Link
to More Information About the Oregon Economic Summit on Monday,
December 9
Wyden Plans Bipartisan Oregon Economic Summit
for December
May
31, 2002
It's great to see so many of my friends here today. You know, I've
been hosting these business breakfasts for a lot of years, but today's
is a little different.
My usual format at these events is that
I talk for awhile about business issues in the spotlight back in
Washington, D.C., and then I answer some of your questions.
Today, however, I want to turn most
of the focus on Oregon and Oregon's business climate.
As you may know, I pride myself on being
a free trade, "grow-the-economy" Democrat.
Those aren't the issues that drove my
initial interest in political office, however. What came first was
my work with Oregon's senior population.
I saw first-hand how better nutrition,
access to affordable health care, and responsive law enforcement
could make all the difference in the world in the quality of life
of these Oregonians.
I saw many of the same issues with regard
to Oregon's kids, many of whom were under-nourished, under-educated,
and lacking fundamental health care services that would give them
a fighting chance in this life.
And so I immersed myself in the world
of government programs that provided decent health care, a daily
square meal through Meals on Wheels or the school lunch program,
and educational opportunity through Head Start.
I entered politics because of my passion
for these issues. But what made me a "grow-the-economy" Democrat
was my epiphany as a young man – and as a young Democrat -- that
unless we continued to grow our economy and our prosperity, the
public support for these costly programs simply wouldn't be there
forever.
And so for over 20 years I've tried
to be an independent voice for Oregon in the Congress, and I continue
to look for opportunities to grow Oregon's economy in the U.S. Senate.
Last week, I cast my vote in favor of
giving our President a fast track for consideration of trade agreements.
You've probably heard it from me before,
but it bears repeating every time I get a chance to talk about economic
issues of importance to the state: one in six jobs in Oregon is
directly linked to trade, and this is one Democrat who will never
turn his back on those working men and women.
Some of those same trade-dependent men
and women are also employed by family-owned businesses in our state.
As you know, Oregon has an extraordinary concentration of family-owned
businesses, businesses which live under the constant threat of crippling
estate taxes.
I crossed party lines last year and
voted to bring an end to the estate tax. But because Congress couldn't
reach agreement on how to pay for it – and all of the many other
priorities the White House and Congress want to fund -- the estate
tax is scheduled to re-emerge in 9 years.
Now, to remedy this absurdity, the U.S.
Senate is scheduled to take up estate tax repeal when Congress returns
this summer.
My vote this time has been made all
the more difficult by the proximity of the November elections, and
by the decision of some in my Party to make this vote a litmus test
issue for congressional Democrats.
I am announcing to you today that I
have made my decision on the upcoming estate tax repeal vote. I
will cast my vote to end this tax, and I will do it the name of
issues that Democrats hold dear.
Democrats believe in standing up for
working families.
No one will suffer more than the employees
of family-owned companies in this state that will break up, or sell
out to larger corporations, in order to satisfy their estate tax
obligations.
Democrats believe in standing up for
the environment.
Yet most environmentalists have never
thought about what happens to farmland and timberland when heirs
are forced to quickly pay their estate tax bills.
If you oppose losing farmland to strip
malls, or if you worry about unwise forestry practices on private
lands, you should stand with me and work to repeal the estate tax.
The estate tax is anti-worker, anti-environment,
and anti-Oregon, and it is time for it to go.
The same issues I confronted many years
ago as a young man in Oregon politics are still very relevant today
in state politics.
Our state was arguably the hardest hit
by the current recession of all the states. We were among the first
to feel its affects and may be among the last to pull out.
Salem is experiencing a budget crisis
the likes of which we have never seen. Yet when the legislature
looked into the abyss a short while ago, they just couldn't find
it in their hearts to make the budget cuts that would have sent
our state backward on a whole host of programs that are critical
to Oregon's kids and the elderly.
In my opinion, this generation of leaders
in Salem is getting a very painful, but potentially useful reminder
about the suffering that will occur if we fail to meet our obligation
to grow-the-economy and prepare for Oregon's future.
It's obviously too late for this recession
and this budget mess to do anything forward-looking that will pull
us out of the current difficulties.
The good news is that Oregon will eventually
pull out of this recession.
The bad news, and the challenge ahead,
is that the nation and the state will face future recessions.
Further, I am not confident that Oregon
is well-positioned to take advantage of future economic prosperity.
Our loss of major, Oregon-based employers,
our budget and educational challenges, and the lack of a well-accepted
statewide economic development strategy cry out for leadership,
and cry out for a coming together as Oregonians.
There have been a number of worthy attempts
to guide Oregon's economic development, and my speech today is not
meant in any way to be an indictment of those efforts.
The "Regional Strategies Program," "Oregon
Shines," "Oregon Shines II," and other plans have all contained
useful ideas for moving forward, and some have spun off initiatives
that have produced results.
It isn't that we are lacking ideas for
comprehensive state economic development, but that we are lacking
the necessary political commitment -- or "buy-in," if you will --
across city, county, and partisan lines to laying and maintaining
the groundwork for Oregon's economic future.
Until you get us all on the same page,
across party lines, and keep us there, the state's economic development
efforts will always fall more than a few years, and a few dollars,
short.
What I am proposing today is a blueprint
for a public-private endowment of our state's economic development
strategy . . . investing Oregon's political leaders in the plan,
committing us to the plan, and holding us accountable for our follow-through.
While our next Governor must take a
leadership role in economic development, we cannot fully endow this
plan unless there is a commitment from your state, Federal, and
local officeholders.
For instance, next year Congress will
begin working on the reauthorization of the transportation bill.
I'm on the committee that will write that bill, as is Congressman
DeFazio. Your congressional delegation will direct many millions
of dollars to transportation needs in the state.
While ODOT and others have always weighed
in on such matters, these bills have always been, in large part,
a political exercise. Instead of having seven "free agents," wouldn't
it better serve the state if these decisions were substantially
guided by a public-private economic development plan for the state?
In order to achieve this, we need to
come together and devise a process that will unite state, local,
federal, urban, rural, and business voices as allies in Oregon's
future.
Today I am announcing that I have asked
Jonathan Ortmanns of the Public Forum Institute to come to Oregon
shortly after the election in November to help convene a summit
to help coalesce the political and business communities around a
single vision for Oregon's economic development. The Public Forum
Institute is a non-partisan, non-profit organization that has convened
hundreds of conferences across the country designed to elicit ideas
and get diverse groups working together to tackle difficult issues.
I want to make clear that this will
not be a Ron Wyden event. This will be a non-partisan gathering
of business and political leaders from across the state, and held
in conjunction with the efforts of the Oregon Business Council.
For those of you who don't know, the
Oregon Business Council has been working to develop an economic
development agenda for Oregon's business community, and has enjoyed
great cooperation from state and local economic development agencies
and a variety of business leaders throughout Oregon.
Their efforts – involving Dick Reiten,
Duncan Wyse, and many others – have the potential to unify the state
in a fashion that hasn't occurred before. I strongly support their
efforts, and want to help make certain that we don't blow the opportunity
to get the job done right this time.
I have already asked some of Oregon's
top political leaders from both parties to join with me as hosts
of this event. I am pleased to report that both Senator Smith and
Ted Kulongoski have agreed to co-host the summit with me, and that
I am extending the same invitation to Kevin Mannix, Bill Bradbury,
Peter DeFazio, who is the Dean of the House delegation, and key
Republican and Democratic leaders from the legislature.
I will also be asking Oregon's congressional
delegation, the newly constituted legislature, and urban and rural
leaders from across the state to participate as co-hosts of this
effort.
As Senator Smith and I have done in
the U.S. Senate, we will be asking politicians to leave their politics
at the threshold when it comes to working toward a brighter future
for Oregon's economy.
Along the way there will be many challenges.
For instance, whatever we do, we must make certain that the economic
progress we make comes, in significant part, as a result of the
advancement of our rural areas, and not at the expense of those
communities.
We must get communities and businesses
to stop thinking of each other as adversaries, and to start working
together as allies. For example, while I understand the frustration
with regard to Columbia Sportswear's move to Washington County,
the last time I checked, Washington County and Portland were rather
dependent on one another for each other's future.
Where would Portland be today if not
for Intel, of Washington County?
Cities and counties, rural and urban
areas, institutions of higher learning, and others, are going to
have to learn to come together in order for Oregon to reach its
highest potential.
What we have learned from previous economic
development efforts in this state is that when economic planning
is driven primarily by government, the business community is unlikely
to come together and work for its implementation.
Likewise, if the business community
comes forward with its own plan without investing elected officials
in its outcome, the success of the effort will again be limited.
We must learn to work together and trust
one another, and we need a little help to get there.
Our goal must be to invest the business
community and elected officials in a wise course for Oregon's economic
future, get both sides committed to that plan, and then hold us
accountable for whether we have used our resources and clout to
get the job done.
The one proposal I know I will bring
to this conference later this year is that the business community
should devise a non-partisan way to grade Oregon elected officials
on whether we are meeting our end of the bargain. Specifically,
we need an objective report card for whether we have devoted our
time, energy, and command over public resources toward the long-term
economic goals of the state.
Invest us, commit us, hold us accountable.
And let the voters know how we're doing.
Now I would like to hear your thoughts
and questions, not only on what's going on in Washington, but also
on what I can do as your Senator to help prepare the State for a
better economic future.
### |