House Democrats.gov - Real Answers. Right Now.
En Espanol
Site Map
Contact

Glossary
Search

HomeIssues in FocusYour InterestsState by StateNews and ViewsAbout Us

News & Views



The Big Picture

Jobs and Economy

Retirement

Health Care

National Security

Our Children's Education

The Environment


Online Vote

Do health care costs significantly impact your finances?


 

Yes

 

No

 

Not Sure



 
Print this pageEmail to a friend
 
July 25, 2005
CAFTA Deal Would Favor Select Few
By Rep. Sherrod Brown
Ohio, 13th
More about Sherrod Brown

An opinion piece by Rep. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, that was published in USA Today.

A prediction.

 

If the House of Representatives passes the Central American Free Trade Agreement, it will take place in the middle of the night, the normal 15-minute roll call will be extended to about three hours so that House leaders can twist arms, and the legislation will pass by one or two votes.

 

CAFTA supporters say the agreement will increase our exports. What they haven't said is the combined purchasing power of the CAFTA nations is equivalent to that of Columbus, Ohio. Or that an average Nicaraguan worker earns about $2,300 a year.

 

This agreement wouldn't allow workers in Central America to buy prime beef from Nebraska, or cars made in Ohio, or software from Seattle. These countries wouldn't be competing to buy our products, they'd be competing to make them.

 

When I was first elected to Congress in 1992, our trade deficit - the amount by which our imports exceed our exports - was $38 billion. Last year - after a decade of the North American Free Trade Agreement, China's Permanent Normal Trade Relations and a host of other trade agreements - our trade deficit has ballooned to $618 billion. More important, we have lost three million manufacturing jobs in the last five years.

 

Now congressional leaders and the president want to do more of the same. CAFTA, as other trade agreements, was negotiated by a select few for a select few. It builds in strong protections for U.S. pharmaceutical companies, but does nothing for American or Central American workers. It protects Hollywood films, but not the environment.

 

That's why the opposition to CAFTA is so wide and deep - Republicans and Democrats; small manufacturers and labor unions; family farmers and environmentalists; Roman Catholic bishops in Central America and Jewish, Lutheran and Presbyterian leaders in our country.

 

There is a better way. Trade policy should benefit also workers and small business, not only our largest corporations. Our trade agreement should protect the environment and food safety. Labor standards should be adopted to respect American workers and lift up workers in poor countries.

 

When the world's poorest people can buy American products, not just make them, then we will know that our trade policies are finally working.

 

Rep. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, is author of "Myths of Free Trade".

More Opinions >

Sign Up for D-Mail

Enter your email to receive issue updates from HouseDemocrats.gov and your representative.







Featured Member
Rep. Charlie Melancon
Already known for his tireless work ethic and hands-on approach, Melancon gained national attention for his leadership in the Katrina tragedy. In the days after the storm, Melancon worked around the broken federal system and coordinated delivery of over 100 tons of privately donated relief supplies by boat, plane and truck.

Related Links

American Voices

Do you have a story to share?

Is government making a difference in your everyday life? Do you or your community have a problem that government needs to solve?

We'd like to hear from you.

Share your story

Real Numbers
250 million

250 million children between the ages of five and fourteen work in developing countries – at least 120 million on a full time basis. (Human Rights Watch)


Print this pageEmail to a friend