Printer
Friendly Version
WYDEN: FIRST SUITS UNDER CAN-SPAM GOOD NEWS FOR OREGON E-MAIL
USERS
Internet Service Providers announce
civil action against alleged violators
March 10, 2004
Washington, DC - U.S. Senator
Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) today applauded the announcement by major
Internet service providers (ISPs) of six lawsuits against alleged
violators of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Wyden, with U.S. Senator
Conrad Burns (R-Mont.), wrote the first-ever Federal anti-spam
law to protect Oregonians and all Internet users from unsolicited
and often offensive e-mail. America Online, Earthlink, Microsoft
and Yahoo! announced their legal action at a press conference
this morning, praising the CAN-SPAM law for empowering them with
new ways to protect consumers from spam. More information about
the lawsuits can be found on the Web sites of each filing ISP.
"Today's actions prove that the days of spamming
with impunity are over, and that those who annoy Oregonians and
consumers across America with junk e-mail will face serious consequences
for their actions," said Wyden. "I believe this action
marks the dawn of a new day for spammers – one in which
they face real accountability. This is just one of the anti-spam
tools in CAN-SPAM's tool box; I'm looking forward to seeing all
of the laws provisions being used to protect consumers against
annoying, offensive and destructive unsolicited e-mail."
Wyden is also encouraging strong enforcement under other
provisions of the CAN-SPAM law, and has written Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) Chair Timothy Muris requesting that the agency
move promptly to prepare enforcement cases against high-volume "kingpin" spammers.
Worldwide, billions of spam e-mail messages are sent each day,
comprising more than half all e-mail traffic. Spam costs an estimated
$10 billion per year due to expenses for anti-spam equipment,
manpower and lost productivity. As the ISPs' lawsuits reflect,
the CAN SPAM law specifically targets deceptive messages sent
by large-volume spammers, who often hide their identities, use
misleading subject lines, and refuse to honor opt-out requests
from spam recipients.
The law prohibits false and deceptive headers and subject lines,
provides increased penalties for particularly nefarious spamming
techniques, requires senders of commercial e-mail to include
an enforceable opt-out mechanism, and includes strong, multi-pronged
enforcement by the FTC, state attorneys general, and ISPs with
the potential for multi-million dollar judgments.
###