WASHINGTON,
D.C. – In response to Mary Anastasia O’Grady’s 8/23/02 “absurd”
column in The Wall Street Journal attacking members of Congress for working
to end human rights abuses in Colombia, U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky
(D-IL) wrote, “The Colombian government has the absolute right to wage
war against the brutal FARC guerrillas. My colleagues and I insist, however,
that Colombia must wage this war while upholding the law.” Schakowsky
added, “O'Grady used tired tactics and sloppy reporting to brand people
who defend human rights as enemy sympathizers.”
O’Grady
referenced a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell that was spearheaded
by Schakowsky and signed by a bipartisan coalition of House members.
In the July 23, 2002 letter to Powel, the members demanded that the Bush
Administration enforce US law by ensuring that the Colombian government
end human rights abuses.
Below
is Schakowsky’s full response to The Wall Street Journal.
August
30, 2002
Letters
to the Editor
The
Wall Street Journal
Dear
Editor:
Mary
Anastasia O'Grady used tired tactics and sloppy reporting to brand people
who defend human rights as enemy sympathizers in the absurd August 23rd
op ed, "Capitol Hill Leftists Side with Colombia Terrorists."
I
was particularly troubled by the quote from Colombia's Attorney General,
Luis Camilo Osorio, in which he attributes the human rights criticisms
of the Colombian military, which have been repeated time and time again
in reports by the US State Department, the United Nations, Human Rights
Watch and Amnesty International, as "a war to discredit the authorities,...
an international movement not only by NGOs but by some European states,
Sweden, Norway, France in the past and some groups in the U.S., including
some Democratic congressmen."
I
would like to remind Mr. Osorio that many of the forty-five signers of
the letter have been emphatic supporters of US aid to his own institution,
to the Attorney General's human rights office and the judicial system in
general. It just shows that funding does no good where there is a lack
of political will.
As
Colombia's highest-ranking law enforcement official, Mr. Osorio has the
duty to take seriously credible allegations of human rights abuses and
collusion with abusive paramilitary forces by members of the Colombian
Armed Forces. Instead of fulfilling those obligations, he has removed experienced
prosecutors from sensitive cases, forced the resignation of other dedicated
judicial personnel (including the two mentioned in the article),and imagined
a conspiracy behind those who remind him to just do his job.
I
stand by the assertions in the letter regarding the records of Generals
Rodrigo Quiñones and Rito Alejo del Río. No "low-level investigator"
found that Quiñones was guilty of ordering the murders of at least
57 people; it was the Office of Special Investigations of Colombia's Inspector
General. Quiñones appealed the decision; the case lapsed after frightened
investigators let a time limit pass without a decision. The case against
Del Río includes solid evidence, some from the general's own subordinates,
tying him to support for illegal paramilitary groups. President Pastrana
dismissed General Del Río and the United States government canceled
his visa. O'Grady gave a sloppy account of the events that led to the general's
arrest and release. The release resulted from a judge's controversial ruling
that human rights prosecutors cannot investigate generals, a ruling that
helps to ensure that human rights crimes go unpunished.
The
Colombian government has the absolute right to wage war against the brutal
FARC guerrillas. I agree with Ms. O'Grady's account of the atrocious recent
actions by the FARC. My colleagues and I insist, however, that Colombia
must wage this war while upholding the law.
That
means that the Colombian security forces must stop resorting to dirty war
tactics like aiding and abetting or tolerating the paramilitary forces
that commit the majority of the killings of
civilians
in Colombia today. Ties between members of the Colombian military and the
paramilitaries are extensively documented. What we demand is simple: that
those ties be broken.
As
to the spelling error, thanks for the correction. And by the way, Ms. O'Grady,
the geographic area you refer to is spelled Urabá, not Uruba.
Sincerely,
Jan
Schakowsky
Member
of Congress |