Fundamental
Fairness in the AD/CVD Sunset Review Process
The
Department of Commerce (DoC) and International Trade
Commission (ITC) are required by law to conduct five-year
“sunset reviews” of anti-dumping and countervailing duty
(AD/CVD) orders to determine whether to terminate, suspend, or
continue the duties beyond the five years they have already
been in place. I
have introduced a resolution that urges the DoC and ITC to
consider, and report on, the impact of the AD/CVD orders on
domestic steel-consuming companies and the overall economy
when conducting sunset reviews of duties on steel products.
The DoC and ITC have the discretion to take into account the
impact of these duties on steel consumers, and they should.
But traditionally they have not.
If this continues, economic decisions will be made
without seeing the full effects of those decisions.
This is not wise, and it’s not fair.
Furthermore, the damage unnecessary duties do to steel
consumers causes the customer base for domestic steel
producers to shrink, ultimately harming the steel industry.
Sound economic policy cannot be made in a vacuum.
When economic policy decisions are made, the full
effects of those decisions should be taken into consideration.
This
resolution does nothing to change trade law. It
simply calls for sound policy and fundamental fairness.
The
Resolution (adobe acrobat required) Introductory
Statement on the Resolution Testimony
Before the International Trade Commission |