This web site was copied prior to December 11, 2006. It is now a Federal record managed by the National Archives and Records Administration. External links, forms, and search boxes may not function within this collection. Learn more.   [hide]

Get email updates on the latest news and information from Charles on the issues that matter.


Home   /   Capitol Connection   /   Capitol Connection 03/10/2006

UAE Port Agreement Blocked by the Appropriations Committee

I am pleased to inform you that the proposed port security deal with the United Arab Emirates has been stopped in its tracks. On Wednesday night, the House Appropriations Committee – on which I have the privilege to serve – voted to deny all funding for the implementation of this unacceptable deal. The Committee voted 62 to 2 in support of an amendment to prohibit any federal funds from being used to carry out the terms of the agreement with Dubai Ports World, and to prohibit the agreement itself under federal law. I voted in strong support of this amendment. Yesterday, in response to this committee action, Dubai Ports World announced that it would abandon it plans to assume operations at six ports on the East Coast.

This vote sent a strong signal to the Administration that we in Congress do not answer to any President. We answer to the American people, and on this issue they spoke out with a single voice: this deal must not happen.

Forest Land Sale Proposal Opposed

Yesterday, U.S. Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth testified on his agency’s Fiscal Year 2007 budget request before the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, which I chair. During this hearing, I told Chief Bosworth directly and plainly that the Administration’s proposal to dispose of 300,000 acres of national forest lands was not going to happen. Any sale of forest land affects the communities and counties in which those forests are located. It is unthinkable to put out a plan to sell off this much land, all across the nation, without first sitting down with each of those local communities and talking about their priorities and their goals. Decisions about land use should be set by stakeholders at the local level, not nameless, faceless bureaucrats in Washington who can’t tell Franklin from Fargo. If there’s one thing we don’t need in WNC, it’s more outsiders telling us what’s best for us, our families, and our community.

I further objected to the Administration’s proposal because it would send a disproportionate amount of land sale revenues to school districts in the Pacific Northwest. While more than a third of all the acreage proposed for sale lies in the South and Midwest regions, our school districts would receive only 10 percent of the revenues.

The Administration’s proposal was intended to generate revenues to pay for reauthorization of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000. Under this program, counties which had historically received 25% of the Forest Service’s timber harvest revenues are compensated for the enormous declines in harvests that occurred under the Clinton Administration. The program is set to expire at the end of September of 2006.

I cosponsored the original Secure Rural Schools bill because so many of the counties in Western North Carolina depend on those revenues. We can – and we will – reauthorize the program this year, but we will not sell off national forest lands to pay for it. I am proud to be a cosponsor of HR 517, legislation to reauthorize the Secure Rural Schools program that is currently pending in the House.