Printer
Friendly Version
Click
here for audio of the Senator's speech
Click
here for video of the Senator's speech
Wyden
Says Congress Must Vote on Iraq
Lawmakers Need to Vote on President’s
Decision to Stay Until 2009
April 7, 2006
Washington – Today, Senator
Ron Wyden (D-OR) went to the floor of the Senate to call for a
vote on the President’s plan and budget for American’s
continued involvement in Iraq. Wyden, a member of the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence, cited the need for Congress to have
a role as a “co-equal branch of government” in the
future of the war-ravaged nation.
“I rise today to offer a simple
proposition: Congress should act like a co-equal branch of government
and vote on whether or not to keep American troops in Iraq for
at least three more years,” said Wyden on the Senate floor
today. “I simply ask the President to come to Congress and
describe his plan and his budget, in detail, and let us consider
its potential to succeed before we, with our silence, consent
to three more years of exceptionally costly involvement in Iraq.
That vote, if held, won't be about cut-and-run. It won't be about
who comes up with the best spin. It will be about holding the
President and Congress accountable. The vote will hold the President
accountable for presenting a plan and a budget for securing the
peace. And the vote will hold Congress accountable by making it
finally act like a co-equal branch of government.”
Wyden called for the White House
to bring a plan to Congress in the coming weeks. He said: “Just
as the President made the case to go to war, he owes it to Congress
and the American people to come to Congress and lay out his plan
and a budget for achieving a lasting peace in Iraq. Congress owes
it to the American people and the institution to vote. If the
President refuses to come to Congress in the coming weeks with
his plan and his budget to win the peace in Iraq, Congress owes
it to the American people to vote up or down on whether to keep
American troops in Iraq for at least three more years.”
Wyden outlined five concerns that
the President’s plan on Iraq should address. They include:
• How the President can help
make the Iraqis self-reliant so that they can defeat the deadly
insurgency;
• How the President intends
to help Shiite, Sunni, and Kurdish leaders break the political
impasse so that they can form a unity government;
• How the President intends
to pull the Iraqi people back from the brink of all-out civil
war and the specter of another Rwanda or Darfur;
• How the President intends to help rebuild the Iraqi infrastructure
and ensure that Iraqis have access to basic services like electricity
and clean water; and
• How the President intends to bring the troops home from
Iraq.
The Senator, who voted against authorizing
the use of force again Iraq in October 2002, cited the history
of the situation as a reason for deeper Congressional involvement.
“When the Senate voted in
October 2002 to send troops to Iraq, few Americans believed then
that the US military would be in Iraq in 2006, let alone 2009,
or beyond. Based on what the Bush Administration said then, Americans
would be justified in thinking that by now, Iraq would be free
and democratic. Based on what the Bush Administration said then,
Americans would be justified in thinking that by now, Iraq would
be stable and self-supporting. Based on what the Bush Administration
said then, Americans would be justified in thinking that by now,
the vast majority of US forces, if not all of them, would be safely
back home. Unfortunately, the rosy forecast put out by the White
House and the Pentagon in 2002, perished in the harsh reality
of Iraq.”
# #
#