Good afternoon. I am Bradley Gordon, Director for Policy and
Governmental Affairs of the American
We strongly believe in pre-approval of privately-financed congressional trips by the Committee, along with rules requiring greater transparency, accountability, and disclosure. We commend the Committee for fulfilling these requirements in its most recent advisory. We believe the model outlined in that advisory upholds the key principles I just mentioned, so that the Committee may in fact successfully exercise its vital oversight role.
The Middle East is an area where
the vital interests of the
A typical AIEF trip will include
meetings with the top political leadership of Israel, with opposition political
leaders across the political spectrum, senior military officials, academics, senior
Palestinian officials, and journalists – both Arab and Israeli,The trips also include visits to important historic,
cultural, and religious sites that help explain
Current Rules
Since the House and Senate rewrote the rules concerning privately-funded travel some ten years ago, AIEF has been scrupulous about following all the rules. First, we create a very rigorous educational program on the ground that meets if not surpasses Congressional requirements. Second, we work closely with Members of Congress and their staffs to provide them in advance and after the trip all the information they need for approval and disclosure requirements. Within weeks of each trip, we provide the Members’ offices with all the cost information they need for filing official disclosures.
Considerations for New Rules
Here are some basic principles to consider as you undertake to write new rules:
1. Increase disclosure, transparency and accountability. There should be more disclosure to the Ethics Committee both in advance and after the trip. A well-defined preapproval process is essential. AIEF also thinks it is important to publicly disclose information about the trip after the trip is complete. We believe Members of Congress and their staffs participating in educational trips are helping to fulfill their mandate as responsible legislators exploring some of the most complex issues of the day.
2.
Insist on
disclosure, but not micromanagement. Absolutely
disclose the program, all its participants, the funding sources—as you now
require under the current Committee advisory, rather than devising overly
formulaic rules and putting the onus on the organizations undertaking these
trips. We also believe that trip programs need to be judged in their
totality. The Committee should be understanding that itineraries are dynamic. Many changes take place even during the
trip—meeting times get changed, some meetings inevitably get cancelled as
others are scheduled. Over all, such
changes should not affect the purpose of the trip.
3.
Ensure
security and privacy before the trip. Just
as AIEF believes that no one undertaking legitimate educational trips should
have any problems publicly disclosing information about the trips once they are
concluded, we believe that such information should be held in confidence by the
Committee until then. We recognize the
tension between public disclosure and security when traveling to troubled
regions.
We believe that full advance disclosure to the Committee is in
order, but that such detailed disclosure to the public should be made after the
fact, given the potential impact on the security of Members of Congress
traveling abroad. Certainly when going
to a region of conflict—but not limited to such circumstances—it is very
important not to reveal the proposed itinerary of the trip in advance. .
4.
Keep the
rules clear and simple. The rules
should be simple and easy to follow. It
benefits no one if the rules are so complicated that outside organizations have
a difficult time understanding or following them.
Again, we believe that the Committee has fulfilled these requirements in its most recent advisory and has devised a model that assures more disclosure, transparency, and accountability, and has done so with relative simplicity.
Thank you.