Printer
Friendly Version
Wyden Testifies Before BRAC Commission
Senator opposes plans to realign 142nd Fighter
Wing at Portland Air Base
Click
here for more comments on the base closure
June 17, 2005
Portland, OR – U.S. Senator
Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) testified today before the Defense Base Closure
and Realignment (BRAC) Commission regarding the potential dangers
of proposed changes to the 142nd Fighter Wing at Portland Air
Base. Wyden was joined by fellow Oregon leaders and various military
experts in opposing a Pentagon plan to realign the Wing by moving
all but two alert fighter jets out of Portland; that move would
severely compromise the security of Oregon and the entire Northwest.
The BRAC Commission is currently
considering Defense Department proposals for base closures and
realignments across the country. They are expected to make their
recommendations to the President in September of this year.
Senator Wyden’s prepared
testimony follows:
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden
Prepared Testimony before the Defense Base Closure and Realignment
Commission
June 17, 2005
Good morning and welcome to
Oregon. Thank you, Chairman Principi and Commissioners Hansen,
Coyle and Bilbray for your patriotism and your service. You all
will have plenty of welts on your back when you are done trekking
around the country on this mission.
As you travel across America,
more often than not, the local Congress people will come out to
say that if this base, or that installation, in their neighborhood
is closed, well, Western Civilization will pretty much come to
an end.
I won’t say that. But
I am going to try to convince you that the initial recommendations
for the Portland Air Base will leave the airspace over the Pacific
Northwest uniquely isolated, dangerously unprepared, and virtually
defenseless if the enemy chooses to attack this corner of the
homeland from the air. These recommendations defy common sense.
Here’s why:
The first map you see demonstrates
how the 142nd Fighter Wing currently patrols and protects the
Pacific Northwest.
The second map shows how vulnerable
the Northwest will be if our region is left with just two alert
fighters.
After removing most of the
fighters to Atlantic City and New Orleans, the Pentagon’s
proposal would make it impossible for the region to respond if
a large scale attack or multiple simultaneous attacks are launched
here.
Under the Defense Department’s
plan, it would take additional alert fighters hours to arrive
from elsewhere, refuel, and begin responding to any aggression.
It’s naïve to act
as though our enemies will come at us one at a time. Yet the Pentagon
plan seems predicated on that very hope.
I would also like to point
out that this sacrifice of the region’s security is being
proposed with a plan that moves most of the fighters to a facility
with a lower military value, at a cost to the taxpayers.
If the goal of the BRAC Commission
is to save dollars, let’s look at it that way. Sharp-pencil
accounting alone provides a plethora of reasons to reject the
Pentagon’s recommendations. The Secretary’s plan for
the Northwest simply fails to meet the fundamental goal of saving
taxpayer dollars
I’m on the Senate Budget
Committee as well, and let me tell you now: there aren’t
dollars to spare on sloppy financial management when the whole
goal of this process is to keep from breaking the bank. This country
can’t afford to move bases and units at a loss.
This plan would move the 142nd
at a loss. The proposal for the 939th Air Refueling Wing is another
poor fiscal decision.
This Wing is in the last phase
of a long-term transformation that has already cost the Air Force
more than $60 million. Secretary Rumsfeld’s plan would throw
away this investment just to move the Wing.
He admits that his plan would
cost so much that the Air Force wouldn’t break even for
seven years. At a maximum, the plan would save only $42 million
in ten years.
Scrapping a $60 million investment
in an attempt to save $42 million simply doesn’t make sense.
This proposal will waste, not save, taxpayer dollars.
Other witnesses will be testifying
on these issues today, so I won’t dwell on them, but I encourage
you to keep your green eyeshades on as you examine the Pentagon’s
plan.
And lastly, I want to conclude
by saying that at the end of the day, this is not just about maps,
or charts, or dollars: it’s about people.
Not long ago Oregonians woke
up to this headline in the local paper: “War’s Toll
Far Worse on Oregon.” At the end of 2004, the death rate
for Oregon National Guard members in Iraq was nearly three times
that of the National Guard as a whole. In the first six months
of 2005 our state has lost three more Guard members.
At a time when Oregonians are
being asked to make a disproportionately high sacrifice of lives
in Iraq, and in the face of the Pentagon’s recommendations
that simply defy common sense, I strongly encourage the Commission
to reject the Pentagon’s recommendations.
###