CHICAGO,
IL -- I am honored to be here today with so many distinguished panelists,
and to be a part of this year’s conference: “Democracy After Florida: State
Strategies To Expand Participation in Public Life.” I am grateful
for the efforts that you are undertaking every day to engage all Americans
in their government, so that they can actively shape the future of their
nation. Thank you for all that you do.
Let
me begin by making it very clear: The outcome of the 2000 election would
have been different if every vote cast had been counted and no voter was
denied their constitutional right to vote. Tens of thousands of ballots
from minority districts were thrown out; legal and lawful voters were turned
away on election day; registered voters were illegally purged from the
rolls.
Now,
more than a year later, I strongly view the frustration, anger, and resentment
felt by voters, and non-voters alike, throughout the nation as a positive
opportunity. It is an occasion to reengage the public in the political
process, not just on the federal or presidential level, but on state and
local issues, and to remind them that practicly every aspect of their life
is tied to decisions being made by elected officials in every state capitols
and on Capitol Hill.
I
am the Vice Chair of the Democratic Caucus Special Committee on Election
Reform. The Committee has held public forums in major cities across
the country, including Chicago. We heard from disenfranchised voters,
local elected officials, and community organizers about what really happened
on Election Day 2000. We know that history is doomed to repeat itself,
unless we are serious about taking action today to ensure fair and equitable
elections in the future. I believe we can reach that goal by,
first, expanding our nationwide grassroots voter registration drives. We
have made great strides in the past, including Motor Voter. After
a long struggle, which I am certain many of you were engaged in, citizens
are allowed to register to vote at the same time they apply for their driver’s
license. We’ve also seen states adopt same day registration and registration
by mail. I am particularly impressed by the efforts to register hard
to reach voters like new citizens, transit voters, and low income workers.
But
I know that you share my concerns that 36% of eligible African American
voters, 66% of Hispanics, and 94% of young people are not registered to
vote. And that only 40% of low income and unemployed voters are registered
-- those are the same citizens whose lives are directly impacted by decisions
made in city council, state houses, and Congress. By not voting,
the likelihood grows that stronger that those elected without these votes
will fail to address their concerns.
I
know that registering voters is a fight we fight every day, but since Florida
2000, great organizations like the NAACP and others have redoubled their
efforts to register young people, people of color, and working people.
There are great models in place today to register new citizens and efforts
spearheaded to reach potential voters in L stops, in grocery stores, on
the street, wherever and whenever. You are out there reminding potential
voters every day that they can’t go to the ball if they’re not invited,
and that their registration card is their ticket into the voting booth.
Second,
we must expand our voter education initiatives. Without voter education,
turnout on Election Day will still hover around 50%. That’s a failing
grade. No matter how many registration cards are filled out, the
voters must make the connection that their vote actually matters; the voters
must rise above their suspicions of government, and believe that, yes,
I am voting for stronger education, better services, access to healthcare
and for someone who represents my values and not those of the special interests.
Lani
Guinier in her book “The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness
in Representative Government” writes about Milagros Robledo, a Latino voter
from Philadelphia. He says:
“After
going through this whole thing, I now really know the value of my vote.
It means nothing to me, and it means a lot to the politicians.”
Mr.
Robledo should not be made to feel that his vote is worthless; that his
vote means less than others; that his vote has no value. He
should be made to feel that his government, his elected officials will
represent his interests and that he has the same rights as the any corporate
board member. But that only happens if he votes.
Finally,
once a voter is registered and educated, we need to make sure that the
voter’s vote is counted. Federal action to reform our election system
and to ensure that the protections spelled out in the National Voting Rights
Act are carried is just as important as voter registration and education.
Congress is in the process of setting national minimum standards to seriously
address the severe deficiencies that exist in today’s voting procedures
and technologies and ensure that no voter is turned away, shut out, or
discriminated against on election day. As you know, the House
and Senate each passed election reform legislation. Both bills contain
measures I support such as provisional voting requirements, federal funds
for new voting equipment, voter and poll worker education. However,
I join many civil rights and minority interests organizations in their
concerns that the photo ID requirement contained in the Senate bill, while
scaled back from its original version, still may have a “chilling effect
on low income voters,” (NAACP). I am also concerned that the standards
in the House bill do not go far enough to ensure that all voters with disabilities
have access to the polls and to guarantee that all machines notify voters
of undervotes and overvotes. Furthermore, the legislation does not
require states to provide adequate voting machinery to poor and minority
districts.
I
hope that Congress will deliver a meaningful and powerful election reform
bill. If we fail to take charge and bring about real reforms, votes will
not be counted and minority voters will be turned away from the polling
place. They will be unfairly targeted, and they will not be allowed
to fully exercise their constitutional rights. And without action,
persons with disabilities will continue to be denied access to the polling
place or will be denied the privacy guaranteed to others.
State
efforts to expand voter participation have helped lead the way to federal
reforms. But state advocacy organizations and state elected officials
have also understood that participation does not end in the voting booth.
Many
voters are excited about voting. Remember the first time that you
voted. For many of us, this was not just about being an adult – it
was being part of what we had learned in civics classes is an American
tradition and responsibility. Now, many of us – even those of us
who make a living out of politics – may wonder whether our vote really
matters, whether we can make a difference in a system that seems geared
to the special interests instead of the public interest.
This
year, at long last, Congress passed legislation banning soft money donations
to federal political parties. This is just one step in getting big
money out of politics. But more steps are needed.
That
is why groups like Public Campaign are fighting to win Clean Elections,
Clean Money campaign finance reform and why victories in Maine and Arizona
and Massachusetts were won with the support of so many allies.
Voting
is the most fundamental component of political participation. But
it is not the only one. We need people to be involved not just at
election time but between elections – when decisions are made that effect
their lives and their future. Electoral reform and campaign finance
reform together will encourage that participation by allowing the will
of the people – not the demands of corporations – to influence policy.
As
a federal legislator, I am committed to winning these changes at the national
level. And, as a federal legislator, I can tell you that federal
action is spurred, motivated and made more possible by victories at the
state level. In many instances, it is true: if the states
lead, the federal government will follow. |