FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT:
|
April 30, 2003 |
Kate Dwyer: 202-226-7326
|
House Improves IDEA, Clears Seven-Year Path to
Fulfilling Full Federal Commitment
Major Initiative
Endorsed by Key Education Groups
WASHINGTON – First District Congressman Paul Ryan voted
today in favor of legislation that reauthorizes programs under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and sets a framework to meet the full
federal commitment for special education funding of 40 percent of the average
annual per pupil expenditure in seven years.
Moreover, the legislation improves IDEA in significant ways, placing
renewed emphasis on ensuring that children are learning and shifting the focus
away from compliance with complicated rules and overwhelming paperwork.
The House of Representatives passed this measure – H.R. 1350, the
Improving Education Results for Children with Disabilities Act – by a vote of
251-171.
The following groups have expressed support for this
legislation: National School Boards Association, American Association of School
Administrators, National Association of Elementary School Principals, National
Conference on State Legislatures, The Council of Chief State School Officers,
The National Association of State Directors of Special Education, and the
National Education Association.
“All of our students deserve the chance to get a quality
education. This is why IDEA was
enacted in the first place. Sadly,
the system has often fallen short and failed to deliver on its promises to
children, parents, teachers and schools,” Ryan said. “The legislation we
passed today makes common-sense improvements that put the focus back on
education, instead of bureaucracy. IDEA
is an unfunded mandate that displaces local control in education and puts
pressure on Wisconsin property taxes.”
“This bill sets a plan and realistic timetable for the
federal government to live up to its commitment to fund special education,”
Ryan said. “For too long, our
local schools have struggled to cover more than their fair share of funds for
IDEA programs. Washington needs to
fulfill its promise on IDEA. Congress
has increased federal funding substantially in recent years, and this
legislation builds on that progress. Now,
if our state can agree on a similar plan to meet its special education funding
commitments, this will be a two-tier win for Wisconsin schools and students.”
“The bottom line is: IDEA should help, not hurt the
efforts of teachers, parents and schools to make sure all children are learning.
This legislation will help us reach that goal,” Ryan said.
“I urge the Senate to pass this important bill.”
The following provisions are included in H.R. 1350:
·
Increasing accountability and improving education results for
children with disabilities. The current IDEA system tends to place too much
emphasis on compliance with complicated rules and not enough emphasis on
academic results for children with special needs.
This legislation will ensure that states align their accountability
systems for students with disabilities to the No Child Left Behind Act
accountability system; assure that the Individualized Education Plan (IEP)
specifically addresses academic achievement of students with disabilities; and
give local school districts greater flexibility in reviewing the progress of a
child by replacing benchmarks and short-term objectives with the regular
reporting requirements of NCLB.
·
Reducing the paperwork burden.
The current system’s overwhelming and unnecessary paperwork burden
takes up teachers’ time and drives good special education teachers away from
the profession. This legislation
incorporates elements of Rep. Keller’s paperwork reduction bill, including the
3-year IEP and the use of teleconferencing.
It also authorizes a ten-state pilot program that allows states to reduce
the IEP paperwork burden on teachers.
·
Improving early intervention strategies and reducing
overidentification/ misidentification of nondisabled children.
Currently, too many children with reading problems are being identified
as disabled and placed in special education classes they do not necessarily
belong in. This legislation will
give flexibility to local school districts to use up to 15 percent of their
funds for pre-referral services for students before they are identified as
needing special education. It will require local school districts with
significant overidentification of minority students to operate pre-referral
programs that work to reduce overidentification.
·
Supporting general education and special education teachers.
The legislation will refocus State Professional Development Grants on
professional development for school personnel working with students with
disabilities; align IDEA with requirements of NCLB for “highly qualified”
teachers so that all students with disabilities are taught by a highly qualified
teacher in core content areas; and streamline Personnel Preparation programs and
encourage training of both special education teachers and regular education
teachers to work with students with disabilities.
·
Restoring trust and reducing litigation.
When it comes to IDEA, litigation has taken on more of a role of finding
and punishing school districts for technical violations, rather than being used
to protect the rights of children with disabilities.
This legislation will encourage the use of mediation as early as possible
and create opportunities for voluntary binding arbitration; require that
complaints be clear and specific when they are filed; and establish a statute of
limitations of one year from the date of the violation to file a complaint.
·
Reforming special
education finance and funding. The
current funding streams under IDEA are unnecessarily complex.
This legislation will simplify funding streams for IDEA Part B Grants to
States and establish a clear seven-year path to reach the 40 percent goal of
average per-pupil expenditure (APPE) through the discretionary appropriations
process.
A review of the U.S. Congress’ appropriations for IDEA
Part B Grants to States demonstrates accelerated progress in recent years in
funding the federal government’s commitment to special education.
Between Fiscal Years 1988 and 1995, this funding increased by 62.2%.
In contrast, between Fiscal Years 1996 and 2003, this funding increased
by 282.3%. The chart below (source:
Congressional Research Service) demonstrates this:
IDEA
Appropriations, Part B Grants to States
Fiscal Year |
Funding Level |
Yearly Change* |
% of per-pupil expenditure |
’88 |
$1.43 billion |
7.0% |
8.7% |
’89 |
$1.48 billion |
3.1% |
8.2% |
’90 |
$1.54 billion |
4.6% |
7.9% |
’91 |
$1.85 billion |
20.2% |
8.6% |
’92 |
$1.98 billion |
6.6% |
8.4% |
’93 |
$2.05 billion |
3.9% |
8.2% |
’94 |
$2.15 billion |
4.7% |
8.0% |
’95 |
$2.32 billion |
8.1% |
7.8% |
’96 |
$2.32 billion |
0.0% |
7.3% |
’97 |
$3.11 billion |
33.7% |
9.2% |
’98 |
$3.80 billion |
22.3% |
10.5% |
’99 |
$4.30 billion |
13.2% |
11.1% |
’00 |
$4.99 billion |
16.0% |
12.0% |
’01 |
$6.34 billion |
27.1% |
14.6% |
’02 |
$7.53 billion |
18.8% |
16.5% |
’03 |
$8.87 billion |
17.8% |
17.6% |
* Yearly change based on actual appropriations.