Washington, DC
-- U.S. Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) today
joined Representative Christopher Cox (R-Calif.) to announce increasing
support for their legislation to indefinitely extend the existing
moratorium on new and discriminatory Internet taxes. The current
moratorium on unfair Internet taxes – including taxes on Internet
access, multiple-state taxation of a single item bought online,
and discriminatory taxes that treat Internet purchases differently
than other types of sales – is set to expire in November of
this year. A growing number of businesses and organizations nationwide
are backing the effort to make the ban permanent. Wyden and Burns,
along with Senators Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.),
have introduced the Internet Tax Non-Discrimination Act (S. 52)
to make the ban permanent.
“This moratorium makes sure e-tailers
have an equal shot at success in today’s economy, and I believe
they should be protected once and for all from unfair taxes that
threaten their survival,” said Wyden. “States have never
proven they’ve been injured by their inability to discriminate
against online sellers, and e-commerce has grown exponentially under
the protection of the Cox-Wyden law. It’s time to make this
ban permanent.”
“With the current state of the economy,
it's important we instate and uphold commonsense tax laws that are
fair to businesses,” said Burns. “I know how hard it
is to stay above water right now, and it's unreasonable to burden
businesses and organizations with taxes that drag them under. This
moratorium puts e-businesses on a much more level playing field,
and I believe it is time to make it permanent.”
“Electronic commerce is beginning to
blossom, but it is still in its infancy,” Leahy said. “Stability
is a key to Internet commerce reaching its full potential, and creating
new tax categories for the Internet is exactly the wrong thing to
do. Internet commerce should not be subject to discriminatory new
taxes that do not apply to other commerce. In fact, without the
current moratorium, 30,000 different jurisdictions around the country
could levy discriminatory or multiple Internet taxes on e-commerce.
We need to continue the moratorium to provide the stability necessary
for electronic commerce to flourish.”
“Since its widespread adoption less than
a decade ago, the Internet has had a profound impact on the way
America conducts business, and drove the astonishing increase in
our economy’s productivity during the 1990’s,”
Feinstein said. “This legislation will ensure that Americans
can continue to access the internet tax-free and will not have to
pay any taxes directed specifically at e-commerce. By extending
the Internet Tax Freedom Act permanently we can ensure the continued
growth of e-commerce and the spread of the internet into every American
household.”
In the House, Rep. Cox has been joined by 100
cosponsors to date. Businesses and organizations supporting the
House and Senate bills include:
• E-Bay
• The Direct Marketing Association (DMA)
• Federated Department Stores, Inc.
• Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA)
• U.S. Internet Industry Association (USIIA)
• Software Finance and Tax Executives Council (SOFTEC)
• Information Technology Association of America (ITAA)
• American Electronics Association (AeA)
In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed
a previous ruling that the nation’s 7,600 tax jurisdictions
could not impose sales tax collection burdens on out-of-state sellers
if the seller has no “nexus,” or physical presence,
in the taxing jurisdiction. Since enactment of
ITFA, which applies the Supreme Court rulings to Internet sales,
online consumers have been threatened by a growing number of tax
schemes proposed for implementation as soon as the ban expired.
Those schemes range from an arbitrary hodge-podge of state and local
sales and use taxes to the creation of a new “unified”
Federal sales tax. Extending the ITFA ban indefinitely will protect
consumers by making sure online sellers are to be treated equally
with other businesses.
S. 52 is being considered by the Senate
Commerce Committee.
###
|