WASHINGTON,
DC
- U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky today joined Representatives Hilda
Solis, Rosa DeLauro, Carolyn Maloney, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, as well as
Marcia Greenberger, President of the National Women’s Law Center, for a press
conference to announce their opposition to the appointment of Judge Samuel Alito
to the Supreme Court.
Representative Schakowsky’s statement is below:
“For years, right-wing activists and legislators have been working to strip away
the reproductive rights of women. Their efforts have always stopped at the
doors of the Supreme Court, which has ruled by bare majorities to uphold the
protections in Roe v. Wade. The court’s swing vote is at stake today.
President Bush has nominated a judge who has acted both as an advocate and a
judge to strip away the fundamental rights protected by Roe v. Wade. While he
is trying to cloak himself as a moderate to sneak through the nomination
process, Judge Samuel Alito cannot run from his out-of-the-mainstream record on
women’s rights.”
“Judge Samuel Alito’s record and judicial philosophy make clear he is not of
Sandra Day O’Connor’s mold. His views and rulings are well to the right of most
Americans. President Bush must have had Samuel Alito in mind when he said he
would choose a justice in the mold of Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia to
appoint to the Supreme Court.”
“In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Judge Alito ruled that a married woman must
inform her husband before having an abortion. The Supreme Court at that time
overruled his extreme decision and decided instead that women should be allowed
to make their own reproductive choices.”
“In 1985, Judge Alito wrote on a job application that he was ‘particularly
proud’ of contributing to cases arguing ‘that racial and ethnic quotas should
not be allowed and that the Constitution does not protect a right to an
abortion.’ Judge Alito then said he was just applying for a job. He’s applying
for a job now, and we’ll judge him based on his record.”
“In a memo that same year, Judge Alito outlined a strategy for attacking the
1973 Roe ruling and asked ‘What can be made of this opportunity to advance the
goals of bringing about the eventual overruling of Roe v. Wade and, in the
meantime, of mitigating its effects?’”
“And finally, Judge Alito’s own mother said, ‘Of course he’s against abortion.’
We trust what our mother’s say.’”
“Members of the Senate should say no to Alito, and yes to women’s rights.”
|