Wyden
Introduces Bipartisian Health Care Legislation that Works For All
Americans
October
7, 2002
M. President, today I join with Senator Orrin Hatch, one of the most
caring and thoughtful public officials I've ever known, in offering
a bipartisan roadmap to health care that works for all Americans.
Our country has been trying to find
such a path since President Harry Truman's proposal to cover all
Americans was voted down in 1945. I believe our proposal can succeed
after 57 years of failure because we begin with the public discussing
and deciding their health care priorities, followed by a guarantee
that Congress will vote on the recommendations that result from
these discussions.
This approach has never been tried before.
Now when major health laws are written, politicians sit down and
prescribe what benefits will be offered and then try to come up
with the money to pay for them. After the politicians write their
plans, various special interest lobbies start attacking one feature
or another through shrill television commercials. Pretty soon the
public gets understandably confused, the chance for building consensus
is lost, and important health care needs go unmet.
The 280 million Americans whose survival
depends on quality, affordable health care have never been given
the chance to shape their health care future before the special
interest lobbyists weighed in. The Wyden-Hatch bill changes that.
Under our proposal, the public gets to jump start health reform
by stating their priorities at the outset rather than being treated
as an afterthought.
We believe our legislation can serve
as an illuminated route to a health care system where each American
has the ability to obtain quality, affordable health care coverage.
We place three signposts on our roadmap to provide guidance to the
American people and their elected officials as they make the tough
choices inherent in tackling health care reform.
At the first signpost, the public is
given an extensive opportunity, in their home communities and online,
to state their personal health care priorities and how they should
be paid for. In addition, the public will be asked to look beyond
their personal needs to those of the commuity at large, and how
those needs should be paid for.
Our legislation forthrightly asks the
public those questions that must be answered to have meaningful
health reform, questions such as:
"What kind of health care do you want
most? How much are you willing to pay? How should costs be contained
without sacrificing quality of care? Should the government or private
businesses be required to pay part of your costs? How about your
neighbors?"
Our national government has never directly
asked the public these questions before. After asking these questions,
the government should keep quite for a while and listen to the people.
Because without some sense of the public's views, it will always
be virtually impossible to build the nationwide consensus needed
to create a health care system that works for everyone.
To ask the key questions and follow
up on the suggestions given by the American people, the Wyden-Hatch
legislation creates a Citizens' Health Care Working Group. The Working
Group is made up of a representative cross-section of our people.
It is not just another Washington, DC commission of so-called policy
experts.
The Working Group directs the public
participation portion of this proposal. For example, as a guide
to help the public in formulating their views on the tough choices
that lie ahead, the Wyden-Hatch legislation directs the Working
Group to prepare and make widely available a "Health Report to the
American People."
The legislation we have authored requires
that this report be written in understandable language and describe
the cost and availability of the major public and private health
choices now available – and also contain enough information so the
public can create alternatives. Here are the kinds of issues we
want to address: "If covering liver transplants under government
health programs requires cutting other services, what services are
you willing to cut, or would you rather not have liver transplants
covered? If government coverage of long-term care for the elderly
would require workers to begin contributing to the program at age
40, is it still worth it to you?"
These are moral choices about what health
care the public has a right to expect. These are economic choices
that affect the finances of our families. These are legal and social
choices that will be difficult for our people to make. The Wyden-Hatch
proposal is built around the proposition that these choices are
too important to duck any longer.
After establishing a sense of how the
public feels about these hard choices, the legislation directs that
the Working Group move to the second signpost on our roadmap. There
the Working Group is to take the ideas offered by the American people,
and translate these views into recommendations for our elected officials
to create a health care system that works for all. With the Working
Group's involvement in the public participation requirement of this
legislation, we believe they are the right people to take this historic
step: to synthesize the opinions and information provided by the
public and then present a faithful picture to Congress.
At the third signpost, the Congress
takes the recommendations from the Working Group and utilizes the
legislative process to develop one or more plans from the recommendations,
with a guarantee to the public that the plans will be voted on in
both Houses of Congress. We believe that the assurance that Congress
will vote after the public's will is expressed provides an added
measure of credibility for this legislation. Simply put, people
will be able to see their voices, their participation, lead to actual
votes on the floors of both Houses of Congress.
With these steps I have described, our
country can as never before discuss, decide and deliver on health
care that works for all.
I know there will be many questions
about this proposal, and I'll try to answer them in the coming days.
I'd like to briefly answer just one question I've already been asked:
"Why now? This is the end of the Congressional session; we are all
concerned about the possibility of war with Iraq. Why are you putting
this before Congress today?"
My answer is that the lack of decent
health care for so many Americans, and the skyrocketing costs of
coverage for insured Americans, threaten countless lives and our
economic security just as tenaciously as any foreign enemy our nation
has ever faced. Just as we are beginning a debate about how best
to address the nation's security interests, it is high time we resumed
the debate about how to address the inequities and failures of the
American health care system.
On health care, our families can't afford
to wait any longer. Congress is completing another session without
significant progress on major health care issues. A demographic
tsunami of baby boomer retirees is coming soon. It is increasingly
evident that piecemeal health reform – considering prescription
drugs one day, patients' rights legislation the next, something
else after that – isn't working.
I have no intention on giving up on
any one of those important issues when it's possible to get Congress
to consider them separately. I still believe the bipartisan prescription
drug bill I authored with Olympia Snowe could bring the Senate together
and help seniors get and afford prescription medicine now.
Yet it is clear that because health
care is like an ecosystem, with one part affecting all others, it
is extremely difficult to make real progress on a single important
issue without factoring in the way it will ripple through our entire
health care system.
So as the Congress pushes ahead on prescriptions
and other urgent needs, let us simultaneously reopen the debate
about creating a health care system that works for all. That debate
stopped in 1994, and needs to begin again. The Wyden-Hatch bill
provides an opportunity to reopen this debate, and by introducing
our bill now we believe it will be ready for full Congressional
deliberation when the next Congress begins in January.
One way or another, it is urgent that
Congress find a way to do better by the people's health care needs.
My constituents at home in Oregon make
this case constantly. At town meetings, Chamber of Commerce lunches,
labor halls, non-profit board meetings, after church coffee hours,
and especially at my "sidewalk office hours" where I just set up
a card table to listen, they ask, "Ron, when's Congress going to
get going on health care and help us out?"
One Oregon business after another has
been telling me their health premiums are going up by as much as
20 percent a year. The number of uninsured is going up, with many
of these individuals working at small businesses whose owners desperately
want to offer health coverage and can't figure out how to do it
and keep their doors open. Many physicians have been leaving government
health programs because of inadequate reimbursements. Thousands
and thousands of pages of health care regulations now exist and
the system is almost choking on all the bureaucracy.
We know that America's health care system
is scientifically prodigious. Every day our dedicated and caring
health care providers are performing miracles. Last year more than
$1.4 trillion was spent on health care in America. Divide that sum
by the number of Americans, and there would be enough for every
family of four to receive more than $18,000 for health care. With
all this money, and so much talent and creativity in America, shouldn't
it be possible to create a health system that works for everyone?
Senator Hatch and I believe it is. We
know it will be hard, but we believe it can be done if our roadmap
is used.
For example, to achieve real reform
our elected officials are going to have to reject the blame game.
Republicans can no longer say the problem in health care is primarily
the trial lawyers. Democrats can no longer say the problem in health
care is primarily the insurance companies. All – let me repeat,
all – of the powerful lobbies are going to have to accept some changes
they have rejected in the past if America is to have a health care
system that works for everyone. I believe that's what we'll hear
from the public if they're given the chance to discuss and decide
their health care priorities as the Wyden-Hatch legislation envisions.
Before I wrap up, I'd like to offer
a few thank-yous.
First, to the people of Oregon. You've
honored me with the chance to serve you and I get up every morning
feeling like the luckiest guy around. It wasn't that long ago, as
co-director of the Gray Panthers, I was driving seniors to meetings
in a beat-up station wagon and I never thought I would have the
privilege of serving this way. You can see I've modeled much of
this legislation after the way Oregon debated health care, which
still stands as the first locally driven initiative to ask the tough
questions.
Oregonians began asking those difficult
questions in community meetings more than a decade ago for one reason:
Governor John Kitzhaber, an emergency room doctor, insisted that
we do so. He deserves great credit for his efforts, his courage
and his tenacity. When I told him I was going to push Congress to
build on Oregon's public process, he said, "Go for it."
Senator Hatch could have easily said
he wanted no part of this. He's already written important health
legislation from S-CHIP to community health centers to Hatch-Waxman,
and he's got about the fullest plate in the Senate with his Judiciary
and Intelligence responsibilities. But he, Patricia Knight and Patricia
DeLoatche have been thoughtful and patient as we went through draft
after draft of this proposal in an effort to start the discussion
now.
Dr. Paul Ellwood, the founder of the
Jackson Hole Group, has been working for more than three decades
to create a health care system that works for everyone. Now, when
he could be enjoying retirement riding horses in beautiful Jackson
Hole, he's still bringing together health policy makers at 7:00
a.m. on a Sunday morning in an effort to find consensus. He has
been so helpful in the development of this proposal, and his own
new plan called Heroic Pathways, by encouraging the use of information
technologies and evidence-based medicine – a fancy way of saying
medicine that actually works – has great potential. To Paul and
Barbara I say, we wouldn't be here today without you two.
In my office, Stephanie Kennan and Carole
Grunberg kept us tethered to reality, and Ms. Daphne Edwards, a
young lawyer in the legislative counsel's office, produced eight
separate drafts of this legislation alone.
I went into public life because I've
always felt that if the public couldn't get quality, affordable
health care they wouldn't be able to do much else. Since those Gray
Panthers days, I've felt that it's wrong for people in this country
to die because they can't get health care, or because it comes too
late.
America is now hemorrhaging dollars
into a health care system that doesn't work at all for far too many
of our people. The longer people go on dying needlessly, and the
longer prosperity and security elude our families, the less America
looks like the America of our dreams. No one I know thinks it should
be so easy to slip through the cracks in our health care system.
No one I know believes America is supposed to be a place where people
forfeit their well-being for doing honest work that just doesn't
pay enough for good medical care.
The Wyden-Hatch legislation is a chance
to move toward America as it is meant to be. People can voice their
vision for health care in America. Their voices can count. Their
vision can come to pass. So today I ask the Senate to give our people
this opportunity. The Wyden-Hatch bill provides a roadmap. The great
people of this country, working with their public servants, can
use it as a guide to a health care system that works for everyone.
M. President, I yield the floor.
### |