Search
Statement By U.S. Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin On Hearing On Unregistered Religious Groups In Russia
Thursday April 14, 2005Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for convening this hearing today on a subject that is essential to the OSCE process. It is vitally important to examine the situation facing religious minorities in the OSCE today because treatment of religious minorities is part of that mosaic that constitutes a country’s human rights record toward its citizens.
Human rights are not just something that the State Department talks about in its Country Reports. Human rights count. As we have seen of late, governments ignore human rights at their peril, especially when the citizenry (to use the language of the original Helsinki Accords) “know their rights and act upon them,” and rise up to evict repressive governments and governors.
With regard to religious liberty in Russia, it is truly a mixed picture. Religious freedom is generally protected at the federal level, for example, in terms of law and a reasonably benign attitude by the executive branch. But the federal level is not where religious liberty is played out on a daily basis. Many unregistered religious groups throughout the Russian Federation must regularly overcome obstacles and discrimination at the local level to practice their faith freely. These communities face difficulties ranging from acts of violence to arbitrary prohibitions on public gatherings. One issue that the Commission has followed closely is that of an unregistered Baptists congregation in a region near Moscow. For reasons that remain unclear, local officials prevented them from meeting on private property, vandals burned their house church to the ground, and authorities have threatened legal action if the facility is rebuilt. This is only of several incidents where unregistered churches have mysteriously fallen victim to fire.
In a decision that was truly chilling in terms of its logic, the Jehovah's Witnesses organization of the city of Moscow was deregistered by a city court in March 2004. Now, every time adherents of that community exercise their fundamental right to meet collectively, they place themselves in legal jeopardy. Moreover, local Russian officials appear to be using the Moscow decision to place roadblocks in the way of public convocations of Jehovah’s Witnesses in other regions of the country.
Mr. Chairman, these are two examples of repressive actions against
unregistered or "deregistered" religious groups in Russia today. From a broader
perspective, let me read one passage from the State Department 2004 country
report on Russia: “Conditions deteriorated somewhat for
minority religious faiths…Some federal agencies and many local authorities
continued to restrict the rights of various religious minorities. There were
indications that the security services increasingly treated the leadership of
some minority religious groups as security threats.” In
the 108th Congress I introduced legislation, HR 1224, co-sponsored by
Commissioner Pitts and others, which would graduate Russia from our
Jackson-Vanik requirements and extend normal trade relations. In our legislation we noted that the Russian
Federation had: committed itself to ensuring the freedom of religion; engaged in
efforts to combat ethic and religious intolerance; and continued to restitute
religious property. The legislation also
urged the Russian Federation to ensure that “its national, regional, and local
laws, regulations, practices, and policies fully, and in conformity with the
standards of the OSCE…safeguard religious liberty throughout the Russian
Federation, including by ensuring that the registration of religious groups,
visa and immigration requirements, and other laws, regulations, and practices
are not used to interfere with the activities or internal affairs of minority
religious communities.” Today, Mr.
Chairman, I have serious reservations about whether the Russian Federation is
meeting the standards we have set out in our legislation to graduate them from
Jackson Vanik and extend normal trade relations. I look forward to
an update on these issues from Ambassador Hanford, and an informative discussion
by all of our witnesses today.