|
||
Rep. Davis
Speaks Up for Seniors Davis
highlighted continued enrollment difficulties for low income Medicare
beneficiaries, problems with pharmacy reimbursements and low enrollment
numbers. Davis
asked Dr. McClellan to respond to questions about the impact of these
problems on “The Medicare prescription
drug program was supposed to help Rep. Davis opposed the
Medicare Modernization Act, which created Medicare Part D. However,
since the law’s enactment, Davis has worked to fix the program,
endorsing a bill to delay the deadline for enrollment so seniors have
more time to make sense of the confusing drug plans, legislation to
allow the Administration to negotiate with drug companies for lower
prices on the medications used by Medicare beneficiaries, as well as a
bill to ensure states are fully reimbursed for covering the cost of
prescriptions for low-income seniors who have been turned away from the
Medicare drug plan. Below is Rep. Davis’ statement. Thank you Chairman Deal and
Ranking Member Brown for holding such an important hearing that affects
so many of our seniors and disabled. As we all know, the implementation
of the new Medicare Part D drug benefit has gotten off to an extremely
rocky start. Numerous problems have kept low-income seniors and
individuals with disabilities from receiving their life-saving
medications, leaving them to depend on a family member for coverage, pay
more for their medications or completely forgo the medications they
need. These problems have lead 27 states, including my home state of As it should, the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has stepped up to reimburse states
until Although CMS is working on
enrollment eligibility problems, I am concerned that there continues to
be reimbursement problems for pharmacists, particularly independent
community pharmacists. I have learned that many are simply not getting
reimbursed by Part D drug plans. In some cases, this problem is
forcing pharmacists to take such drastic measures as closing their doors
to all Medicare beneficiaries. For example, in my home state of Florida,
Carrabelle Medical Pharmacy, a community pharmacy in the Panhandle and
the only one in town, will begin turning away Medicare patients next
month because HMO plans are not paying promptly and in some cases not
paying at all. Carrabelle Medical Pharmacy also services the Assisted
Living Facility, which will now, unfortunately, have to go to the next
town, 45 minutes away, in order to get their Medicare beneficiary’s
medications. If pharmacies are not
reimbursed promptly, we will see more and more deny service to Medicare
patients or, worse yet, close down all together, leaving
CMS has the authority to
sanction any Part D plan for failure to comply with contract
requirements. Sanctions can include a written notice of warning,
suspension of enrollment of Medicare beneficiaries, suspension of
Medicare payments and suspension of plan marketing activities. Has CMS
taken any of these steps as to HMO companies that have not reimbursed
pharmacies? If not, why not? Dr. McClellan, I am further
concerned about the enrollment numbers of the new drug benefit. The US
Department of Health and Human Services recently announced that, as of While the implementation of the new Medicare Part D drug benefit got off to a shaky start, CMS may, if they choose, be able to solve some of these problems administratively. In the meantime, I hope that Dr. McClellan will voice his support for legislation I have cosponsored to extend the deadline for enrollment so seniors have more time to make sense of the confusing drug plans. That said, the problems we are facing today are only a glimpse of what we may face when the major Medicare changes in 2010 take place. Congress and this committee must begin addressing the long term problems with this program. One important step we should take is to allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate with drug companies for lower prices on the medications used by Medicare beneficiaries. This is a very important issue to Florida’s seniors and disabled individuals. Due to the time constraints in the Health Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce, today I will be submitting questions to Administrator McClellan and asking for a written response. I look forward to working with CMS and my colleagues on ways to make sure that Medicare Part D provides a meaningful drug benefit.
|
||