WASHIINGTON,
D.C. – I want to thank you for inviting me today. I’ve had the pleasure
of working closely with the Transport Workers Union of America and I particularly
want to thank Roger Tauss for his guidance and help.
Brothers
and sisters, these are tough times. According to a recent Gallup
poll, 65% of Americans think the economic situation is “poor” – and they
are right. It is stunning to think about how the Bush Administration
has managed to turn a 10-year $5.6 trillion budget surplus into a $2 trillion
budget deficit – nearly an $8 trillion turnaround.
And
what do we have to show for it? Are we better off? No.
Not in terms of jobs. Since Bush took office, 1.8 million workers
lost their jobs. Not a single net private sector job has been created.
8.2 million Americans can’t find work. Many more have given up looking
and are no longer even counted in the statistics.
The
Bush record on creating jobs is a total disaster but no one in this Administration
seems to be very interested in turning that record around. In fact,
their major response has been to simply stop publishing monthly reports
of mass layoffs so that no one is reminded about what a horrible job they
are doing.
What
do we get as an economic stimulus plan from the President? A plan
that – by their own numbers – would create only 190,000 jobs this year.
In other words, the Bush job creation plan would create jobs for only 2.3%
of the 8.2 million men and women who are currently looking for work.
Why
is this plan so bad at creating jobs? Because it gives 40% of the
benefit to the top 1 percent. Under the Bush plan, a millionaire
gets $90,000 a year. Nearly half of all tax filers get less than
$100. I don’t know about you, but I don’t know any millionaires who
are putting off major purchases and need dividend relief before they are
able to go shopping. But I know plenty of laid-off workers, minimum
wage workers, working couples and senior citizens who would immediately
put money back into the economy if they had it.
The
Bush plan fails because it ignores the $86 billion in deficits facing the
states and would even add $4.3 billion to those deficits by cutting federal
taxes that also affect state revenues. I guess President Bush – who
may have forgotten that he used to be a governor – is unconcerned that
states will be shutting facilities, laying off workers, postponing investments,
and cutting services – actions that will only make our economic crisis
even worse.
After
9/11, we heard a lot from the Administration that we needed to provide
a $15 billion bailout for the airline industry, because the nation’s business
demanded air travel. We were so interested in helping the industry,
we couldn’t even stop to help airline workers.
But,
apparently, President Bush doesn’t think that investing in transportation
makes sense in terms of an economic stimulus policy – even though every
$1 of investment provides $6 of economic stimulus and every $1 billion
in federal highway and transit spending creates 42,000 jobs. I guess
it’s too obvious and direct a way to stimulate the economy to make its
way into the Bush proposal.
The
$8 trillion wasn’t used to create jobs. But not much of it was used
to take care of unemployed workers and their families – even though we
finally got the Bush Administration and the Republican leadership to agree
to an extension of emergency benefits, they refused to help the 1million
workers and their families who had already run out of the 13 additional
weeks.
The
$8 trillion also wasn’t used to make sure that no child is left behind
in education. The Bush budget is $7 billion short of what is needed
to fund last year’s education bill – schools are still crumbling and we
still don’t have enough teachers for our children. It wasn’t used
to make sure that families can afford to send their children to college.
With college tuition skyrocketing, Pell Grants will actually be cut by
$400 per student on average. It certainly wasn’t used to make
sure that senior citizens have affordable prescription drugs. And,
since it raids Social Security and Medicare, it certainly doesn’t help
there.
It
didn’t go to pay for a possible war in Iraq – those costs aren’t even factored
in yet. It also didn’t go to improve homeland security. This
year, we’re spending only about $1 billion in new money for homeland security
– last August, President Bush effectively vetoed a $5.1 billion in emergency
funds for first responders and froze existing funding in December.
The
fact is that the majority of the $8 trillion is going for tax breaks for
those who don’t need them. We are being told to tighten our belts
but the wealthy are gorging themselves at our expense.
It
is clear whose side the Bush administration is on when it comes to the
economy. It’s also true whose side they are on when it comes to other
issues. I don’t have to tell you, my brothers and sisters, that President
Bush is not on the side of working men and women. As a UNITE member
myself, I know that they are not only not on the side of organized labor
– they have positioned themselves firmly in the other camp.
In
the early days of this Administration, President Bush overturned a Clinton
executive order requiring that federal contract reviews include looking
at whether bidders had violated labor laws. President Bush refused
to sign a Department of Homeland Security bill until he was given full
authority to ban collective bargaining rights and union representation
for its workers – and reserve for himself the right to cut salaries and
benefits without appeal.
Ken
Lay is still at large, Harvey Pitt is still active at the SEC and companies
are still raiding worker pension funds, but the Bush Administration is
focusing on onerous rules requiring itemization of every union expenditure
over $2,000. The reason: to force unions to spend $1 billion
on unnecessary paperwork, $1 billion that can’t be used to organize, to
lobby against their anti-worker policies or to campaign for candidates
who will stand with labor.
CEOs
are now making 411 times more than the average hourly worker (up from 85
times that amount ten years ago), but the Bush Administration still won’t
increase the minimum wage, which – in real terms – is at its lowest value
in almost 50 years.
Corporations
are still stashing profits in Bermuda to avoid taxes, but whose patriotism
is attacked by Republicans? – firefighters, police, machinists, and
other union members. Tom DeLay is raising money not just for the
National Right to Work Foundation but for the GOP by falsely and unbelievably
charging union leaders with using 9/11 for their own advantage.
Clearly,
we are going to have many challenges in the 108th Congress and many opportunities.
The challenges will be many – stopping tax cuts for millionaires so we
can create jobs and invest in our nation; stopping the privatization of
Social Security, Medicare and air controllers; passing a real prescription
drug benefit and lowering prices for everyone; preventing more assaults
of unions like voluntary “comp” time and the Team Act.
One
of our greatest opportunities is TEA-21 reauthorization, an initiative
that will create jobs, spur the economy, and make long-term improvements
in business opportunities. I will be with you in fighting for at
least $60 billion, in protecting labor rights, and in preventing privatization.
We will not give up your members’ rights.
Brothers
and sisters, these are hard times and the Bush Administration is not on
our side. But I believe that the American public is on our side.
They want us to create more good jobs. They want to know that working
40 hours a week means that you get good wages and good benefits, with retirement
security through pensions, Social Security and Medicare. They want
affordable health care and quality education over tax cuts for the already-wealthy.
They want U.S. corporations to pay taxes in the U.S. They want to
be able to move around their communities and the country on safe and accessible
highways, mass transit, railroads and airlines.
Unfortunately,
having the public on our side is not enough. The President has a
bully pulpit that can only be countered by an education, organizing, and
mobilization campaign on a massive scale.
In
preparing to speak with you today, I learned that your motto is “United
– Invincible.” With that motto, with your skill and commitment,
and working in solidarity with all who share our goals, we will win.
I am pleased to be a partner with you in this fight. “United – Invincible.” |