WASHINGTON,
D.C. -- U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today said, “Even though
the Defense Department is responsible for half of the total discretionary
spending of the federal government, over $300 billion, they don’t have
enough respect for the American public to keep a clean set of books. This
is Enron accounting, ten times worse.” Schakowsky is the ranking
member on the Government Efficiency Subcommittee, which held a hearing
today on Department of Defense financial mismanagement.
Below
is Schakowsky’s full subcommittee hearing:
We
are here today because once again, the Department of Defense has failed
to produce a set of books that could be audited. Unfortunately, this
isn’t news. Even though the Defense Department is responsible for
half of the total discretionary spending of the federal government, over
$300 billion, they don’t have enough respect for the American public to
keep a clean set of books. This is Enron accounting, ten times worse.
I
find this particularly disturbing because the men and women who put their
lives on the line for this country are not the ones responsible for these
failures. It is the military bureaucrats at the Pentagon and around
the country who keep the books. If they are failing the American
public in this way, I wonder in what other ways they are failing those
men and women who are putting their lives on the line.
In
1995, the GAO put the Defense Department financial management on the high-risk
list. One of the issues raised then by the GAO was the failure of
the department to protect its assets from fraud, waste, and abuse.
Last week we saw just how vulnerable the Department is to fraud in the
area of purchase cards. Millions of dollars in personal items, trips,
and even plastic surgery were charged to government issued credit cards.
The
financial mismanagement continues at the Pentagon. Seven years ago
the GAO reported that the Defense Department was unable to reliably report
on the costs of its operations. Today that remains a problem.
Seven
years ago, the GAO reported that the Defense Department was not properly
reporting billions of dollars of future liabilities associated with environmental
liabilities. Today that remains a problem.
Seven
years ago, the GAO reported that the Defense Department was unable to protect
its assets from fraud, waste, and abuse. Today that remains a problem.
Twelve
years ago, the GAO reported that the Defense Department’s inventory management
was a high risk for failure. Today that remains a problem.
Twelve
yeas ago, the GAO reported that the weapon system acquisition was a high
risk for failure. Today that remains a problem. Unfortunately,
the list goes on and on.
We
have heard lots of talk, but we have not seen any progress.
As
I pointed out last week, the problem is not systems or training or organization.
It is the culture at the Department of Defense. The mission of the
department is critical to our safety and welfare. Unfortunately,
the bureaucracy has taken the importance of that mission and turned it
into impudence. These failures to account for the cost of programs;
to properly identify environmental costs; to protect against fraud are
not just the dry arcane stuff of accounting. These are examples of
how the Department abuses the public trust, wastes billions of dollars,
and in the process ask for more.
Today
we will hear again how the Department is going to correct these problems.
Frankly, I see no reason to believe those responses. Last July we
were told that the credit card issue would be addressed. Instead,
we got business as usual – fraud, waste and abuse. Why should we
not expect the same today? |