WASHINGTON, DC -- Joined by the Indigo Girls, Rep.
Louise Slaughter (D-NY), and public interest advocates, Rep. Jan Schakowsky,
ranking member on the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer
Protection, today spoke at a press conference in support of maintaining local
control for low power FM radio. On May 2nd,
Rep. Schakowsky sent a letter to FCC Chairman Martin to protect low power FM
airwaves from being bought out by a few large corporations.
Rep. Schakowsky’s full statement
is below, as prepared for delivery:
“Thank you, everyone, for joining us to celebrate the astounding power of
low power FM (LPFM).
I
would like to extend a special thank you to the Indigo Girls, Amy Ray and Emily
Saliers, for being with us and for using their voices to spread the word about
LPFM. You have done a magnificent job. And, thank you, Congresswoman
Slaughter, for organizing today’s event.
Like
Congresswoman Slaughter, I believe that LPFM can help ensure that local
priorities and diverse voices get on the airwaves. Low power FM provides a
great hope to prevent further media consolidation. It’s critical that we
protect LPFM from being bought out by a few big corporations.
When
I discovered that three individuals started three “front companies” to
misappropriate and sell the public spectrum for personal profit – and
that this would mean fewer licenses for LPFM stations – I organized a letter to
the Federal Communications Commission asking for an investigation into this
scandal and to explain to Congress just how it was possible for three people to
get over 1,000 licenses.
I was
disturbed that not only did these people make $800,000 by selling the public’s
spectrum, but that they sold it to people with only one point of view.
We
may need to change the law to ensure that this does not happen again, and I look
forward to working with Congresswoman Slaughter on the issue.
Low
power FM is important because in this era of media consolidation, we are hearing
fewer and fewer voices. If we share spectrum with community groups, local
churches, and neighborhood schools through LPFM licenses, then we are taking a
big step toward restoring what we are missing today.
In
almost half of the largest markets, the three largest corporations control 80
percent of the radio audience.
This
has made it harder for diverse opinions to be heard. In March of 2003, Clear
Channel refused to air an advertisement in which Congressman Danny Davis and I
expressed our opposition to waging war in Iraq. Clear Channel refused to put
the advertisement on the air.
Part
of the problem is that many entities that own media outlets are more focused on
their bottom line rather than the public’s right to hear and express diverse
views.
I do
not dispute the right to pursue profits. However, greater media ownership
concentration will hurt our democracy.
LPFM
is one of the ways we can restore the free and open media that is central to our
democracy. LPFM can fuel civic discussion, encourage public participation in
policy debates, and ensure representation of ideological, cultural and
geographic diversity. LPFM gives us a lot to celebrate.
Additionally, LPFM – and the fight against over-concentration of media ownership
– will improve the quality of what makes it onto the airwaves.
There
has been an obsession in Congress about getting “indecency” off the airwaves. I
don’t know what it was about Janet Jackson’s nipple, but it set off a frenzy
here.
Personally, I am much more concerned about protecting my grandchildren’s First
Amendment rights than I am about them seeing Janet Jackson’s nipple.
I
believe that if we set enormous fines against artists – as has been proposed –
we will violate the Constitutional right to free speech with another form of
censorship.
Broadcast content is getting worse – in so many ways – not because fines aren’t
high enough, but because of media ownership getting further away from local
control.
Community standards and local voices are being lost because ownership of
stations has moved from the hands of the people to the hands of the
conglomerates. The concentration of media ownership into fewer and fewer hands
takes effects both infringes on the rights of local communities’ right to decide
what they want to see and hear.
Again, I believe that for those who are concerned about indecency, a much better
solution than fining artists would be promoting LPFM.
I also have another personal stake
in LPFM. Most of you probably don’t know this, but I am in a band myself with a
few other members of Congress. And, I know that the only chance that we ever
have of getting on air is if a LPFM station decided to play our music.” |