational CEO would decide it’s more important to give big bonuses to top
paid executives rather than invest in the business to make it prosperous.
We should have the same standard for the President running our country.
|