WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today joined a bipartisan/bicameral
coalition calling on President Bush to support embryonic stem cell research.
At a rally on Capitol Hill, Schakowsky and others spoke of the need to
federally fund this research that could be critical to curing the 100 million
Americans who suffer from juvenile diabetes, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s,
cancer, heart disease, spinal cord injury, ALS, as well as many other diseases
and conditions.
Following
the rally, Schakowsky attended a hearing in the Government Reform Subcommittee
on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources focusing on opportunities
and advancements in stem cell research.
Below
is Schakowsky’s Committee statement.
Thank
you, Mr. Chairman for calling this important hearing today about Stem Cell
Research. While the debate over whether or not federal funds should
be used for research has demonstrated itself to be an extremely controversial
subject here in Washington, it is clear that a majority of the American
public strongly supports embryonic stem cell research.
Stem-cell
research is a medical issue; one that I hope shall transcend political
lines and instead focus on human lives. One such life is that of
Carolyn Laughlin, the mother of two diabetic sons in my hometown of Evanston,
IL, who wrote me this past April to share her families struggles and urge
my support for federally funded stem-cell research.
She
wrote, “Diabetes haunts my family every waking hour. Injections,
blood testing, calculating food portions, are constant companions of my
sons. Overnight, I fear insulin reactions that will leave them unconscious.
Long term, we face concerns of kidney failure, blindness, and amputations.”
Most
scientists are in agreement that embryonic cell-research offers the greatest
hope to families like the Laughlins. The unique characteristics of
these cells could be critical to curing the 100 million Americans who suffer,
not only from juvenile diabetes, but Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer,
heart disease, spinal cord injury, ALS, as well as many other diseases
and conditions. We are on the thresh hold of not only saving lives
but dramatically improving the quality of millions of lives. We must
be cautious of closing doors that could realize that improvement.
Adult
stem cells have been incredibly instrumental in saving lives, as we can
see from some of our panelists. There are however, limitations on
the usefulness of adult stem cells when compared to embryonic stem cells.
Adult stem cells are difficult to obtain since they are often present only
in minute quantities. They are also much more difficult to isolate and
purify. Additionally, adult stem cells may have more DNA damage and
they have a shorter life span than embryonic stem cells, rendering fewer
cells. While it is important to continue working with adult stem
cells, it is vital to include embryonic stem cells in this field of research.
There is just not enough data currently to assume one stem cell source
is better than another. We do a grave disservice to millions of sick
Americans, as well as the millions who will develop these conditions in
the future, by prohibiting promising research from continuing in both directions.
I
additionally urge my colleagues to keep in mind the other implications
of not funding this research. Without public funding, scientist will
increasingly turn to private companies. Private companies restrict
the free flow of information, keeping their discoveries to themselves.
Without the free flow of information, we risk slowing down major advancements
in this field of research. We also risk losing our top scientists
to other countries. This has already been a result of the delayed
decision in continued funding. Yesterday morning, the newspapers
reported the decision of Dr. Roger Pedersen’s of the University of California,
San Francisco to move to Britain to work on embryonic stem cell research.
Last year, the British Parliament explicitly authorized research involving
embryonic cells, as well as the creation of embryos for research purposes,
for scientists who obtain permits. This action made Britain one of
the most permissive nations on embryo work, though teams in Australia and
Singapore have also aggressively pursued work on human embryonic stem cells.
Without federal funding, we risk falling behind other countries such as
Britain, Australia, and Singapore.
Finally,
we must remain aware, that science is moving quicker than we are legislating.
Last week we heard of both the development of embryos for research at the
Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine and embryo clones at the Massachusetts
biotechnology firm, Advanced Cell Technology. Federal funding guidelines
assure that research will meet ethical standards and allow advancements
to be made as quickly as possible. The Laughlins and millions of
other families are counting on us.
I
do have some questions about stem cell research as they are derived from
adults and embryos. I look forward to hearing from all of our witnesses
today and engaging in a worthwhile discussion on this subject. |