|
WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Chief Deputy Whip, announced
that she will vote against President Bush’s request for an additional $87
billion for his failed policy in Iraq.
Schakowsky
said, “The most galling part of this debate is that the Bush Administration
and Republican leadership are blackmailing members of Congress to vote
for this blank check with the threat of being accused of not supporting
the troops. Yet it is they who are guilty of sometimes tragically
disregarding troop safety and comfort and betraying our veterans.
We want the American people to know, in no uncertain terms, that there
are Democrats willing to stand up against this reckless and dangerous Administration,
and we want to reassure our colleagues that if they join us in voting no,
they will not stand alone.”
Schakowsky’s
statement from today’s Capitol Hill news conference is below:
“I
am proud to be standing with members of the United States House of Representatives
and citizen leaders – patriots all – who refuse to be “rubber stamps” for
President Bush’s failed policy on Iraq – who say NO to an $87 billion blank
check for an ongoing war and occupation with no end in sight, and no plan
to get there.
“Because
Americans awaken nearly every day to hear the name of another dead soldier,
and because at least another $1 billion is being borrowed every week to
finance this war of choice, we feel a weighty obligation to demand accountability
before another cent is authorized at this time.
“I,
for one, will not be an enabler to an Administration that clearly cannot
be trusted with our treasure, our lives, and those of the Iraqi people.
I say NO to $87 billion more until:
-
The
team responsible for this ill-advised war and its chaotic aftermath are
fired – starting, but not ending, with Sec. of State Donald Rumsfeld and
his assistant Paul Wolfowitz.
-
There
is a clearly defined plan that fully engaged the international community
and the United Nations in a decision-making role in the peacemaking and
rebuilding of Iraq, and includes an exit strategy for the U.S. and a realistic
proposal for Iraqi assumption of power.
-
Possible
war profiteering by private contractors like Halliburton (from whom Vice
President Cheney receives $13,000 each and every month) is fully investigated
and ended, and until Iraqis who have proven they can perform the work at
a small fraction of the cost and given many of the jobs. No to $6,000
telephones, no to $33,000 pickup trucks, no to $50,000 prison beds.
-
There
is a complete accounting for the $63 billion that was just appropriated
in April, plus an explanation of why the nearly $400 Billion one year defense
budget is still insufficient, and no until we are told how much more must
be borrowed and when.
-
U.S.
taxpayers’ needs for improved sewers, school buildings and electric systems
stop being sacrificed so that those taxpayers can bear the full cost for
newly built systems in Iraq and continue to award the wealthiest Americans
with huge tax breaks.
-
Our
troops are taken care of and force protection takes precedence over private
contractors as our first priority.
“The
most galling part of this debate is that the Bush Administration and Republican
leadership are blackmailing members of Congress to vote for this blank
check with the threat of being accused of not supporting the troops.
Yet it is they who are guilty of sometimes tragically disregarding troop
safety and comfort and betraying our veterans.
“I
personally have talked to mothers and relatives who are sending their soldiers
huge packages every week that include items like sunscreen, insect repellent,
shampoo and sanitary napkins. Worse, tens of thousands of our soldiers
were sent to war without modern body armor, quality boots, jammers that
block the signal between bombs and detonators. Many soldiers are
wearing jungle camouflage because there is not enough desert camouflage
to go around, and some may have chemical attack prevention suits with holes
in them. (Thank goodness they found no chemical weapons.) Mail
delivery has been slowed down by weeks due to civilian contractor no-shows,
and one-third of the 1st Armored Division’s Bradley vehicles are unusable
due to lack of spare parts, and overall 46% of the spare parts needed by
the Army are not available in Iraq.
“While
we can’t predict right now how many of our colleagues will join us in voting
no, there is widespread concern in the Democratic caucus over this supplemental.
But we want the American people to know, in no uncertain terms, that there
are Democrats willing to stand up against this reckless and dangerous Administration,
and we want to reassure our colleagues that if they join us in voting no,
they will not stand alone.” |
|