WASHINGTON, DC – Rep. Jan Schakowsky
(D-IL), the ranking member on the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and
Consumer Protection, made a statement today in a hearing of the subcommittee
questioning the administration’s failure to address trade issues with China.
Rep. Schakowsky specifically asked to know why the administration has not
addressed China’s failure to uphold its WTO obligations, its counterfeiting,
pirating, and forced labor practices, and the soaring trade deficit with China.
Rep. Schakowsky’s full remarks are below, as prepared
for delivery:
“Thank you Mr. Chairman for holding this hearing on
the Administration’s progress in addressing the serious trade issues that we
have with China. I understand that the Commerce Department was reluctant
to provide us with a witness for today’s hearing. I can certainly
understand the hesitation. I would demur as well if I had to defend the record
of this Administration.
Failure by the Administration to address such
US-China trade issues such as “forced labor” production practices, massive
counterfeiting of American products and the refusal to allow the Yuan to float
freely may be good for Walton family dividend checks from Wal-Mart but it has
been a disaster for the American economy as a whole and America’s working
families in particular.
Furthermore, this failure to achieve meaningful
resolution of the unfair trade practices employed by China is having more and
more serious consequences. As our trade deficit grows and those dollars are used
to purchase ever more of the debt instruments created by this Administration,
China becomes less and less vulnerable to retaliatory measures available to the
United States government. By the time either this administration wakes up
or is replaced by one more in tune with economic reality, we may find ourselves
with no choice but to accept the terms of trade dictated by the Chinese because
they will have the power to harm our economy with a computer stroke.
Despite promises made as a condition of US
acceptance of the admission of China to the World Trade Organization, despite
international treaties signed by the Beijing government, and in the face of
public approbation worldwide, China continues to rely upon slave-like labor
conditions for its export advantages, permits only unions whose sole function is
to “transmit” government messages to the workforce, exploits its workers with
subsistence wages, treacherous working conditions and little or no benefits.
Women in the workforce face the worst exploitation. What has the
Administration done about the import of goods made under these “competitive”
conditions?
China has become the pirate capitol of the world.
Goods that we have a notable comparative advantage in, namely movies, recorded
music, & computer software generate little income to their American owners as
pirates dominate sales in China. Current estimates are that 15-20% of China’s
manufactured goods are counterfeit encompassing 8% of its GNP. The
counterfeiting problem has recently grown even more, threatening our economic
wellbeing. Apparently designs for such large-scale items as GM cars and
Cisco operating systems are being knocked off. If all of our technology
continues to be appropriated at will by Chinese entrepreneurs then our economic
demise is a long-term certainty.
China is also playing Russian roulette with the
world economy by refusing to allow its currency to float freely. Our
record trade deficit with China ($162 billion in 2004 alone) and the related
growth in foreign currency reserves (reportedly $608 billion – more than triple
the reserves of 2000) cannot be sustained. Inflationary pressures are
bound to eventually reach the boiling point in China and another international
financial crisis will result.
Finally I acknowledge that China, as a superpower,
is a special case. It is understandable that this Administration would
treat their economic imperialism lightly if such kids- gloves treatment resulted
in political advances that made the region and the world more stable. But
what has the Administration gotten for its forbearance? The answer is
nothing. For all its kid gloves approaches to China’s economic aggression, this
Administration has not advanced the cause of peace and democracy in China and in
the region as a whole.
My question to the Administration is simple – when
do the gloves come off? When are we going to get serious about the threat
to our economy posed by China’s unfair trade practices?”