|
||||||
April 26, 2005 |
CONTACT: Kirstin Brost |
|||||
Obey Calls for Funding Necessary to Protect Our Borders Insists Administration Be Honest About War Spending House Votes to Agree, but Will They Follow Through?WASHINGTON - Yesterday, Rep. David Obey, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Appropriations, proposed a motion to improve border security and fiscal responsibility in the Emergency Supplemental bill. The motion instructed House negotiators to accept measures already passed in the Senate. One would increase funding to protect our borders with adequate border patrol. The second would ensure honest accounting by insisting the president include the cost of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in his annual budget. The House agreed to the motion last night by a vote of 417 to 4. The Senate agreed. The House agreed. It should be law. But first we must wait to see what the Republicans do in conference. “What will the Republicans do in conference when no one is looking, when no one is watching?” asked Obey. “Every single conferee voted to support these measures for border security and honest accounting. Was this just lip service?” “If the GOP is serious about fixing the holes in our border, they will see to it that Byrd’s amendments make it into the final bill. This money provides 1,050 trained, equipped border officials to ensure terrorists are kept out of our country.” “Unfortunately, some of my Republican colleagues have a long history of voting on both sides of the street when it comes to security. They claim border security is a priority then fail to provide enough funding to help keep us protected from terrorist attacks. They claim to be fiscal watchdogs then refuse to put the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in their budget.” “If the majority decides to ignore the vote cast yesterday, then what
they are really saying is that votes on the House Floor are meaningless.
Either the House Floor is a meaningful place or it is a sham, and the
real decisions are made behind closed doors, unseen by the press and
by the public. To go back on their word would be a further corruption
of the legislative process that is supposed to define the House of Representatives
as the greatest deliberative body in the world.” The History:
|
||||||
Committee on Appropriations Democrats | 1016 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 | (202) 225-3481 |