WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today said that consumers
in Chicago and Illinois are facing more bad news this winter. Schakowsky
said that customers in Illinois will have to pay 50% or more to heat their
homes with natural gas because energy companies are manipulating prices
and supply to maximize profits.
During
a Government Reform Committee hearing today on energy issues, Schakowsky
said that “this is simply about big oil and gas making business decisions
to maximize profit” and added that they “…[a]rtificially reduce supplies
and charge cartel-level prices.” She also displayed a copy of a July
mailing from a local distributing company warning customers that their
winter heating cost will dramatically increase.
The
Government Reform Committee will hold another hearing tomorrow where Secretary
of Energy Bill Richardson, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator
Carol Browner, and other Administration officials will testify.
Below
is Schakowsky’s statement from today’s hearing
“Chicago
and Illinois have been plagued by energy problems. Last summer, consumers
suffered because Commonwealth Edison could not serve the electricity needs
of its customers. This summer, my constituents were faced with the highest
gasoline prices in the nation. The arguments that the oil industry
made in an attempt to justify those prices somehow evaporated as soon as
members of Congress on both sides of the aisle asked for an FTC investigation.
The Administration was prompt to respond but many people, businessowners,
and farmers were made to suffer unnecessarily.
“As
we approach this heating season, we are facing more bad news. Prices
for natural gas – the fuel, which heats virtually every home in my district
and over half of all the homes in our nation, are soaring.
The November/December futures prices have more than doubled in the last
year. This spells trouble for homeowners, hospitals, businesses and
others who depend on natural gas.
“Once
again, the oil and gas industry is giving us excuses. They say that
they didn’t realize that demand would be so high; that they had to
cut back drilling because of environmental regulations; and that the federal
government is not giving them enough tax credits. And, once
again, their excuses don’t add up.
“It
is inconceivable that anyone in the energy industry could not know that
natural gas demand would be up. Even if the winter is mild, increased
demand from the electric utility sector is evident. Over the past
years, energy consumption has been steadily on the rise. Who did
the industry think would supply these plants? And, given this demand,
how did the industry think it would be able to meet its long-term contract
obligations and serve its core customers?
“Just
like this summer, pinning the blame on environmental protection won’t wash
either. According to Baker Hughes Inc., a Houston oil and gas service
company, there were 808 rigs drilling for natural gas, up from 561 at the
same time last year. This is not about environmental regulations.
Nothing has changed in terms of environmental protection over the last
year, but exploration is up 44%. This is simply about big oil and
gas making business decisions to maximize profits.
“By
their own admission, the industry purposely kept supplies low because prices
did not meet their profit goals. And some of the biggest winners
are Enron corporations, whose stock has nearly doubled this year, and El
Paso Energy corporation, whose stock has jumped 61% this year alone.
So once again, it’s not the industry that is going to be left out in the
cold this winter. It’s going to be families, seniors, and businesses
in my district and others.
“Taxpayers
already provide the oil and gas industry with massive tax breaks for exploration
and development -- $ 18 billion is the projected total for corporations
for the 1996-2002 period, and $1 billion alone in percentage depletion
and expensing provisions this year. How can we tell our constituents
that they are getting their money’s worth when these companies feel free
to artificially reduce supplies and charge cartel-level prices?
“Mr.
Chairman, there might be some who are saying this hearing is politically
motivated. I hope that is not the case. I hope we are serious
about this hearing because we owe that to our constituents.
I was not here when Congress decided to deregulate natural gas and crude
oil, but many of us outside of the beltway at the time had serious concerns
about those decisions. Many of us questioned the wisdom of turning
energy supply and price decisionmaking – decisions that affect every sector
of our economy and every person in our country – over to an industry whose
bottom line is their bottom line and not our economic interests.
I am glad that we have recognized that there IS a federal responsibility
to ensure that energy is available and reasonably priced.
“I
hope that we will really explore what the government should do to achieve
that goal and what the oil and gas industry should do and should
not do so that we can protect the public interest and our economy.” |