WASHINGTON,
D.C. – U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) today said that the so-called
School Readiness Act of 2003, H.R. 2210, is an attempt by the Republicans
to dismantle the “successful, time-tested Head Start program.”
The House unfortunately passed the Republican measure by a single vote.
Below is Schakowsky’s statement on H.R. 2210:
Ready
or Not
Mr.
Speaker, I rise today in support of Head Start and against H.R. 2210, the
so-called School Readiness Act of 2003. The only thing this bill
“readies,” is the dismantling of the successful, time-tested Head Start
program. I am an avid supporter of Head Start and have been since its beginning
in 1965 when I taught Head Start classes. The Head Start program
was founded on the basic principle that children cannot learn when they
are hungry or sick or when their parents are not actively involved in their
lives. Currently, this program serves only 60% of eligible pre-schoolers,
3% of eligible infants and toddlers, and 19% of migrant and seasonal farm
workers. Congress should be working to strengthen the program and
expand the ability of low-income families to access its benefits.
Instead, this bill does not even authorize enough funds for the program
to cover the cost of inflation.
There
is a major difference between what H.R. 2210 claims to do and what it actually
does. H.R. 2210 promises quality improvements by increasing teacher
credential requirements, but fails to provide any funds to increase teacher
salary or assist teachers in obtaining education. Head Start teachers
earn half of the average salary for kindergarten teachers—this bill allows
only for a modest raise. The bill increases teacher credential requirements—requiring
50% of Head Start teachers to have a B.A. by 2008—while decreasing the
amount of funds that are spent on training and technical assistance.
Further
placing the future of Head Start at risk, this bill would allow eight states
to replace their successful Head Start programs with other unproven pre-school
programs. At a time when our states are facing severe budget crises, this
bill would turn complete control of the program over to the states. It
allows states to set their own quality standards and to determine whether
or not they meet those standards. It guts the Head Start program—allowing
increases in class size, unproven curricula, and shorter programs that
do not provide the crucial nutrition, health, and social services children
need to succeed.
More
insidious than the full-frontal attack H.R. 2210 wages on Head Start is
the attack it wages on civil rights. H.R. 2210 repeals long-standing
civil rights protections to allow faith-based organizations to discriminate
on the basis of religion. The bill allows these organizations to use federal
dollars to practice discriminatory hiring policies. This is an assault
on two of our nation’s most fundamental principles: the separation
of church and state and equal protection under the law. The federal
government should never be in the business of permitting discrimination
nor should it break down the historic separation of church and state.
We
must stand up for our nations neediest. Head Start provides children
in difficult, often impoverished, situations the developmental tools needed
to give them a head start in their lives—an equal starting place in life
so they can catch up to their more fortunate peers. Children, and
their families, cannot afford the loss of any of those services.
We must reject H.R. 2210. |