Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives on

Gifts and Travel

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

GIFTS HIGHLIGHTS

GIFTS

BACKGROUND ON GIFT REGULATION

BASIC GIFT PROHIBITIONS

GIFT RULE HISTORY

OVERVIEW OF THE GIFT RULE

WHAT IS A GIFT?

WHO IS SUBJECT TO THE GIFT RULE?

ACCEPTABLE GIFTS, IN GENERAL

Application of the Rule in Specific Circumstances

Relationship of the General Provision on Acceptable Gifts to the Specific Provisions

OTHER ACCEPTABLE GIFTS

Gifts Given on the Basis of Personal Friendship

Attendance at Events (including meals)

Food or Refreshments of Nominal Value (Attendance at Receptions)

Meal or Local Transportation Incident to a Visit to a Business Site

An Item of Nominal Value

Commemorative Items

Books, Periodicals and Other Informational Materials

Things Paid for by the Federal Government, or by a State or Local Government

Gifts from Foreign Governments and International Organizations

Benefits Resulting from Outside Business and Other Activities

Personal Hospitality of an Individual

Contributions to a Legal Expense Fund, and Pro Bono Legal Services

"Home State" Products

Honorary Degrees and Nonmonetary Public Service Awards

Training in the Interest of the House

Widely Available Opportunities and Benefits

Loans

Awards and Prizes

Gifts from Relatives

Gifts from Other Members, Officers or Employees

Things for which a Gift Rule Waiver Is Granted

Other Acceptable Gifts

EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED GIFTS

Certain Gifts from Lobbyists

Definition of Registered Lobbyist

HANDLING UNACCEPTABLE GIFTS

Pay Market Value for the Gift

Prompt Return to the Donor

Artwork and Other Gifts of an Unusual Nature

EVENTS IN HONOR OF A MEMBER, OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE

BRIBERY AND ILLEGAL GRATUITIES

FUNDRAISERS AND TESTIMONIALS

GIFT DISCLOSURE

TRAVEL HIGHLIGHTS

TRAVEL

OFFICIALLY CONNECTED TRAVEL PAID FOR BY A PRIVATE SOURCE

Summary of the Rule

Requirement that the Travel Be in Connection with Official Duties

Requirements for Advance Authorization of Staff Travel, and for Post-Trip Disclosure of Member and Staff Travel

Proper Sources of Expenses for Officially Connected Travel

Proper Destinations for Officially Connected Travel Paid by a Private Source

Time Limits

Acceptable Travel Expenses

Accompanying Spouse or Child

Travel of Members and Staff Leaving Office

TRAVEL UNRELATED TO OFFICIAL DUTIES PAID FOR BY A PRIVATE SOURCE

Travel Resulting from Outside Business, Employment or Other Activities.

Gift of Travel Given on the Basis of Personal Friendship

Other Gift Rule Provisions

TRAVEL PAID FOR BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, OR BY STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT

TRAVEL PAID FOR BY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT

TRAVEL PAID FOR BY A POLITICAL ORGANIZATION

OFFICIAL TRAVEL

Applicability of the Prohibition Against Private Subsidy of Official Activity.

Use of the Government Rate

Use of Frequent Flier Miles Earned Through Official Travel

MIXED PURPOSE TRIPS

TRAVEL TO A CHARITY EVENT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED

USE OF A PRIVATE AIRCRAFT FOR TRAVEL

APPENDICES

House Gift Rule, House Rule 26, clause 5 (106th Congress)

CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

Legal Expense Fund Regulations

Gift Rule Provisions Applicable to Loans to Members, Officers and Employees

Advance Authorization of Employee Travel

EMPLOYEE TRAVEL DISCLOSURE FORM

MEMBER/OFFICER TRAVEL DISCLOSURE FORM

FOREIGN GIFTS AND DECORATIONS ACT, 5 U.S.C. §7342

REGULATIONS FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF DECORATIONS AND GIFTS FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS

Form For Disclosing Gifts From Foreign Governments Pursuant To 5 U.S.C. § 7342

TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE

5 U.S.C. § 7351

5 U.S.C. § 7353

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE

18 U.S.C. § 201

TITLE 22, UNITED STATES CODE

22 U.S.C. § 2458a

 


GIFTS HIGHLIGHTS

A Member, officer or employee of the House must never

Under the House gift rule, a Member, officer or employee may accept a gift (other than cash or cash equivalent) that has a value of less than $50, and gifts having a cumulative value of less than $100 from a single source in a calendar year. Gifts having a value of less than $10 do not count toward the annual limit of less than $100.

The gift rule also allows the acceptance of the following specific kinds of gifts and other things of value:

[Note: The matter of acceptance of travel and travel expenses is covered in the next chapter of this booklet.]

As a general rule, when a Member, officer or employee receives a gift that cannot be accepted under the gift rule, he or she must either pay the donor the market value for the gift, or return the gift to the donor promptly. However, a perishable item may be donated to charity or destroyed.

In addition, the Code of Ethics for Government Service admonishes all Federal officials never to accept favors or benefits in circumstances that might create the appearance of influencing the performance of official duties.

Members of the House may not treat receipts from fundraisers or testimonials as unrestricted personal gifts, but rather must treat such receipts as campaign contributions, which may not be used for either personal or official congressional purposes.

A gift to a spouse, dependent or other individual will be deemed a gift to the Member, officer or employee if the gift was given with the knowledge and acquiescence of the official, and the official has reason to believe the gift was given because of his or her official position.

Members, officers and certain House employees must file annual financial disclosure reports, and among the items that must be disclosed in those reports are the source and value of certain gifts received.

 

GIFTS

BACKGROUND ON GIFT REGULATION

Congress has recognized that "public office is a public trust.1 " Members of Congress hold office to represent the interests of their constituents and the public at large. Members are assisted in these efforts by officers and employees who are paid from United States Treasury funds. The public has a right to expect Members, officers and employees to exercise impartial judgment in performing their duties.2  Quite clearly, the receipt of gifts or favors from certain persons or special interests may interfere with this impartial judgment. The recipient of a gift will naturally feel grateful, and the giver may expect favorable treatment or consideration in return.3 

A 1951 report entitled Ethical Standards in Government, issued by a Senate subcommittee headed by Senator Paul H. Douglas, articulated some of the basic concerns that arise regarding acceptance of gifts by public officials:

What is it proper to offer to public officials, and what is it proper for them to receive? A cigar, a box of candy, a modest lunch .  .  .  ? Is any one of these improper?  It is difficult to believe so. They are usually a courteous gesture, an expression of good will, or a simple convenience, symbolic rather than intrinsically significant. Normally they are not taken seriously by the giver nor do they mean very much to the receiver. At the point at which they do begin to mean something, however, do they not become improper? Even small gratuities can be significant if they are repeated and come to be expected .  .  .  .

Expensive gifts, lavish or frequent entertainment, paying hotel or travel costs, valuable services, inside advice as to investments, discounts and allowances in purchasing are in an entirely different category. They are clearly improper. .  .  .  . The difficulty comes in drawing the line between the innocent or proper and that which is designing or improper. At the moment a doubt arises as to propriety, the line should be drawn.4 

In 1989 the House Bipartisan Task Force on Ethics articulated an additional concern: that gifts to Members may create an appearance of impropriety that may undermine the public’s faith in government:

Regardless of any actual corruption or undue influence upon a Member or employee of Congress, the receipt of gifts or favors from private interests may affect public confidence in the integrity of the individual and in the institution of the Congress. Legitimate concerns of favoritism or abuse of public position may be raised by disclosure of frequent or expensive gifts from representatives of special interests, or valuable gifts from anyone other than a relative or personal friend.5 

In a 1994 Senate committee report on a gift reform proposal, provisions imposing special restrictions on gifts from lobbyists were justified as follows:

[I]t seems appropriate to single out registered lobbyists and foreign agents for special treatment, because this category includes people who are, by definition, in the business of seeking to influence the outcome of public policy decisions. Because registered lobbyists and foreign agents are paid to influence the actions of public officials, including legislative branch officials, their gifts are uniquely susceptible to the appearance that they are intended to purchase access or influence.6 

However, as the Douglas Subcommittee also recognized, Members and staff historically have been offered a number of gifts that do not raise any genuine ethical concern, including relatively inexpensive gifts that are presented merely as a souvenir of a visit or as a mark of honor or respect. Particularly where the offeror is either a constituent or an acquaintance who is not seeking any official action from the Member, a rule requiring Members to decline gifts of this nature could result in needless embarrassment or hurt feelings.

Since 1968 the House rules have included provisions that impose explicit limits on the ability of Members, officers and employees to accept gifts. This chapter is substantially devoted to the gift rule currently in effect. However, while the gift rule includes a number of provisions relating to travel by Members, officers and employees – including travel paid by a private source, a state or local government, or a foreign government – those gift rule provisions are addressed in the next chapter, which concerns the matter of travel generally.

Since 1989 there has been a statutory underpinning to the House gift rule. A provision of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989, codified at 5 U.S.C. § 7353, generally prohibits Federal officials, including House Members and staff, from soliciting or accepting anything of value, except as provided in rules and regulations issued by their supervising ethics office. Under that statute, both the Standards Committee and the House as a whole constitute the supervising ethics office for House Members, officers and employees. Thus the House gift rule defines the gifts that Members, officers and employees may accept consistent with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 7353.

BASIC GIFT PROHIBITIONS

The statutory gift provision, 5 U.S.C. § 7353, also reflects two key prohibitions regarding gifts that each House Member, officer and employee should be familiar with, as follows.

1. Never accept a gift that is linked to any official action you have taken, or that you are being asked to take. One provision of the gift statute states, "No gift may be accepted [pursuant to gift rules or regulations] in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act."7  Moreover, accepting a gift in these circumstances may constitute a serious violation of criminal law. The criminal statutes on bribery and illegal gratuities are summarized below (pp. *-64).

2. Never solicit a gift from any person who has interests before the House. 5 U.S.C. § 7353 limits not only what government officials may accept, but also that for which they may ask. The statute provides in pertinent part:

(a)  Except as permitted by [applicable gift rules or regulations], no Member of Congress or officer or employee of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch shall solicit or accept anything of value from a person –

(1)  seeking official action from, doing business with, or .  .  . conducting activities regulated by, the individual's employing agency; or

(2)  whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the individual's official duties. [Emphasis added.]

While the House gift rule defines what Members, officers and employees may accept in the way of gifts, the rule does not authorize them to ask for any gift. The prohibition against solicitation is very broad. It applies to the solicitation not only of money, but "anything of value." In addition, the prohibition covers solicitations of things for the personal benefit of the Member, officer or employee, as well as things that would involve no personal benefit. However, as is explained in a Standards Committee advisory memorandum of April 25, 1997, the Committee has determined that Members and staff may solicit on behalf of charitable organizations qualified under § 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, subject to certain restrictions. The Committee will consider requests to make solicitations for other purposes, but as a general rule, the Committee will not approve a solicitation that would result in any personal or financial benefit to Members and/or staff.

Example 1. An office is throwing a farewell party for a departing staff member, and the office knows of individuals in the private sector, with whom the staff member has worked, who would probably be willing to donate refreshments. The office may not request donations from those individuals.

Example 2. One of the cable channels recently showed a documentary that relates to some legislation before a committee. A committee staff person may call the company to inquire if the committee may purchase a tape of the show, but may not request a free copy.

Other prohibitions. The Code of Official Conduct prohibits a Member, officer, or employee from receiving any benefit "by virtue of influence improperly exerted from his position in Congress."8  Similarly, the Code of Ethics for Government Service (¶ 5) admonishes every Government employee, "Never discriminate unfairly by the dispensing of special favors or privileges to anyone, whether for remuneration or not; and never accept for [oneself] or [one’s] family, favors or benefits under circumstances which might be construed by reasonable persons as influencing the performance of his governmental duties."

This Committee has cautioned all Members "to avoid situations in which even an inference might be drawn suggesting improper action."9  In this regard, Members, officers and employees must always exercise discretion concerning the acceptance of gifts or favors from persons who are not relatives, and particularly gifts or favors that would not have been offered "but for" the individual’s position in Congress. Among the factors that one must consider are the source and value of a gift, the frequency of gifts from one source, the possible motives of the donor, and possible conflicts of interest with official duties.10 

GIFT RULE HISTORY

The first House Code of Official Conduct, which was approved as House Rule 43 in 1968, included, in clause 4, the first House gift rule. From 1968 to 1990, the gift rule restricted the ability of Members, officers, and employees to accept gifts from persons with a direct interest in legislation. When the Bipartisan Task Force on Ethics reviewed the gift rule in 1989, however, it found that standard to be subjective and unworkable: "It is often impractical, if not impossible, for Members to ascertain whether a donor has a direct interest in legislation, particularly in cases where the Member and donor have a long-standing personal relationship."11  The Ethics Reform Act of 1989, as amended by the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act for fiscal year 1992,12  amended the rule to eliminate the need to make this determination, and substituted instead overall limits on the value of gifts that could be accepted from virtually anyone during a year.

From January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1995, the gift rule prohibited a Member, officer, or employee from accepting gifts worth a total of more than $250 from any one source in any one year. However, under that rule, there was a range of gifts that Members and staff could accept without regard to this annual limitation, including any gift worth $100 or less, gifts of personal hospitality, and gifts from relatives.13  Also exempted from the annual limitation, pursuant to § 801(e) of the Ethics Reform Act were "gifts of food and beverages consumed not in connection with gifts of lodging," i.e., "local meals," without any restriction as to cost or the source of the payment.

From 1993 to 1995, proposals to tighten the gift rules were considered in both the House and the Senate, and in late 1995, the House approved a new gift rule that imposed significant, new limitations on the ability of Members, officers and employees to accept gifts.14  The new rule took effect on January 1, 1996 as House Rule 52. The rule was renumbered as House Rule 51 in the 105th Congress, and it was amended and renumbered as clause 5 of House Rule 26 in the 106th Congress. Its provisions as currently in effect are summarized below. As to the reasons for the action taken by the House in 1995, the report of the House Rules Committee on the proposed rule stated three:

One of the proponents of tightening the gift rule argued that the regular acceptance of meals and tickets from lobbyists was objectionable not merely because it created an appearance problem. Rather, he argued, such conduct is also objectionable because it impacts policy, albeit in a subtle and indirect way. Through such gifts, he asserted, lobbyists "are buying access, and access is power. . . . . [T]hey buy good will, even if they do not buy access directly. And good will is also power. It can mean the difference between getting your calls returned or your letter taken seriously, and that can translate to millions, even billions of dollars, at the expense of ordinary Americans who have no lobbyists to represent them."16 

The gift rule approved by the House in late 1995 differed in several respects from that approved by the Senate earlier in the year. The most significant of these was that the House rule did not include a general provision allowing the acceptance of gifts valued below a specific dollar figure. Instead, all of the categories of acceptable gifts in the House rule were descriptive categories. In contrast, the Senate gift rule that took effect on January 1, 1996 included a provision that generally allowed the acceptance of any gift valued below $50, with a limitation of less than $100 in gifts from any single source in a calendar year. However, as detailed below, at the start of the 106th Congress in 1999, the House amended its gift rule so as to incorporate this provision of the Senate rule.17 

One provision of the gift rule states that all of its provisions are to be interpreted and enforced solely by the Standards Committee (clause 5(f) of House Rule 26). That provision also authorizes the Committee to issue guidance on any matter contained in the rule.

OVERVIEW OF THE GIFT RULE

The gift rule provides that a Member, officer or employee may not knowingly accept any gift except as provided in the rule. The rule is comprehensive, i.e., a House Member or staff person may not accept anything of value from anyone – whether in one’s personal life or one’s official life – unless acceptance is allowed under one of the rule’s provisions. Thus in comparison with the gift rules previously in effect in the House, the current rule is not only more lengthy and complex, but also very different in form.

As is detailed below, the rule includes one general provision on acceptable gifts, and 23 provisions that describe additional, specific kinds of gifts that may be accepted.

A gift that satisfies all of the requirements of one of the 23 specific categories is acceptable even if its value is $50 or more, and the value of such a gift does not count against the donor’s annual gift limit established under the general gift provision.

Among the gift items as to which Members and staff need to be especially careful under the rule are small group and one-on-one meals, tickets to (or free attendance at) sporting events and shows, and recreational activities, such as a round of golf. Gifts of these kinds are rarely acceptable under one of the 23 specific categories of acceptable gifts. Instead, in most cases they are acceptable, if at all, only under the general provision allowing the acceptance of a gift valued at less than $50, subject to the annual limitation of less than $100 in gifts from any one source in any calendar year.

Discussion of each of the provisions of the House gift rule follows. A number of them are based on provisions of the Executive Branch gift rules (5 C.F.R. Part 2635, Subpart B), which were originally issued in 1992. In applying the provisions of the House gift rule, it must be borne in mind that under the House Code of Official Conduct (clause 2 of House Rule 24), Members and staff must adhere not only to the letter, but also to the spirit of the rules of the House and its committees. This requirement certainly applies with regard to the gift rule. It should also be noted that Members are entirely free to establish and maintain, for themselves and their staff, rules on the acceptance of gifts that are more restrictive than those set forth in the House gift rule.

WHAT IS A GIFT?

The rule defines the term "gift" in an extremely broad manner. Specifically, the term is defined (in clause 5(a)(2)(A) of House Rule 26) to mean the following:

a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value.

This provision goes on to state,

The term includes gifts of services, training, transportation, lodging, and meals, whether provided in kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred.

Accordingly, when a Member, officer or employee is offered a tangible item, a service, or anything else, he or she must first determine whether the item has monetary value. If it does, then the individual may accept it only in accordance with provisions of the gift rule. This is so even if the donor happened to obtain the gift without charge.

Example 1. A Member has been invited to play golf by an acquaintance who belongs to a country club, and under the rules of the club, the guest of a club member plays without any fee. Nevertheless, the Member’s use of the course would be deemed a gift to the Member from his host, having a value of the amount that the country club generally charges for a round of golf.

As a general matter, attendance at an event such as a meeting or a briefing will not be deemed to have monetary value in itself, unless the sponsoring organization charges an admission fee for the event. However, any food or refreshments served at the event do have monetary value and may be accepted only pursuant to one of the provisions of the gift rule. Accordingly, there may well be circumstances in which a Member may attend an event, but would be required to decline or to pay for a meal that is served at the event.

As detailed below, the restrictions of the gift rule do not apply to "[a]nything for which the [official] pays the market value" (clause 5(a)(3)(A) of House Rule 26). Accordingly, there can be an improper gift to a Member, officer or employee where, for example, he or she is sold property at less than market value, or receives more than market value in selling property. There can also be an improper gift where a Member or staff person is given a loan at a below-market interest rate, or, in the context of employment, where one does not provide services commensurate with the compensation paid.

WHO IS SUBJECT TO THE GIFT RULE?

In General. The rule by its terms applies to all Members, Delegates, officers and employees of the House, and the Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico.18  Under clauses 4 and 14(a) of House Rule 24, the term "officer or employee" means any individual whose compensation is disbursed by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House. In addition, under clause 14(b) of House Rule 24, individuals whose services are compensated by the House pursuant to a consultant contract are subject to the gift rule. As a general rule, a newly elected House Member becomes subject to the House rules when his or her pay and allowances begin: on January 3 for those elected in a regular election, and the day following a special election for those elected to fill a vacant seat.

The gift rule applies with full force to every employee of the House – employees in district offices as well as those in the Washington office; and permanent employees as well as non-permanent employees, including part-time employees, paid interns, and employees who are on Leave Without Pay status.

As a general matter, the gift rule does not by its terms apply to an individual who serves in a House office without being paid by the House, i.e., a volunteer, fellow or unpaid intern. (See pp. 195-200 of the House Ethics Manual on the rules governing the use of such unpaid individuals.) However, the Standards Committee strongly advises that each office utilizing the services of such an individual require that he or she adhere to all of the rules applicable to House employees, including the gift rule.

As to Executive Branch fellows, the Standards Committee understands that they continue to be bound by the gift and travel rules of their employing agency. Executive Branch employees who are detailed to a House committee under 2 U.S.C. §72a(f) should consult with both their Designated Agency Ethics Official and the Standards Committee on the rules applicable to them.

Applicability to Spouses, Family Members and Others. Under certain circumstances, a gift to a family member of a Member, officer or employee – or, for that matter, any other individual – will be deemed a gift to the official, and hence will be subject to the restrictions of the gift rule. Under clause 5(a)(2)(B)(i) of House Rule 26, a gift to a family member or another individual will be deemed to be a gift to the official where two circumstances are present:

Example 1. A Member is throwing a graduation party for her daughter. A lobbyist who does not know the Member’s daughter offers to buy her a television set having a retail price exceeding $50. The set would be considered a gift to the Member and must be declined.

Example 2. A lawyer offers tickets to a sporting event to a Member without charge. The Member does not want the tickets, and he suggests instead that the lawyer give them to a friend of the Member. In these circumstances, a gift of the tickets to the Member’s friend would be deemed a gift to the Member himself and would be permissible only if the Member himself could accept the tickets under the gift rule.

ACCEPTABLE GIFTS, IN GENERAL

Subject to the limitations noted below, a Member, officer or employee may accept a gift, other than cash or cash equivalent, having a value of less than $50. However, there is a limitation on the cumulative value of gifts that may be accepted from any one source in a calendar year, with that annual limitation being less than $100. Gifts having a value of less than $10 do not count toward the annual limit. While the rule does not require Members and staff to maintain formal records of the gifts accepted under this provision, the rule does require that Members and staff make a good faith effort to comply with its terms. (Clause 5(a)(1)(B) of House Rule 26)

The figures of $50, $100 and $10 are actually dollar limits of, respectively, $49.99, $99.99 and $9.99. Gifts of "cash or cash equivalent" are not acceptable under this provision. Hence, under this provision, one may not accept a gift of cash or, for example, a check, use of a credit card, or a security, even if the gift would be within the stated dollar limitations.

 

Application of the Rule in Specific Circumstances

In accepting any gift under this provision of the rule, a Member, officer or employee must comply with the following interpretative rules:

No "buydowns." A Member or staff person may not "buy down" the value of a gift in order to bring it within the dollar limitations of the provision.

Example 1. A staff member taken to a restaurant by a corporate official may not order an expensive meal and simply pay his host the amount by which the bill for his food and beverages exceeds $49.99. If the bill for his food and beverages exceeds $49.99, he must pay the entire bill himself.

Example 2. A Member is offered a skybox ticket to a football game that is valued, for gift rule purposes, at $60. The Member may not accept the ticket simply by paying the offeror $11. If the Member wishes to accept the ticket, he must pay the offeror $60.

Example 3. During the year, a staff member has accepted meals and other gifts from a corporation, each of which had a value of $10 or more, and the cumulative value of which is $85. The staff member may not then accept a meal having a value of $20 from that corporation simply by paying the corporation $6. Instead, he must either decline the meal or personally pay its cost in full.

However, where an individual is offered a gift with a value of $50 or more that is naturally divisible – such as multiple tickets to an event, or bottles of wine – the individual may accept one or more items that total less than $50 in value and either pay market value for or decline the others.

Example 4. A staff person is offered four tickets to a baseball game, each having a value of $15. The staff person may accept three of the tickets, but he must either decline or pay the full price of the fourth ticket.

The "source" of a gift. A gift received from an individual affiliated with an organization – such as a member of a law firm or an employee of a corporation – counts against the annual gift limitation of both the individual and the organization.

Example 5. A committee staff person accepts a lunch valued at $15 from a member of a lobbying firm. Both the individual lobbyist and the lobbying firm are deemed to be the "source" of the lunch, and the annual gift limit of both for that staff person will be reduced accordingly.

"Simultaneous gifts." Generally, when multiple items, each individually worth less than $50, are offered simultaneously to any individual, the "gift" being offered is deemed to be the aggregate of all the items.

Example 6. A corporation sends a Member a box of samples of its products. The box includes 6 products, each of which has a value of about $10.00. The box cannot be accepted under this provision, as its total value exceeds the per-gift limit of less than $50.

Example 7. A corporate official offers two tickets to a show, each with a face value of $40, for the use of a Member and his wife. The Member may not accept both tickets under this provision, as the value of the gift would be $80, and hence in excess of the less-than-$50 limit. (But see also the statement above on "naturally divisible" gifts such as tickets, and the note below (on p. *) on the different rule that applies to meals offered to a Member or staff person and spouse or dependent at the same time and place.)

Valuation of gifts. As is generally the case under the gift rule, items are valued at their retail, rather than wholesale price. The lowest price at which an item is available to the public may be used. However, for the purpose of simplicity, tax that would be imposed on the sale of the item, as well as gratuities, are excluded in determining the value of any gift.

For further information on the valuation of gifts – including tickets to sporting events and shows – see the section below entitled "Pay Market Value for the Gift," on pages *-58.

Recipient of a gift. At times a question may arise as to who is the recipient of a gift: a Member, or individual members of his or her staff. As a general matter, this question is to be decided according to the expressed intent of the donor. Thus, for example, where an individual delivers several tickets to a sporting event to an office and indicates that the tickets are for use by the staff, the tickets are treated as a gift to each individual staff person who uses them, rather than as a single gift to the Member. If, however, the donor indicates that the tickets are for the Member’s use, all of the tickets will be treated as a gift to the Member.

A different rule applies, however, in at least two circumstances:

In both of these instances, the food or other benefits provided to the staff members are treated as one gift to the employing Member, valued at their total fair market retail value. Any such gift is acceptable only if its total value is less than $50, and the Member may not accept gifts from that source having a value of $100 or more in a calendar year. Thus, for example, if a company sends six $10 pizzas to a committee staff, the food would be deemed a gift to the committee chairman valued at $60 and hence could not be accepted.

Two other points should be made here, one on food sent to a House office, and the other on team sponsorship. First, even if a gift of food sent to a House office complies with the dollar limits of the gift rule (i.e., has a value of less than $50), staff members may not accept such a gift from a person having a direct interest in particular legislation that the staff is working on at the time. Acceptance of such a gift in these circumstances may implicate the illegal gratuities statute, which prohibits acceptance of gifts for or because of an official act. Second, with regard to sponsorship of a House office team, an offer of an outsider to pay any league entry fee may not be accepted.

Adhering to the spirit of the rule. Under the House Code of Official Conduct, Members and staff must adhere to the spirit as well as the letter of the Rules of the House (clause 2 of House Rule 24). To repeatedly accept gifts valued at under $10 from a source would violate the spirit of the gift rule and hence be impermissible.

 

Relationship of the General Provision on Acceptable Gifts to the Specific Provisions

Where a gift satisfies each of the requirements of any of the specific provisions of the gift rule on acceptable gifts – for example, a book under the "informational materials" provision (clause 5(a)(3)(I) of House Rule 26) – the gift may be accepted even if its value is $50 or more. Furthermore, in that circumstance, the value of the gift does not count against the donor’s annual gift limitation of less than $100.

Under another provision of the gift rule (clause 5(a)(2)(B)(ii) of House Rule 26), where a meal is provided to a Member or staff member and his or her spouse or dependent at the same time and place, only the value of the meal provided to the Member or staff member is treated as a gift and counts against the dollar limitations of this provision.

OTHER ACCEPTABLE GIFTS

The various specific categories of gifts that Members, officers and employees may accept under the gift rule are set forth in clause 5(a)(3) of House Rule 26. These categories may be summarized as follows.

 

Gifts Given on the Basis of

A Member, officer or employee may accept anyPersonal Friendship gift that is given by an individual on the basis of personal friendship, unless the official has reason to believe that, under the circumstances, the gift was provided because of his or her official position with the House, and not because of the personal friendship (clause 5(a)(3)(D) of House Rule 26). However, a gift exceeding $250 in value – including, for example, a trip – may not be accepted on the basis of personal friendship unless the Standards Committee issues a written determination that the personal friendship provision applies (clause 5(a)(5) of House Rule 26).

This provision of the gift rule further states that in determining whether a gift is provided on the basis of personal friendship, a Member or staff person must consider the circumstances under which the gift was offered, such as (1) the history of his or her relationship with the donor, including any previous exchange of gifts, (2) whether, to the official’s knowledge, the donor personally paid for the gift, or whether the donor sought a tax deduction or business reimbursement for it, and (3) whether, to the official’s knowledge, the donor at the same time gave the same or similar gifts to other Members or staff.

The word "friend" may be used in different ways, and at times this provision of the gift rule has been mischaracterized as requiring Members and staff to decide who is, and who is not, a "friend." Instead, where a Member or staff person wishes to rely on this provision of the rule, he or she must consider each gift individually – whether a meal, tickets to a game, or anything else – and he or she must determine whether that particular gift was offered "on the basis of personal friendship." That determination is to be made using the criteria set forth in the rule.

Quite obviously, where the offeror is a lobbyist or someone else who has interests before Congress, Members, officers and employees have the most reason to be concerned about whether a gift is offered for a reason other than personal friendship. In that circumstance, the criteria set forth in the rule are especially helpful. For example, if the gift was paid for by a business or will be charged to a firm or corporate credit card – as opposed to being paid for out of the offeror’s own pocket – it is likely that the gift is based on business concerns, rather than personal friendship.19  Likewise, if, in a relationship, all of the gifts have gone to the Member or staff person, and there has not been reciprocal gift giving, it is likely that the gifts have a business purpose. Thus, where a Member or staff person is offered a gift by a lobbyist or someone else who has interests before Congress and either of these circumstances is present (i.e., the gift is not paid for personally, or there has not been reciprocal gift-giving), the official should not accept the gift on the basis of the personal friendship provision. Unless the gift is acceptable under another provision of the gift rule, the Member or staff person should either decline the gift, or pay for it personally.

As noted above, where a Member, officer or employee wishes to accept a gift on the basis of the personal friendship provision, and the value of the gift exceeds $250, the official must first obtain the written approval of the Standards Committee. This requirement may apply where, for example, one wishes to accept a friend’s invitation to go on a vacation trip. (However, gifts from one’s fiancé or fiancée are acceptable under the rule’s provision on gifts from relatives, and so the requirements of the personal friendship provision need not be observed regarding those gifts.)

The Standards Committee will grant written approval for a personal friendship gift exceeding $250 in value only in response to a written request. The request should identify the donor and briefly describe the history of the relationship and the nature of the gift. The request should also state whether the donor will be paying for the gift personally. Under Committee Rule 3(i), the Committee keeps confidential any such request and the Committee’s response. (Indeed, this confidentiality requirement applies to any advisory opinion request made by a Member, officer or employee and the response thereto.) However, as noted below in the section on "Gift Disclosure," Members and officers, as well as employees who are required to file a Financial Disclosure Statement, will have to disclose any gift exceeding $260 in value on their statement, unless the Committee grants a waiver of the reporting requirement.

 

Attendance at Events (including meals)

Under provisions of the gift rule and related general waivers granted by the Standards Committee, Members, officers and employees may accept invitations to the following kinds of events, provided that certain requirements are satisfied:

Members and staff can accept a meal at these kinds of events, provided that the applicable requirements are satisfied. The circumstances in which an invitation to these events may be accepted are detailed below. As will be seen, one common limitation in these gift rule provisions and waivers is that invitations can be accepted only from the organization that is actually sponsoring the event. An invitation cannot be accepted from an individual or organization that merely bought a block of tickets to or a table at the event.

"Widely Attended" Events. The gift rule provision on widely attended events can apply to a broad range of events: a convention, conference, symposium, forum, panel discussion, dinner, viewing, reception,20  and similar events (clause 5(a)(4)(A) of House Rule 26). An offer of free attendance21  at such an event can be accepted where three requirements are satisfied: (1) the event is "widely attended," as defined below, (2) the invitation came from the sponsor of the event, and (3) the attendance of the Member or staff person is related to his or her official duties.

As to the first of these requirements, the Standards Committee has determined that an event is "widely attended" if (a) there is a reasonable expectation that at least 25 persons, other than Members, officers or employees of Congress, will attend the event, and (b) attendance at the event is open to individuals from throughout a given industry or profession, or those in attendance represent a range of persons interested in a given matter.22  Individuals who are officials of other branches or levels of government count toward the required minimum of twenty-five, but spouses and others who accompany the congressional members and staff do not count toward the required minimum.

The types of events that typically satisfy this first requirement are Chamber of Commerce and Rotary Club lunches and dinners, and meetings of the membership of trade or professional associations.

Example 1. One of the departments of a large corporation has a weekly staff meeting and luncheon that is attended by at least 30 employees. These meetings do not constitute a widely attended event as that term is used in the gift rule, however, because attendance at the event is not open to individuals from throughout a given industry or profession, and those present do not represent a range of persons interested in a given matter.

As to the second requirement, the term "sponsor" refers to the person, entity or entities that are primarily responsible for organizing the event. An individual or entity that merely contributes money to an event is not considered to be a sponsor of the event for purposes of the gift rule. Elaboration on this requirement appears below, in the section entitled "Source of Invitations for Widely Attended and Charity Events."

The third requirement is satisfied where (a) the Member, officer or employee will be participating in the event by speaking or performing a ceremonial role, or (b) he or she determines that attendance at the event is appropriate to the performance of his or her official duties or representative function. The responsibility for making this determination rests with the invited Member or officer, or the invited employee and his or her employing Member, but the determination must be made in a reasonable manner. Some relevant factors might include the opportunity to meet with constituents at the event, the desirability of representing one’s constituency at an event where other elected or appointed officials will be present, or the opportunity to present or receive information that is pertinent to one’s district or to a legislative proposal. With regard to a staff member, the nature of his or her duties in the office will be a relevant factor. For example, attendance at a dinner sponsored by an environmental organization may well be appropriate for a staff member who handles environmental issues, but not for a staff member who handles banking issues only.

In deciding whether attending an event would be appropriate to the individual’s official duties, one must also bear in mind the legislative history of the gift rule, which states that an event may not be merely for the personal pleasure or entertainment of the Member or staff person.23  Accordingly, an invitation that would involve nothing more than viewing a sporting event, a movie or a show will rarely be acceptable under the widely attended event provision.

Example 2. Knowing that a district office staff person is a fan of his team, the owner of a local sports team offers the staff person free tickets to an upcoming game. Even though the source of the tickets would be the event sponsor, and there will be far more than 25 individuals in attendance at the game, the staff person may not accept the tickets under the widely attended event provision, in that his attendance would bear no relationship to the performance of his official duties.

Example 3. A new concert hall is opening in Member A’s district. The symphony invites a number of officials, including Member A, to attend the inaugural concert, sit in a place of honor, and be recognized for their help in making the new hall a reality. In view of the circumstances, Member A may reasonably determine that it is appropriate to his official duties or representative function to attend, and that hence the invitation is acceptable under the widely attended event provision.

Example 4. Member B has announced that this will be her last term in office. In honor of her career, a group of corporations and associations is hosting a dinner for her, to which hundreds of people from the private and public sectors, including many House Members and staff, will be invited. Those who deem their attendance at the dinner to be appropriate to their official duties or representative function may accept an invitation to the dinner from the host committee.

Where the requirements of the widely attended event provision are satisfied, a Member or staff person may also accept a sponsor’s unsolicited offer of free attendance at the event for an accompanying individual (clause 5(a)(4)(B) of House Rule 26). While the accompanying individual need not be the spouse or child of the invitee – it may be, for example, a friend or a colleague – the rule provides for only one accompanying individual. Thus, for example, an invitee may not accept an offer of free attendance for both his or her spouse and child under this provision.

Charity Fundraising Events. Subject to the restrictions noted below, a Member, officer or employee may accept an offer of free attendance24  at a charity event (clause 5(A)(4)(C) of House Rule 26). This provision extends to charity events such as lunches, dinners, golf or tennis tournaments, races, and cook-offs. The purpose of the charity event provision of the gift rule is to enable Members and staff "to lend their names to legitimate charitable enterprises and otherwise promote charitable goals."25  The restrictions that apply to attendance at such events are four-fold, as follows.

First, in order to be a "charity event" as that term is used in the rule, the primary purpose of the event must be to raise funds for an organization that is qualified under section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code to receive tax deductible contributions. In other words, the event must be a bona fide charity fundraiser. While charity events may take different forms, generally speaking such an event will be one to which invitations are issued and for which individuals are charged set rates to attend.

Example 5. Each year a group of businesspersons chips in money for a golf outing, and if there are any funds left after payment of expenses, they donate the excess to charity. This outing would not qualify as a charity event for purposes of the rule, in that its primary purpose is not to raise funds for charity.

Example 6. A lobbying firm wishes to hold a dinner for Members and staff, at which it will announce that the firm has made a substantial donation to charity. The dinner would not qualify as a charity event for purposes of the rule, in that its primary purpose is not to raise funds for charity.

Example 7. For the same reason, the regular performances of a theater that is organized under § 501(c)(3) of the Tax Code are not deemed to be charity events. However, such an entity may have a special fundraising performance that would qualify as a charity event.

Second, as noted above, Members and staff may accept an invitation to a charity event only from the sponsor of the event. As with widely attended events, the sponsor of a charity event is the person or persons primarily responsible for organizing the event, and a person who simply contributes money or buys tickets to an event is not considered a sponsor of that event. This matter is elaborated on below, in the section entitled "Source of Invitations for Widely Attended and Charity Events."

Third, the sponsor’s invitation to attend the event must be unsolicited.

Fourth, the rule specifically prohibits Members and staff from accepting reimbursement for transportation or lodging in connection with their attendance at any charity event. Local transportation may be accepted from the event sponsor, however.

Where the requirements of the charity event provision are satisfied, a Member or staff person may also accept an unsolicited invitation to the event for his or her spouse or a dependent.

"Free Attendance" for Purposes of Widely Attended and Charity Events. The gift rule provides that where the requirements set forth above are satisfied, Members, officers and employees may accept "free attendance" at the event. As used in the rule, free attendance includes "waiver of all or part of a conference or other fee, the provision of local transportation, or the provision of food, refreshments, entertainment, and instructional materials furnished to all attendees as an integral part of the event." (clause 5(a)(4)(D) of House Rule 26). However, this term does not include either "entertainment collateral to the event," or "food or refreshments taken other than in a group setting with all or substantially all other attendees." (id.).

Example 8. In connection with its annual meeting in Washington, an association will hold a banquet and has arranged for the attendees to see a show at a downtown theater. Upon invitation from the association, a Member may attend the banquet if the requirements for a "widely attended" event are satisfied. However, he may not attend the show under this provision, in that it is not part of the banquet, but is instead entertainment that is collateral to that event.

Example 9. A charity will be holding a fundraising reception, and immediately after the reception the charity will hold a dinner to which only certain VIP’s will be invited. A Member may accept an invitation from the charity to attend the reception under the charity event provision, but he could not attend the dinner under that provision.

At times at charity fundraising events in particular, the sponsor may offer attendees a souvenir, gift or prize. A Member or staff person may accept a baseball cap or T-shirt from the event sponsor under the "nominal value" provision of the gift rule, which is summarized below. In addition, under the general provision on acceptable gifts, as explained above, the official may also accept an item that has a value of less than $50 (provided that he or she has not accepted other gifts from the sponsor that would cause the annual gift limit of less than $100 per source to be exceeded).

In charity golf tournaments, the sponsor may also offer so-called "skill" prizes, such as for the lowest score in the tournament, or for a hole-in-one. As a general matter, such prizes may be accepted, provided that most of the attendees at the event are individuals other than Members of Congress or staff and their guests. However, such prizes are deemed to be earned income, and they count against the outside earned income limitation applicable to Members and senior staff. In addition, the prizes must be disclosed as earned income on the Financial Disclosure Statement of any individual who is required to file one (Members, officers and senior staff).

Source of Invitations for Widely Attended and Charity Events. The gift rule is clear that Members, officers and employees may accept an invitation to a widely attended or charity event only from the sponsor of the event. The report of the House Rules Committee on the gift rule defines the term "sponsor" as follows:

The term ‘sponsor of the event’ refers to the person, entity, or entities that are primarily responsible for organizing the event. An individual who simply contributes money to an event is not considered to be a sponsor of the event.26 

Accordingly, under the gift rule, the term "sponsor" has a definition that is narrower than the manner in which it is commonly used. Often the large financial supporters of an event are termed as "sponsors" of the event. However, such entities are not sponsors of an event for purposes of the gift rule unless they also have a substantial role in organizing the event.27 

Example 10. Foundation A, a § 501(c)(3) organization under the Tax Code, organizes a $1,000-per-plate fundraising dinner to support its charitable activities. Member B may accept complimentary tickets to the dinner from Foundation A, for himself and his spouse, under the charity event provision.

Example 11. Corporation C buys a table at the fundraising dinner of Foundation A. Member B may not accept tickets to the dinner from Corporation C under the charity event provision. In accordance with the previous example, Member B may accept tickets from Foundation A, and if it chooses to do so, Foundation A may seat B at the corporation’s table.

Contributors to a widely attended or charity event may request that the sponsor invite particular Members or staff to sit with them at the event. However, the invitation will not be acceptable under these provisions unless the sponsor retains ultimate control of the guest list and the seating arrangements, and the invitation neither references any contributor nor is extended by anyone other than the sponsor. Put another way, all communications with Members or staff regarding the event should be made by the event sponsor, because a communication from an event contributor may be deemed an impermissible invitation from the contributor.

The Standards Committee has made an exception to the above rules on the proper source of invitations for the large media-related events that take place in Washington, such as the White House Correspondents’ Dinner sponsored by the Correspondents’ Association. Traditionally invitations to those events are extended not by the sponsoring organization, but instead by journalists and/or news organizations that are members of the sponsoring organization. Accordingly, the Committee has granted a general gift rule waiver to enable a House Member or staff person to accept an offer of free attendance at one of these media-related events from a journalist or a news organization that is a member of the media organization sponsoring the event.

Fundraising or Campaign Events Sponsored by Political Organizations. Members, officers and employees may accept food, refreshments and other benefits provided by a political organization in connection with a fundraising or campaign event sponsored by that organization (clause 5(a)(3)(G)(iii) of House Rule 26). Under this provision, Members, officers and employees may also accept transportation and lodging from the sponsoring political organization in connection with such an event, but the matter of travel is addressed in the next chapter of this booklet. The term "political organization" is defined in this provision by reference to § 527(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.28 

Under this provision of the gift rule, like the provisions concerning widely attended and charity fundraising events, Members and staff may accept an invitation only from the event sponsor. They may not accept a ticket from a person that has simply donated money or purchased tickets to the event.

Example 12. Members and staff may accept complimentary tickets to a Republican National Committee fundraising dinner from the RNC.

Example 13. A political action committee buys a table at a DCCC fundraising dinner. A House staff member may not accept a ticket to the dinner from the PAC under this provision of the gift rule.

Educational Events. Soon after the gift rule took effect, the Standards Committee recognized that there are certain events that are worthwhile for Members or staff to attend, but that do not meet the numeric requirement for widely attended events (i.e., at least 25 non-congressional attendees). Among such events are those designed for a small group in order to facilitate discussion. Accordingly, the Committee granted a general gift rule waiver allowing Members and staff to accept invitations to events (including meals offered as part of these events) that, while they do not meet the numeric requirement for widely attended events, are

As under the gift rule provisions summarized above regarding events, Members and staff may accept such an invitation from the event sponsor only.

In keeping with the gift rule’s intent, this waiver does not extend to meals in connection with presentations sponsored by lobbyists, lobbying firms or advocacy groups. Moreover, this waiver does not extend to meals in connection with legislative briefings or strategy sessions, even if the sponsoring entity has educational status under the Tax Code.

Example 14. A non-partisan, non-profit "think tank" hosts a luncheon series featuring distinguished speakers from academia discussing foreign policy topics. The organization invites about 15 individuals to each luncheon, including some House staff members. The staff members may attend and accept the lunch under this waiver.

Example 15. A trade association establishes a non-profit educational foundation. The foundation sponsors a monthly forum at which experts from the field explain aspects of their industry and the ramifications of various legislative proposals for that industry. A dozen House staff members are invited to these presentations, which occur over lunch. The staff members may attend, but they may not accept the lunch under the terms of this waiver. This is so because these events are legislative briefings, and as noted above, this waiver does not extend to such events.

Events with Constituent Organizations. The Standards Committee has also recognized that the gift rule was not intended to interfere with Members carrying out their conventional representational duties, and that meetings or events with constituent organizations may sometimes be attended by only a few constituents, particularly where the organization is from a state with a small or diffuse population. Such events may not satisfy the numeric requirement for widely attended events.

Accordingly, the Committee has also granted a general waiver for Members and staff to accept free attendance (including meals) at meetings or events sponsored by constituent organizations, regardless of the number of constituents in attendance or the location of the event, provided that the meeting or event is:

Examples of constituent organizations covered by this waiver include, but are not limited to, civic associations, senior citizens organizations, veterans groups, and business, trade or professional associations (for example, associations of lawyers, nurses, bankers, teachers, or farmers).

Example 16. A civic association in a small town in Member A’s district invites him to one of its periodic luncheon meetings of its membership. If the Member determines that his attendance would be related to his official duties or representative function, he may attend and accept the lunch under this waiver.

Example 17. A veterans group in Member B’s district invites her to a Veterans Day dinner with its members at the local VFW hall. If B determines that her attendance would be related to her official duties or representative function, she may attend and accept the dinner.

Example 18. The real estate agents association of a state holds its annual Washington "fly-in." All members of the association are invited, and usually about 20 agents come. One of the events on the agenda is a dinner for the congressional delegation. Each delegation member who determines that attendance would be related to his or her official duties or representative function may attend and accept the dinner.

Example 19. A real estate agent comes to Washington for the association "fly-in" described in the previous example. He is the only agent from Member C’s district who makes the trip, and he would like to have lunch with his representative. Since the lunch is not an association event, the Member cannot accept the lunch under this waiver.

 

Food or Refreshments of Nominal Value (Attendance at Receptions)

Members, officers and employees may accept "[f]ood or refreshments of a nominal value offered other than as a part of a meal" (clause 5(a)(3)(U) of House Rule 26). Under this provision, the kinds of food and refreshments usually offered at receptions (such as hors d’oeuvres, appetizers and beverages), and morning meetings (coffee, juice, pastry or bagels), may be accepted.29 

However, the limitations of this provision should also be noted. The provision does not allow the acceptance of a meal, or of food or refreshments offered as part of a meal. Thus even a low-cost meal (for example, sandwiches or hot dogs) may not be accepted under this provision. In addition, the provision does not allow the acceptance of food or refreshments that exceed "a nominal value." As to food or refreshments having a value greater than the examples given above, a question can arise as to whether their value is "nominal."

Example 1. At times when the House is in session late, an association with which the office has worked will send over pizzas for the staff. The pizzas are not within the terms of this provision and may not be accepted under it. (See also pp.*-19 above.)

 

Meal or Local Transportation Incident to a Visit to a Business Site

The Standards Committee has recognized that at times in the course of performing one’s official duties at House expense, a Member or staff person will be offered a de minimis amount of food or transportation as a courtesy. For example, one might be offered a meal in the company cafeteria while touring a facility in one’s district, or a ride from the airport to a site being visited as part of a committee-sponsored trip. In the Committee’s view, the acceptance of such occasional, incidental courtesies does not violate the spirit of the gift rule. Accordingly, the Committee has granted a general waiver of the gift rule to enable a Member, officer or employee to accept the following items incidental to legitimate official activity:

However, this waiver does not extend to car service made available from the same source on a regular basis, transportation in the District of Columbia, or meals at the Washington, D.C.-area offices of lobbying or law firms.

In addition, acceptance of these items will not be deemed to violate the prohibition against private subsidy of official activities (formerly House Rule 45, and now set forth in clauses 1-3 of House Rule 25). In this regard, it should be stressed that this waiver applies where a Member or staff person is traveling in his or her own district, or is traveling elsewhere at House expense. As is detailed in the chapter on travel, where a Member or staff person is taking an officially related trip at the expense of a private source consistent with the provisions of the gift rule, he or she may generally accept meals and transportation from that source without the limitations noted above. However, where officially related travel is appropriately paid for by a private source, all of the expenses paid by the private source must be publicly disclosed.

 

An Item of Nominal Value

Members, officers and employees may accept "[a]n item of nominal value such as a greeting card, baseball cap, or a T-shirt" (clause 5(a)(3)(W) of House Rule 26). Through the 105th Congress, the Committee permitted Members and staff to accept a variety of low value, tangible items under this provision. With the adoption of the general gift rule provision at the start of the 106th Congress, however, such a reading of the nominal value provision is no longer appropriate. Accordingly, as a general matter, Members and staff should not rely on the nominal value provision in accepting any item having a value of $10 or more, except for the items that are explicitly referred to in that provision, i.e., a baseball cap or a T-shirt. Instead, any such item will count against the donor’s annual gift limit.

Example 1. A baseball team in a Member’s district sends the office eight of its baseball caps along with a letter suggesting that one be given to the Member and to each staff person who wants one. The Member and the staff persons may each accept one of the caps under the nominal value provision.

 

Commemorative Items

"A plaque, trophy, or other item that is substantially commemorative in nature and that is intended for presentation" may be accepted (clause 5(a)(3)(S) of House Rule 26). There are several points to note regarding this provision.

First, in contrast to other provisions of the gift rule, this one refers to "presentation," and thus the concept of the provision is that there will be an in-person presentation of the item to the Member or staff person.

Second, in order to be acceptable under this provision, an item must be "substantially commemorative in nature." Usually there is little question as to the commemorative nature of a plaque or trophy.30  As to other items that may be presented to a Member or staff person at an event – for example, an expensive pen or a crystal bowl – such items are not commemorative in nature merely because they were presented at an event. Instead, in order to fall within this provision, an item must have some commemorative characteristic or feature. It would be impossible to enumerate all of the features that would cause an item to be deemed commemorative, but an item that is inscribed or engraved with the Member’s name, the name of the presenting organization, and the date of the presentation will likely be deemed commemorative in nature.

Finally, as a general matter, the items acceptable under this provision may not have significant utilitarian or artistic value. Thus, for example, a television set would not be acceptable under this provision, no matter how elaborate an inscription appears on the item. The types of items that can be accepted under this provision, if commemorative in nature by reason of an inscription or otherwise, include a framed photo or print, a figurine, or a clock.

Where a Member or staff person is presented with an item of unusually high value, or receives information that a group intends to present an item of such value, the official should contact the Standards Committee for guidance. A commemorative item that exceeds $260 in value will have to be disclosed on Schedule VI of one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement (see the section on "Gift Disclosure" below).

Example 1. After a Member speaks at an event, the sponsoring organization presents him with an expensive pen that is inscribed with his name only. The pen is not acceptable under this provision, because with the inscription being limited to the Member’s name, the pen is not commemorative in nature.

Example 2. A Member visits an Indian tribe, and during her visit, the tribal leaders present her with a blanket that was hand-woven by members of the tribe. Because the blanket has a traditional tribal design, the Member may accept it as a commemorative item.

Example 3. An aircraft manufacturer in a Member’s district sends the Member, through the mail, a high-quality model of one of the airplanes it builds. While the Member probably could have accepted the model as a commemorative item had it been presented to him in person, he may not accept it under this provision since it was merely mailed to him.

 

Books, Periodicals and Other Informational Materials

A Member, officer or employee may accept "[i]nformational materials that are sent to [his or her] office . . . in the form of books, articles, periodicals, other written materials, audiotapes, videotapes, or other forms of communication" (clause 5(a)(3)(I) of House Rule 26). The purpose of this provision is to ensure that Members have access to information sources or reference tools useful in the conduct of official duties. Several points should be noted regarding informational materials.

First, under long-standing Committee guidance, a subscription to a periodical may be accepted only from the publisher or distributor of the periodical. In other words, Members and staff may not accept a gift subscription that was paid for by a third party.

Second, the provision specifies that informational materials "sent to the office" may be accepted. The intent of this language is that a Member or staff person may not accept, under this provision, an additional courtesy copy of a publication that is sent to his or her home.31  The intent of that language is not to preclude acceptance of a book or other appropriate informational material at, for example, a reception or other event.

Third, while the provision allows acceptance of a set of materials (such as, for example, the PBS video series The Civil War), it does not permit acceptance of specialized reporting services or other collections that are periodically updated, such as the U.S. Code annotated or an encyclopedia.

Fourth, at times a Member is offered multiple copies of a book or similar item for the purpose of distributing the copies to his or her colleagues or others. As a general matter, a Member may accept multiple copies of an item in these circumstances, provided that the copies are intended for distribution to a particular audience and are not for the Member’s unrestricted use, and provided further that the item was not created especially for the Member.

Finally, at times a Member, officer or employee may be offered computer software. Neither application software (for example, Microsoft Word or WordPerfect), developmental software (that is, software that enables one to generate or edit code), nor entertainment software is acceptable under this provision of the gift rule, as such materials do not constitute informational materials within the meaning of this provision. Informational software may be acceptable, but only if the database is entirely self-contained (i.e., on a compact disc). Software that provides access to a database that otherwise is available only on a subscription basis (for example, LEXIS-NEXIS or Westlaw) is not acceptable under this provision. (However, demonstration or evaluation copies of software that a business generally makes available to prospective customers may be acceptable under a different gift rule provision (see the section below entitled "Widely Available Opportunities and Benefits").)

 

Things Paid for by the Federal Government, or by a State or Local Government

"Anything that is paid for by the Federal Government, by a State or local government, or secured by the Government under a Government contract" is acceptable (clause 5(a)(3)(O) of House Rule 26). This is a broad provision, which extends to tangible items of all kinds, as well as meals, services, and travel – provided, however, that the gift is paid for by a government agency or entity. Insofar as this provision concerns in-kind services provided by a Federal, state or local government agency, this provision mirrors the Standards Committee’s interpretation of the ban on unofficial office accounts (clauses 1-3 of House Rule 25) under which Members and staff may accept in-kind services and functions from government agencies for official House activities.

Example 1. A state university in a Member’s district offers the Member tickets to an upcoming home game of one of its teams. The Member may accept the tickets under this provision. (However, as a general matter, sporting event tickets may be accepted from a private university only under the general provision on acceptable gifts, i.e., if their value is less than $50, and a cumulative value of less than $100 from a single source in a calendar year.)

The "paid for by" language of this provision is especially important. Thus, under this provision, Members and staff may not accept a gift from a government agency where the gift was donated to the agency by a third party, and the agency is merely acting as a conduit. In addition, Members and staff may not accept, under this provision, a meal or other gift that is paid for by an outside consultant or lobbyist for a government agency – even though the cost of the gift will ultimately be reimbursed by the government.32 

At times a question may arise as to whether a particular entity is a government agency for purposes of this provision. An entity is a government agency for purposes of this provision only if, under the law, it is treated as a government agency for other purposes. For example, statutory law provides that Amtrak is not a department, agency or instrumentality of the United States Government (49 U.S.C. § 24301(a)(3)), and thus Amtrak is not a government agency for purposes of this gift rule provision.

The commonwealths and territories of the United States are deemed to be part of the Federal Government and hence are treated as government entities.

However, Indian tribes are not treated as a state or local government for purposes of the gift rule. The Standards Committee considered this matter carefully and found nothing in the legislative history of the current gift rule or its predecessors indicating an intent to treat Indian tribes as state or local government entities for these purposes.

The language of this provision regarding things secured by the Government under a Government contract applies, by its terms, only to things secured under a contract of the Federal Government. This language was derived from a comparable provision of the gift regulations that govern the Executive Branch (5 C.F.R. § 2635.203(b)(7)). The stated intent of that provision was to cover only items that "the Government procures for use by its employees under a Government contract or knowingly obligates itself to pay for" (57 Fed. Reg. 35,014 (1992)) – for example, a health club membership that the owner of a building in which the Government leases space makes available to building tenants.

Gifts from Foreign Governments and International Organizations

Members, officers and employees may accept "[a]n item, the receipt of which is authorized by the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act, or any other statute" (clause 5(a)(3)(N) of House Rule 26).

Special rules apply to gifts from foreign governments. This is so because the Constitution prohibits Government officials, including Members and employees of Congress, from receiving "any present  .  .  . of any kind whatever" from a foreign state or a representative of a foreign government without the consent of the Congress.33  Congress has consented, through the vehicles of the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act (FGDA)34  and the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act (MECEA)35 , to the acceptance of certain gifts from foreign governments. The FGDA defines "foreign government" to include not only foreign governments per se, but also international or multinational organizations whose membership is composed of units of foreign governments, and any agent or representative of such a government or organization while acting as such.36  That Act also covers gifts from "quasi-governmental" organizations closely affiliated with, or funded by, a foreign government.

Because MECEA concerns only travel funded by foreign governments, it is covered in the chapter on travel. The FGDA provisions concerning the acceptance of travel and travel expenses are likewise addressed in the travel chapter.

In addition to its travel provisions, however, the FGDA authorizes House Members, officers and employees to accept "a gift of minimal value tendered as a souvenir or mark of courtesy."37  Under implementing regulations issued by this Committee,38  the term "minimal value" as used in the Act is currently defined, by reference to a statutory formula, as $260.39 

This provision on minimal value gifts clearly applies to gifts of tangible items. In addition, the Standards Committee has interpreted this provision to permit Members and staff to accept, from a foreign government, meals, entertainment and local travel in the United States when related to official duties. However, since providing lodging in the United States is not normally viewed as within the realm of diplomatic courtesy, it may not be accepted. Similarly, the Committee’s interpretation does not allow the acceptance of such meals, entertainment or local travel offered by a lobbyist or agent of a foreign government, because such gifts are not properly deemed as having been "tendered as a souvenir or mark of courtesy" as required by the FGDA.

Example 1. An embassy in Washington has invited a Member to attend a dinner at the embassy. The Member may accept the invitation under the minimal value provision of the FGDA.

Example 2. An embassy official in Washington has invited a staff member to lunch at a local restaurant to discuss pending legislation concerning his country. The staff member may accept the invitation under the minimal value provision of the FGDA.

Example 3. An attorney who is a registered foreign agent has invited a staff member to lunch to discuss pending legislation concerning his client. The staff member may not accept the lunch.

The FGDA further allows a Member or staff person to accept (but not to retain) a gift of more than minimal value, as defined above, when refusal of the gift "would likely cause offense or embarrassment or otherwise adversely affect the foreign relations of the United States."40  Such gifts, however, are deemed to be accepted on behalf of the United States and become the property of the United States. Within 60 days of accepting such a gift, a Member or staff person must turn the gift over to the Clerk of the House for disposal or, with the consent of this Committee, the recipient may retain the gift for display in his or her office or other official use.41 

At the time such a gift is deposited for disposal or official use, the recipient must also complete and sign a foreign gifts disclosure form, and file it with the Standards Committee.42  The form is reprinted as one of the appendices to this booklet, and copies are also available from the Committee office or its Web site, www.house.gov/ethics. If a Member or employee is uncertain whether the value of a gift exceeds "minimal value" as defined above, the Clerk’s office can arrange for an appraisal.43  Under the Committee’s foreign gifts regulations, the disclosure statements filed by Members and employees are publicly available at the Committee’s office, and their contents are published annually in the Federal Register.44 

Additionally, the FDGA allows a Member or employee to accept a gift of an educational scholarship or medical treatment from a foreign government.45 

Benefits Resulting from Outside Business and Other Activities

Subject to two restrictions that are described below, Members, officers and employees may accept benefits (including food and refreshments) that result from any of the following activities:

The restrictions on the acceptance of such benefits are that (1) the benefits may not have been offered or enhanced because of the official position of the Member or staff person, and (2) they must be benefits that are "customarily provided to others in similar circumstances" (clause 5(a)(3)(G)(i) of House Rule 26). (This provision also allows the acceptance of transportation and lodging under the same terms, but the matter of travel is addressed in the next chapter of this booklet.)

This is a common-sense provision that allows Members and staff to accept things of value that essentially have nothing to do with their position with the House, but instead are the result of outside business or other activities. However, before accepting anything under this provision, a Member or staff person must be satisfied that the benefit was neither offered nor enhanced because of his or her official position. The provision also requires that the benefit be one that is "customarily provided to others in similar circumstances."

Example 1. A Member serves, on an uncompensated basis, as a member of the board of directors of a non-profit organization. The board holds monthly dinner meetings, and the organization also provides each director with a free subscription to its monthly publication. The Member may attend the dinner meetings and accept the subscription.

Example 2. The spouse of a staff member is a partner in a law firm that leases a skybox in a pro football stadium. Each partner may attend games with his or her spouse or a guest. The staff member may attend games with his spouse.

Example 3. A Member who was a star tennis player as a youth is invited to a banquet honoring retired greats. The Member may accept.

Example 4. A pro sports team has established an "honorary board of advisers," which is to be composed largely of government officials from the area, and it has asked the local Member to join. Each member of the honorary board will be given season tickets for the team’s home games. While the Member may join the honorary board if he chooses, he may not accept the season tickets under this provision, because in effect the tickets are being offered because of the Member’s official position.

As a related matter, Members and staff are also allowed to accept benefits (including food, refreshments and travel) "customarily provided by a prospective employer in connection with bona fide employment discussions" (clause 5(a)(3)(G)(ii) of House Rule 26).

Example 5. During the course of employment discussions with a lobbying firm, a staff member is offered use of the firm’s beach condo for a weekend. Unless the firm has a history of making the same offer to comparable prospects in the private sector, the offer is not acceptable under this provision.

 

Personal Hospitality of an Individual

A Member, officer or employee may accept a gift of personal hospitality of an individual, except from a registered lobbyist under the Lobbying Disclosure Act or an agent of a foreign principal registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (clause 5(a)(3)(P) of House Rule 26).46  This provision incorporates the definition of the term "personal hospitality" that is provided in § 109(14) of the Ethics in Government Act:

[H]ospitality extended for a non-business purpose by an individual, not a corporation or organization, at the personal residence of that individual or his family or on property or facilities owned by that individual or his family.

Where the requirements of this provision are satisfied, a Member or staff person may accept, for example, a meal at an individual’s residence, and may also accept lodging. It is not required that the host be present; thus, use of a personally owned vacation home is permissible even if the owner is not present. However, this provision does not allow the acceptance of either meals or entertainment outside the home, or travel expenses. In addition, in order for this provision to apply, the property or facilities must be personally owned. Property or facilities owned by a corporation or a firm may not be used under this provision, even if the corporation or firm is wholly owned by an individual. Likewise, as a general rule, a residence or other property that the individual owner rents out to others or otherwise uses for business purposes may not be used under this provision.

The aspect of the rule requiring that the personal hospitality be for a "non-business purpose" should also be noted. Thus, where an individual invites a Member or staff person to a dinner at the individual’s home for the purpose of discussing pending legislation, the invitation may not be accepted under this provision. Similarly, the provision does not apply where the expenses that an individual incurs in providing personal hospitality are either to be reimbursed by a business, or deducted as business expenses.47 

Example 1. Mr. and Mrs. Z (neither of whom is a registered lobbyist or foreign agent) invite Member A and spouse to spend the weekend with them at their home. Provided that there is no business purpose for the visit, the Member may accept under this provision.

Example 2. A Member receives an invitation from an individual (who is neither a registered lobbyist nor a foreign agent) to spend a week at a vacation home. The Member may accept if (1) the home belongs to the host personally (as opposed to a corporate employer), (2) the costs of the visit will not be reimbursed by an employer or deducted from taxes as a business expense, and (3) there is no business purpose for the visit.

Example 3. An individual (who is neither a registered lobbyist nor a foreign agent) invites a Member to spend the weekend with him at his condominium in Aspen. The individual offers to fly the Member out on his private plane and to pay for his ski rentals and lift tickets. While the Member may accept the weekend lodging, the travel and ski expenses are not acceptable under this provision.

As noted above, Members and staff may not accept personal hospitality from a registered lobbyist or foreign agent under this provision. However, it is possible for the benefits encompassed in the personal hospitality provision – for example, a meal or lodging at a private home – to be accepted from a lobbyist or foreign agent under the personal friendship provision of the gift rule.48  The restrictions on the acceptance of things of value under the personal friendship provision are described above (on pp. *-21), and as is noted there, Members and staff must be especially cautious in relying on the personal friendship provision where the offeror is a registered lobbyist or foreign agent.

Briefly stated, a Member or staff person may accept such hospitality from a lobbyist or foreign agent under the personal friendship provision of the gift rule where the following circumstances are present: (1) all of the requirements of the personal hospitality provision are satisfied, including that the property is individually owned, and that there is no business purpose underlying the offer, (2) in addition, there is a history of reciprocal gift exchange between the offeror and the Member or staff person, and (3) if the value of the hospitality exceeds $250, the advance, written approval of the Standards Committee is obtained. The acceptance, from a registered lobbyist or foreign agent, of hospitality exceeding $260 in value must be reported on Schedule VI of one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement.

 

Contributions to a Legal Expense Fund, and Pro Bono Legal Services

A Member, officer or employee may accept "a contribution or other payment to a legal expense fund established for the benefit of [the official] that is otherwise lawfully made in accordance with the restrictions and disclosure requirements of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct" (clause 5(a)(3)(E) of House Rule 26). However, such a contribution or other payment may not be accepted from a registered lobbyist or an agent of a foreign principal (clause 5(c)(3) of House Rule 26).49 

The Committee issued Legal Expense Fund Regulations in an advisory memorandum dated June 10, 1996, which is reprinted in revised form as one of the appendices to this booklet. Those regulations generally prohibit Members and staff from soliciting or receiving donations to pay legal expenses without the prior written permission of the Committee.50  It should be noted that this prohibition generally applies to in-kind donations – including pro bono legal services – as well as cash donations. However, as detailed below, Members and staff may accept pro bono legal assistance for certain purposes without Committee permission.

Merely because a Member or staff person is incurring or will incur legal expenses does not necessarily mean that the individual may establish a fund to defray those expenses. Under the Committee’s regulations, a fund may be established only where the legal expenses arise in connection with one of the following matters:

The Committee will not grant permission where legal expenses arise in connection with a matter that is primarily personal in nature, such as a matrimonial action.

The rules governing the operation of a Legal Expense Fund include the following. A fund must be established as a trust, administered by a trustee who is entirely independent of the Member or staff person who is the trust’s beneficiary. No contribution may be solicited for or accepted by a fund prior to the Committee’s written approval of the completed trust document and the trustee. Trust funds can be used only to pay legal expenses, or the expenses incurred in soliciting for or administering the trust. Excess funds must be returned to the contributors. A fund may not accept more than $5,000 in a calendar year from any individual or organization, but in accordance with the gift rule, no contribution may be accepted from a registered lobbyist or foreign agent. A fund may not pay for legal services for anyone other than the named beneficiary except with the Committee’s written permission. Written Committee permission is also required for any amendment of the trust document and any change in the trustee.

The regulations also require extensive public disclosure regarding each Legal Expense Fund. After the Committee has approved a trust document, the beneficiary must file a copy of it with the Legislative Resource Center (Room B-106, Cannon House Office Building) for public disclosure. In addition, reports on contributions to and expenditures from a fund must be filed with both the Committee and with the Legislative Resource Center on a quarterly basis. Contributions exceeding $260 in a calendar year from any source (other than a relative of the beneficiary) must also be reported on Schedule VI of the beneficiary’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement (see the section on "Gift Disclosure" below).

As to pro bono legal assistance, a Member, officer or employee may accept such assistance without limit for the following purposes:

However, pro bono legal assistance for any other purposes will be deemed a contribution subject to the restrictions of the regulations.

In certain circumstances, campaign funds may also be used to pay legal expenses. The Federal Election Commission has issued a number of advisory opinions on this matter pursuant to its rules barring personal use of campaign funds (11 C.F.R. Part 113). Both the Standards Committee and the FEC should be consulted before campaign funds are used to pay any legal expenses.

 

"Home State" Products

A Member may accept "[d]onations of products from the district or State that the Member . . . represents that are intended primarily for promotional purposes, such as display or free distribution, and are of minimal value to any single recipient." (clause 5(a)(3)(V) of House Rule 26). Several points to bear in mind regarding this provision are as follows:

 

Honorary Degrees and Nonmonetary Public Service Awards

Honorary degrees are acceptable, as are travel, food, refreshments and entertainment that are provided in connection with the award of an honorary degree (clause 5(a)(3)(K) of House Rule 26). In addition, under the same provision of the gift rule, "bona fide, nonmonetary awards presented in recognition of public service" are acceptable, along with food, refreshments and entertainment provided in connection with the presentation of such awards.

This provision allows only the acceptance of a "bona fide" award. Thus especially where the award is an item having significant monetary value, such as a crystal sculpture, it is important to ensure that the award is indeed a "bona fide" one. Among the important considerations here are the nature of the awarding organization, whether the award is made as part of an established program and has been made on a regular basis, whether in the past non-congressional individuals have been recipients of the award, and whether there are specific, written criteria for the selection of the awardees. If the award is an item that exceeds $260 in value, and the recipient is a Member or officer, or an employee who files a Financial Disclosure Statement, the award must be disclosed on Schedule VI of the individual’s filing for the year in which the award was received (see the section on "Gift Disclosure" below).

A public service award that consists of an amount of money is not acceptable under this provision. Similarly, where an award includes both an item and an amount of money, the monetary aspect of the award is not acceptable under this provision. A Member, officer or employee who is offered a public service award that consists of or includes an amount of money may submit a written request for a gift rule waiver to the Committee. In considering any such request, the Committee will closely examine the factors noted above that bear on whether the award is a "bona fide" one.

 

Training in the Interest of the House

Training is acceptable, "if such training is in the interest of the House." (clause 5(a)(3(L) of House Rule 26). Also acceptable under this provision are "food and refreshments furnished to all attendees as an integral part of the training."

This provision may apply to, for example, vendor promotional training, i.e., training provided by a company for the purpose of promoting its products or services. However, the acceptance of training may implicate the prohibition against private subsidy of official activity (clauses 1-3 of House Rule 25), and thus Members and staff should consult with the Committee before accepting training under this provision. This provision does not extend to meals in connection with presentations made by lobbyists or advocacy groups, or to meals in connection with briefings or discussions relating to issues before the Congress.

 

Widely Available Opportunities and Benefits

Members, officers and employees may accept certain opportunities and benefits that are similarly available to individuals outside the House (clause 5(a)(3)(R) of House Rule 26). Specifically, Members and staff may accept opportunities and benefits that are –

  1. "available to the public or to a class consisting of all Federal employees, whether or not restricted on the basis of geographic consideration;"
  2. "offered to members of a group or class in which membership is unrelated to congressional employment;"
  3. "offered to members of an organization such as an employees’ association or congressional credit union, in which membership is related to congressional employment and similar opportunities are available to large segments of the public through organizations of similar size;"
  4. "offered to a group or class that is not defined in a manner that specifically discriminates among Government employees on the basis of branch of Government or type of responsibility, or on a basis that favors those of higher rank or rate of pay;" or
  5. "in the form of reduced membership or other fees for participation in organization activities offered to all Government employees by professional organizations if the only restrictions on membership relate to professional qualifications."

Example 1. A hotel chain offers a discounted rate to all Federal employees, regardless of whether they are on official travel. House employees may take advantage of the reduced rate under category no. 1 above.

Example 2. A staff person accumulates sufficient "frequent flyer" miles on personal travel to receive complimentary airfare to Europe. He may accept the award under category no. 2 above because the "frequent flyer" program is available to all travelers.

Example 3. An alumni association offers reduced-price travel and other benefits to its members. A staff member who is a member of the association may, under category no. 2 above, accept from the association any benefits that it makes available to all of its members.

Example 4. A local health club offers reduced membership fees to congressional staff members. Because the offer is not made to Federal employees generally, and because of the limitations set forth in category nos. 1 and 4 above, House staff may not accept the offer under this provision. A House staff member could accept such an offer under category no. 1 above if it were made to all Federal employees in the Washington, D.C. area.

Example 5. An association of tax attorneys holds monthly lunch meetings, and the admission fee charged to Federal tax attorneys is lower than that charged to private sector tax attorneys. A House staff member who is a tax attorney may attend the lunch meetings at the reduced fee under category no. 5 above, provided that the only restrictions on membership in the association relate to professional qualifications.

Loans

Members, officers and employees may accept opportunities and benefits that are "in the form of loans from banks and other financial institutions on terms generally available to the public" (clause 5(a)(3)(R)(v) of House Rule 26). In addition, as reflected in a Committee advisory memorandum of May 23, 1997, a copy of which is reprinted as one of the appendices to this booklet, the Committee has determined that Members and staff may accept a loan from a person other than a financial institution, provided that the loan is on commercially reasonable terms, including requirements for repayment and a reasonable rate of interest. That determination was based on a separate provision of the gift rule, clause 5(a)(3)(A), which allows the acceptance of "[a]nything for which the Member . . . officer, or employee pays the market value."

Whether a loan from a person other than a financial institution is on terms that are "commercially reasonable," and hence acceptable under the Committee’s determination, will depend on a number of facts and circumstances. Thus, before entering into a loan arrangement with a person other than a financial institution, Members and staff should contact the Committee for a review of the proposed terms, and a determination by the Committee on whether the loan is acceptable under the gift rule.

Awards and Prizes

Members, officers and employees may accept "[a]wards or prizes that are given to competitors in contests or events open to the public, including random drawings" (clause 5(a)(3)(J) of House Rule 26). Thus, for example, a Member or employee who purchases a lottery ticket and wins a cash prize may accept the prize.

The Committee has also determined that a Member, officer or employee may accept a prize won in a drawing, raffle or other contest that is not necessarily open to the public – for example, a drawing held at a charity fundraising event – but only if most of the entries in the contest were from individuals other than Members, officers or employees of Congress (and their accompanying spouses or other individuals).

Any prize that exceeds $260 in value will have to be disclosed on Schedule VI of the official’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement (see the section on "Gift Disclosure" below).

 

Gifts from Relatives

A gift from a relative is acceptable (clause 5(a)(3)(C) of House Rule 26). This provision incorporates the definition of the term relative that is provided in the Ethics in Government Act (5 U.S.C. app. 4 §109(16)):

‘relative’ means an individual who is related to the [official] as father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, great aunt, great uncle, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, grandfather, grandmother, grandson, granddaughter, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, or who is the grandfather or grandmother of the spouse of the [official], and shall be deemed to include the fiancé or fiancée of the [official].

Fiancés and fiancées are included in this definition, and thus engagement rings and other gifts exchanged by engaged couples are acceptable under this provision. However, a gift may not be accepted under this provision where a relative of a Member, officer or employee is merely passing along a gift from some other person.

 

Gifts from Other Members, Officers or Employees

Members, officers and employees may accept "[a] gift from another Member . . . officer, or employee of the House or Senate." (clause 5(a)(3)(F) of House Rule 26). However, Federal law generally bars Government employees from giving gifts to their official superiors.51  While the Committee has recognized common-sense exceptions for voluntary gifts on special occasions,52  as a general rule, Members may not accept things of value from their staff members, and higher level staff members may not accept things of value from those who work for them. In addition, a gift may not be accepted under this provision where a Member, officer or employee is merely passing along a gift from some other person.

 

Things for which a Gift Rule Waiver Is Granted

A Member, officer or employee may accept "[a]nything for which, in an unusual case, a waiver is granted by the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct." (clause 5(a)(3)(T) of House Rule 26).

General Waivers for Wedding and Baby Gifts. Upon receipt of an advance, written request, the Committee will grant a Member, officer or employee a general waiver for gifts received in connection with his or her wedding, or in connection with the birth of a baby. Such general waivers are issued primarily for the convenience of the requester, and notwithstanding the issuance of the waiver, recipients should exercise caution in accepting any gift that likely would not have been offered but for the individual’s official position. As to any such gift, the individual should consider its source, nature and value, and any possible conflict with official duties.

A Member, officer or employee who receives wedding or baby gifts that otherwise are not acceptable under the gift rule, but did not submit an advance request for a general waiver, may submit a waiver request for those gifts. However, such post-event requests should include, at a minimum, a description of each gift for which a waiver is requested, including its market value, and the identity of the donor.

The grant of a gift rule waiver by the Committee does not waive the requirement for reporting certain gifts on Schedule VI of one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement. The requirement for disclosure of certain gifts, and the Committee’s authority to waive disclosure in certain instances, are noted below in the section on "Gift Disclosure." Generally the Committee will waive the requirement for disclosure of wedding and baby gifts, but a separate letter requesting the disclosure waiver must be submitted to the Committee. In contrast to requests for gift rule waivers, which are kept confidential by the Committee, a request for waiver of the disclosure requirement is by law required to be made publicly available.

Other Waivers. In addition to gifts received in connection with a wedding or the birth of a baby, the Committee will also grant gift rule waivers in other "unusual case[s]," provided that "there is no potential conflict of interest or appearance of impropriety."53  For example, where a Member or a family member becomes seriously ill, the Committee will generally grant a gift rule waiver for any flowers or floral arrangements that are received.

Any Member, officer or employee who is offered a gift that is not otherwise acceptable under the rule, but who believes that acceptance of the gift should be allowed, should submit a written request to the Committee for a waiver. Any request should include, at a minimum, a description of the gift, including its market value, the identity of the donor, and a statement of the reasons believed to justify its acceptance.

Other Acceptable Gifts

Under the gift rule, Members, officers and employees may also accept the following gifts:

 

EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED GIFTS

Certain Gifts from Lobbyists

As noted above (in the section "Overview of the Gift Rule"), a Member, officer or employee may not accept any gift, except as the rule specifically provides. Thus, unless a gift falls into one of the categories of acceptable gifts described above, it may not be accepted. In addition, the rule expressly prohibits the acceptance of certain gifts from registered lobbyists and foreign agents. The gifts that are expressly prohibited are as follows:

The prohibition against accepting a contribution or other payment to a legal expense fund from a registered lobbyist or foreign agent was noted above (in the section "Contributions to a Legal Expense Fund, and Pro Bono Legal Services"). Registered lobbyists and foreign agents are also singled out in the gift rule provisions on personal hospitality of an individual (discussed above) and officially related travel (discussed in the travel chapter). The rationale for these special restrictions on gifts from lobbyists is noted above (on p. 6).

 

Definition of Registered Lobbyist

The gift rule provides that the term "registered lobbyist" means "a lobbyist registered under the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act or any successor statute," and the term "agent of a foreign principal" means "an agent registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act." (clause 5(e) of House Rule 26).

With regard to registered lobbyists, the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104-65) is a successor statute to the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act. The Lobbying Disclosure Act in turn defines the term "lobbyist" to mean "any individual" who engages in certain activities. 2 U.S.C. § 1602(10). Accordingly, the Committee interprets the prohibitions on registered lobbyists that are set forth in the gift rule to apply to the individuals who are registered as lobbyists under that Act, as well as to lobbying firms. But the prohibitions do not apply to the clients of lobbyists and lobbying firms (unless the client is also a lobbyist or is a lobbying firm).

HANDLING UNACCEPTABLE GIFTS

When a Member, officer or employee receives a gift that is not acceptable under the gift rule, and for which a gift rule waiver is not available, he or she generally has two options: pay the donor the "market value" of the gift, or return the gift to the donor. However, where the unacceptable gift is a perishable item, such as flowers or a fruit basket, the rule also provides the options of donating the item to charity or destroying it. In addition, other options may be available for a gift that is unusual in nature, such as a work of art from one’s home state. These options are detailed below.

At times when a Member, officer or employee is unexpectedly presented with a gift at an event, he or she may be uncertain whether it can be accepted under the gift rule. In that circumstance, the individual may receive the gift and wait until after the event to review the provisions of the gift rule and make a decision on the gift’s acceptability. Members and staff should always feel free to contact the Committee’s Office of Advice and Education on such matters.

Pay Market Value for the Gift

In general. The gift rule provides that a Member, officer or employee may accept "[a]nything for which the [official] pays the market value" (clause 5(a)(3)(A) of House Rule 26). Generally, for the purpose of the gift rule, items are valued at their retail, rather than wholesale prices. Often an item may be priced differently at different stores. A gift may be valued at the lowest price at which the item is available to the general public. Committee guidance on the value of certain specific kinds of gifts is as follows.

Tickets to Sporting Events and Shows. Except for tickets for seats in a "skybox" or other private luxury box, tickets to sporting events and shows are generally valued at their face price. This general rule on use of the face price applies even to hard-to-obtain tickets that may sell for more than face value on secondary markets. While recognizing that this approach has shortcomings, the U.S. Office of Government Ethics has also adopted it for Executive Branch personnel, because it enables personnel to readily determine the amount they must pay, and avoids "plac[ing] the Government in the position of sanctioning price scalping."54 

However, as to tickets for skyboxes and other private luxury boxes, the Committee has determined that as a general rule, the value is the price of the highest individually priced ticket for the event. Members and staff must pay that amount for a ticket to a skybox, even if the ticket has some lower dollar amount printed on it. In addition to skyboxes, there are certain other kinds of luxury seats at stadiums and arenas, which are at time referred to as "club seats."55  The Committee should be contacted for advice on the value of tickets for those seats. In addition to the value of the ticket(s) accepted, Members and staff must pay the market value of any other benefits that are accepted in connection with the event, including food, beverages, or parking.

Tickets to Charity or Political Fundraisers. Under a policy established by the House Select Committee on Ethics, a ticket to a charity or political fundraising dinner is valued at the cost of the dinner, rather than the cost of the ticket to the purchaser.56 

Honorary Memberships. Membership in a club or other organization typically involves an initiation fee, periodic dues and usage charges. An "honorary" membership usually involves a waiver or reduction in the normal fee or dues levied on members. For purposes of the gift rule, an honorary membership is valued at the total market price of the organization’s normal initiation fee, periodic dues, and/or usage charges. The value of an honorary membership to a Member or staff person is not diminished merely because he or she does not use the membership, or because the honorary membership does not carry voting rights or an equity interest.

Example 1. A Member is offered a complimentary membership in a health club. Normally, new members are assessed an initiation fee of $45 and annual dues of $500. The Member may not accept the membership.

 

Prompt Return to the Donor

The restrictions of the gift rule do not apply to anything that a Member, officer or employee "does not use and promptly returns to the donor." (clause 5(a)(3)(A) of House Rule 26). As noted above, the rule provides additional options only with regard to perishable items: "When it is not practicable to return a tangible item because it is perishable, the item may, at the discretion of the recipient, be given to an appropriate charity or destroyed." (clause 5(a)(6)). Thus a perishable item may be donated to a local hospital, homeless shelter, religious organization, or other charity.

However, where a Member, officer or employee receives a non-perishable gift that cannot be accepted under the gift rule, he or she has no choice but to return the item to the donor promptly. One wishing to return a gift by mail should consult with the Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards (the Franking Commission) to determine if the item is frankable. If the item is not frankable, it will be necessary to purchase postage stamps in order to return it by mail.

Artwork and Other Gifts of an Unusual Nature

At times a Member has been offered, for display in his or her office, a work of art having significant value. Members have also been offered gifts of an unusual nature, the value of which is not readily ascertainable. Gifts in this category have ranged from works of art and antiques to items emblematic of the donor’s cultural group. The gift may represent the personal efforts of an individual, or may symbolize the esteem of a constituent group, and thus a Member may feel awkward about declining such a gift.

A Member may accept a loan of a painting or other work of art from his or her home state for the purpose of displaying the item in the Member’s House office. It should be clearly established in correspondence between the Member and the item’s owner that the Member is holding the item on a loan basis only, and that the item will be returned to the owner upon the sooner of the item being removed from display, the Member leaving office, or the owner requesting its return. In addition, a written statement of the value of the item should be obtained from the owner, and if possible, it would be advisable to place a sticker or other marking on the item that states that the item is on loan and identifies the owner. Finally, the Member should enter into a written agreement with the owner that provides for liability in the event of damage or loss, since official allowances may not be used to repair or replace personal property. On the latter point, staff of the Committee on House Administration should be contacted.

In addition, in certain circumstances, the Standards Committee may consent to a Member receiving a gift of a work of art or similar item for the sole purpose of facilitating its donation to, for example, a museum in the home district or the House Fine Arts Board.57  Provided that the recipient agrees, such an item may be loaned back to the Member, on a temporary basis, for display in the Member’s office. Any Member having a question about the proper manner to handle a gift of this nature should contact the Standards Committee for advice.

 

EVENTS IN HONOR OF A MEMBER, OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE

At times an outside organization wishes to hold a reception or other event in honor of a Member, officer or employee. As long as the identity of the sponsor (that is, the person that is organizing and paying for the event) is made clear to all participants (e.g., on the invitations), an event nominally "in honor of" a Member or group of Members is not generally considered a gift to the honoree(s). Food and beverages enjoyed at these functions are instead considered to benefit all those attending. However, the Members being recognized should not identify themselves as hosts or receive any particular advantage from the event. If they do, the entire cost of the event may be viewed as a gift to the honoree(s).

Thus, for example, a Member with a strong record on environmental issues might be honored at a reception hosted by a lobbying group interested in those issues without raising concerns under the gift rule. If the same Member were an amateur photographer, however, and the event was set up to provide the Member with a forum for selling his or her photographs of wildlife, the Committee could find that the entire cost of the reception was a gift from the organization to the Member. The Committee could also make such a finding if the honoree assumes any role in organizing the event. Put another way, the event must genuinely be the event of the outside sponsor, and it is the sponsor who must determine the nature of the event and the guest list.

BRIBERY AND ILLEGAL GRATUITIES

Where the solicitation or acceptance of a gift is tied to an official act, the U.S. Criminal Code comes into play. The Federal bribery statute makes it a crime for a public official, including a Member, officer or employee of the House, to ask for or receive gifts, money, or other things of value in connection with the performance of official duties. Bribery occurs when a Federal official "directly, or indirectly, corruptly" receives or asks for "anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for .  .  . being influenced in the performance of any official act."58  An illegal gratuity results when an official directly or indirectly seeks or receives personally anything of value other than "as provided by law .  .  . for or because of any official act performed or to be performed."59  In a recent decision the United States Supreme Court discussed the distinguishing features of the two sections:

[F]or bribery there must be a quid pro quo – a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act. An illegal gratuity, on the other hand, may constitute merely a reward for some future act that the public official will take (and may already have determined to take), or for a past act that he has already taken.60 

In that decision, the Supreme Court held that in order to establish a violation of the illegal gratuity statute, "the Government must prove a link between a thing of value and a specific ‘official act’ for or because of which it was given."61  According to that decision, the illegal gratuity statute is not violated in the absence of such a link, such as where one gives a Federal official a gift "because of his official position – perhaps, for example, to build a reservoir of goodwill that might ultimately affect one or more of a multitude of unspecified acts, now and in the future."62 

Thus, both the bribery statute and the illegal gratuity statute require as an element of the offense that the thing of value be related in some manner to an official act, that is, the thing of value must be offered or requested either "in return for being influenced in" or "for or because of" an official act. This element – that the thing of value relate to an official act – distinguishes a bribe or illegal gratuity from a mere gift. A gift, as generally defined, is a "voluntary transfer" of property, made "without consideration."63  A bribe induces an official act; an illegal gratuity rewards an official act; a gift has no connection to any official act.

While responsibility for enforcing this statute rests with the Justice Department, in the view of this Committee, these provisions do not extend to token gifts of appreciation or goodwill, intended as courtesy, and consisting of either:

This view as to perishable items is similar to that in regulations of the Executive Branch's Office of Government Ethics.64 

Example 1. A lobbyist offers a Member a substantial campaign contribution if the Member will introduce certain legislation. The lobbyist has violated the bribery law, as will the Member if he accepts.

Example 2. A Member introduces H.R.1776 and manages the bill through passage solely because she believes the legislation will be good for the country. A lobbyist also favors the legislation because it will benefit his clients. The lobbyist sends the Member a clock radio valued at less than $50, with a note saying, "In appreciation for your good work on H.R.1776." The Member must send the clock radio back as it is an illegal gratuity.

Example 3. In mid-December, a trade association sends a small basket of fruit to Member A's office, with a note saying, "Season's Greetings to Member A and staff." Acceptance of the basket is not prohibited by the bribery and illegal gratuity statutes.

Example 4. A caseworker helps B, a constituent with a VA claim. The following week, the caseworker receives a $25 gift certificate for a local restaurant with a note from B saying, "I'll never be able to repay you for what you’ve done for me." The caseworker must return the gift certificate; it is an illegal gratuity.

Example 5. A caseworker helps a constituent with her Social Security claim. In gratitude, the constituent brings a box of home-baked cookies to the office for the caseworker and the rest of the staff. The caseworker may accept the cookies.

Example 6. Member C’s office helps a constituent with a Medicare claim. In gratitude, the constituent embroiders C's name on a small piece of fabric, for C to display in the office. C may accept the embroidery as a token decorative item.

Example 7. A citizens group sends a Member a framed reprint of the Constitution with a note saying, "Thank you for being a responsible voice for good government." Since the gift is not tied to any specific official act, its acceptance is not prohibited by the bribery and illegal gratuity statutes.

A person found guilty of bribery may be fined up to three times the value of the bribe, imprisoned for up to 15 years, and disqualified from holding any Federal office.65  A person found guilty of seeking or receiving an illegal gratuity may be fined and/or imprisoned for up to two years.66  Violation of these laws may also lead to disciplinary action by the House.

In the 1980s, the Committee on Standards conducted a number of investigations into allegations that Members of Congress accepted bribes or illegal gratuities. In one case, the Member was alleged to have received not cash, but free vacation trips from a creditor of a government contractor on whose behalf the Member had intervened with local authorities.67  In the 96th and 97th Congresses, the Committee investigated three Members on charges – arising out of the Department of Justice’s "ABSCAM" probe – that they had accepted money in exchange for promising to aid purportedly wealthy foreigners seeking to immigrate to the United States.68  Also in the 96th Congress, the Committee investigated a Member for allegedly receiving payments, either directly or through an assistant, from a series of individuals over a five-year period, in exchange for agreements to attempt to influence various Government agencies.69  These cases resulted in one expulsion70  and four resignations from Congress.

In addition to the bribery and illegal gratuities statute, several other provisions of the Federal Criminal Code restrain Members, officers and employees from accepting private compensation in matters of Federal concern. Section 203 of Title 18 prohibits House Members and employees from accepting compensation for representing anyone before a Federal department, agency, officer, or court in any particular matter in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. Even if Members and employees are acting properly and within their official capacities, they may not receive compensation, other than their congressional salaries, for acts before a unit of Federal government.71  Nor may an individual solicit or receive anything of value (including campaign contributions) in return for supporting someone for, or using influence to obtain for someone, a Federal job.72  A Member, officer, or employee should, therefore, be wary of accepting any gifts, favors, contributions, or entertainment from persons whom he or she has assisted with job applications or other dealings with the agencies of the Federal Government.

FUNDRAISERS AND TESTIMONIALS

A provision of the House Code of Official Conduct (clause 7 of House Rule 24) requires that Members treat the proceeds of any testimonial dinners or other fundraising events as campaign contributions, subject to all the restrictions on campaign funds.73  Such funds must be disclosed as required by Federal Election Commission regulations74  and used by the Member only for bona fide campaign or political purposes.75  The money may not be treated as unrestricted personal gifts. House rules prohibit the conversion of campaign funds to personal use or official congressional purposes.76 

The House Select Committee on Ethics determined that a direct mail solicitation by a Member or a Member’s spouse constituted a "fund-raising event" for the purposes of Rule 24, clause 7. Proceeds from such a solicitation must be treated as campaign contributions that may not be converted to personal use by the Member. In reaching this decision, the Select Committee noted that a major purpose of revisions to the Code of Official Conduct was to prevent Members from "cashing in" on their official position in the Congress.77  The Select Committee also found that a Member may not accept for unrestricted personal use the proceeds of a fundraiser conducted by a group independent of the Member.78 

GIFT DISCLOSURE

Under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, Members, officers and certain employees must disclose information in annual financial statements. Schedule VI of the statements concerns gifts received by the reporting individual, and in general, the donor, description and value of all gifts aggregating more than $260 from a single source during the year must be disclosed on that schedule.79  Information on certain gifts received by the spouse or dependent of the Member or employee may need to be disclosed as well.80  However, the statute also provides that in an "unusual case," a gift need not be aggregated "if a publicly available request for a waiver is granted."81  A House Member or staff person wishing a waiver of the reporting requirement must submit a written waiver request to the Standards Committee. Additional information on the reporting of gifts on one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement, and the criteria for granting a waiver of the reporting requirement, are provided in the Financial Disclosure Instructions booklet issued by the Standards Committee.

In addition, as noted above (in the section "Gifts from Foreign Governments and International Organizations"), tangible gifts of over minimal value that may be received from foreign governments must be disclosed at the time such gifts are required to be turned over to the United States, that is, within 60 days of receipt.

 

TRAVEL HIGHLIGHTS

A Member, officer or employee may accept necessary expenses from a private source for travel in connection with official duties – including, for example, to give a speech or engage in factfinding – subject to the following restrictions:

A Member, officer or employee may also accept travel of the following types, provided that the requirements of the rules and other applicable laws are satisfied:

However, a Member, officer or employee may not accept travel to a charity event.

As a general rule, travel having an official House purpose (as opposed to merely an officially connected purpose) must be paid for entirely with official House funds.

TRAVEL

At times Members and staff are offered the opportunity to travel at the expense of an outside organization or of another individual.82  Except as the House gift rule (clause 5 of House Rule 26) provides otherwise, such travel expenses are a gift to the recipient Member, officer or employee. Like any other gift, travel expenses are subject to the basic gift prohibitions noted at the outset of the chapter on gifts – including the prohibition against soliciting a gift – and they may be accepted only in accordance with the provisions of the gift rule. Indeed, travel may be among the most attractive and expensive gifts, and thus before accepting travel, a Member, officer or employee should exercise special care to ensure compliance with the gift rule and other applicable law.

Under the current gift rule, there are essentially five types of travel that a Member, officer or employee may accept, subject to certain restrictions and conditions provided in the rule. These types of acceptable travel are defined primarily by reference to the source of the travel expenses, and the purpose of the trip:

Each of these types of travel is addressed separately in this chapter. Almost certainly the type of travel most frequently offered to Members and staff is of the first type noted above – officially connected travel that is paid for by a private source. While the gift rule imposes a number of requirements and restrictions regarding this type of travel, which are detailed below, those relating to disclosure are especially noteworthy. That is, for any such trip, the rule requires prompt and complete public disclosure of, among other things, the entity that paid for the trip, the trip’s purpose and itinerary, and a detailed breakout of the expenses paid. These requirements for disclosure are among the most significant changes made by the gift rule provisions that took effect on January 1, 1996. Previously, such travel was publicly disclosed only in a far more abbreviated manner, and only in the annual Financial Disclosure Statements filed by Members and senior staff.

Among the other matters addressed in this chapter are –

OFFICIALLY CONNECTED TRAVEL PAID FOR BY A PRIVATE SOURCE

Summary of the Rule

As detailed below, under a provision of the gift rule (clause 5(b) of House Rule 26), a Member, officer or employee may accept necessary travel expenses to attend a meeting, speaking engagement, fact-finding trip or similar event in connection with official duties, from a private source (other than a registered lobbyist or agent of a foreign principal) that is directly and immediately associated with the event or location being visited. "Necessary" expenses include reasonable expenses for transportation, food and refreshments, but do not include expenditures for entertainment or recreational activities.

In the case of domestic travel, expenses may be accepted for up to four days without prior written approval from the Standards Committee. In the case of foreign travel, expenses may be accepted for a maximum of seven days (excluding travel days) without the Committee’s prior written approval. A Member, officer or employee may also accept expenses to enable his or her spouse or child to accompany the individual on the trip.

Staff travel must be authorized in advance by the individual’s supervising Member or officer. For each trip taken by a Member, officer or employee, a travel disclosure form must be completed, signed, and filed with the Clerk of the House within 30 days of return. Members and officers, as well as employees who file a Financial Disclosure Statement, must also report all travel expenses from any source having a total value of more than $260 in a calendar year on their annual statements.

Travel taken in accordance with this provision of the gift rule is not deemed a gift that is prohibited by the rule, but instead is deemed "a reimbursement to the House of Representatives" (clause 5(b)(1)(A) of House Rule 26). Elaboration on the requirements and restrictions of this provision of the gift rule follows.

 

Requirement that the Travel Be in Connection with Official Duties

The fundamental requirement of this provision of the gift rule is that the subject matter of the trip be related to the official duties of the participating Member, officer or employee. Among the travel purposes that may be proper under this provision are attendance at a meeting or a speaking engagement, or participation in a factfinding trip (clause 5(b)(1)(A) of House Rule 26).83 

Where a Member, officer or employee proposes to accept travel under this provision, the rule is very specific in requiring that a determination be made that the travel is in connection with the individual’s official duties. As phrased in the rule, the requirement is for a determination that –

the travel is in connection with the duties of the [individual] as an officeholder and would not create the appearance that the [individual] is using public office for private gain. [clauses 5(b)(2)(D), 5(b)(3)(F) of House Rule 26]

The rule provides that with regard to each trip to be taken by a Member or officer under this provision, it is the responsibility of that Member or officer to make this determination. With regard to each trip to be made by a House employee under this provision, it is the responsibility of his or her employing Member or officer to make this determination. As detailed below (in the section on travel disclosure forms and advance authorization for staff travel), the rule also requires that each of these determinations be made in a writing that is signed by the appropriate Member or officer.

Often the Standards Committee is asked to "approve" a particular trip under this provision of the gift rule. However, the Committee is precluded from "approving" any such trip by, among other things, the fact that the rule places on individual Members and officers – and not on this Committee – the burden of making the determination that a particular trip is in connection with official duties and would not create the appearance of using public office for private gain.

Regarding this determination, the rule makes the fairly evident point that, "events, the activities of which are substantially recreational in nature, are not considered to be in connection with the duties of a Member . . . officer, or employee as an officeholder" (clause 5(b)(1)(B) of House Rule 26). Otherwise, Members and officers must make this determination in a reasonable manner. Under long-standing precedent, travel provided by representatives of the maritime industry for the sole purpose of attending a ship-launching,84  and participation in an inaugural flight of airline route,85  do not constitute permissible fact-finding travel under this provision of the rule.

It should also be noted that while expenses for officially connected travel may be accepted under this provision, Members and staff may not accept expenses from a private source for travel the primary purpose of which is to conduct official business. Clauses 1-3 of House Rule 25 prohibit the acceptance of private support – both monetary and in-kind – for official House activities.86  Thus, where the primary purpose of a trip is to conduct official business, such as general oversight activities within a committee’s jurisdiction, the expenses must be paid with official House funds. For further information on the applicability of House Rule 25 to travel, see pp. *-77 and *-94 of this chapter.

 

Requirements for Advance Authorization of Staff Travel, and for Post-Trip Disclosure of Member and Staff Travel

Advance Authorization. A House employee may not accept expenses for officially related travel from a private source unless he or she first receives the written, signed advance authorization of "the Member . . . or officer under whose direct supervision the employee works" (clause 5(b)(1)(A)(i) of House Rule 26). The required contents of these advance authorizations include the name of the trip sponsor, the time, place and purpose of the trip, and as noted above, a determination that the travel is in connection with the duties of the employee as an officeholder (clause 5(b)(2)).

Disclosure. In addition, each time a Member, officer or employee takes such a trip, he or she must disclose "the expenses reimbursed or to be reimbursed" to the Clerk of the House "within 30 days after the travel is completed." (clause 5(b)(1)(A)(ii)). The required contents of the travel disclosures include the following: good faith estimates of the transportation, lodging, meal and other expenses paid, set out separately, and a determination that such expenses were "necessary" as defined in the rule (clause 5(b)(3)). In addition, the travel disclosures for Members and officers must also include a determination that the travel was in connection with the individual’s official duties.

Members and officers, as well as employees who file a Financial Disclosure Statement, must also disclose each such trip on Schedule VII of their annual statement.

Forms for Advance Authorization and Disclosure. In implementing the gift rule requirements for advance authorization and disclosure, the Standards Committee has issued three forms: an Advance Authorization of Employee Travel, an Employee Travel Disclosure Form, and a Member/Officer Travel Disclosure Form. These forms are reprinted as appendices to this booklet, and copies are also available at the Committee office. The forms are available as well on the Standards Committee Web site at www.house.gov/ethics, in the "Advisory Memoranda" section.

The Advance Authorization of Employee Travel form must be completed and signed by the employing Member or officer before an employee commences a trip. The completed forms are to be maintained on file in the office of the employing Member, officer or committee. They should not be filed with the Standards Committee, the Clerk’s Office, or anywhere else.

The Member/Officer and the Employee Travel Disclosure Forms must be completed and signed, and filed with the Legislative Resource Center of the Clerk of the House (Room B-106, Cannon House Office Building) within 30 days after the travel is completed. While to a large extent the forms are self-explanatory, there are several points that should be borne in mind in completing the forms:

Where a Member or employee files a form beyond the 30-day period provided by the rule, he or she should also send a letter to the Standards Committee stating the reasons for the late filing. Under the rule, the Clerk of the House is to make the disclosure forms available to the public "as soon as possible after they are received" (clause 5(b)(5)). The Clerk’s office also forwards a copy of each form as filed to the Standards Committee staff for review.

Proper Sources of Expenses for Officially Connected Travel

The Committee has long taken the position that a Member, officer or employee may accept expenses for officially connected travel only from a private source that has a direct and immediate relationship with the event or location being visited.87  Thus the Committee found a violation of the gift rule where a Member accepted travel expenses from an organization that was not the sponsor of his speaking engagements.88 

Example 1. A non-profit organization that is active on defense-related issues is holding a conference in New York City. A defense contractor in a Member’s district learns of the conference and believes the Member’s legislative assistant would benefit by attending. However, the staff member may not accept the contractor’s offer of travel expenses to the event, because the contractor does not have a direct and immediate relationship with the conference.

The rule is concerned with the organization(s) or individual(s) that actually pay for travel. Thus, for example, where a non-profit organization pays for travel with donations that were earmarked, either formally or informally, for the trip, each such donor is deemed a "private source" for the trip and (1) must be publicly disclosed as a trip sponsor on the applicable travel disclosure forms and (2) may itself be required to satisfy the above standards on proper sources of travel expenses.89  Accordingly, it is advisable for a Member or staff person who is invited on a trip to make inquiry on the source of the funds that will be used to pay for the trip. In addition, the concept of the rule is that a private entity that pays for officially connected travel will both organize and conduct the trip, rather than merely pay for a trip that is in fact organized and conducted by someone else.

Furthermore, under the gift rule, a Member, officer or employee may not accept travel expenses from "a registered lobbyist or agent of a foreign principal" (clause 5(b)(1)(A) of House Rule 26). The definition of these terms for purposes of the gift rule is discussed in the chapter on gifts (at pp. *-56). As travel expenses may not be accepted from an individual who is a registered lobbyist, they likewise may not be accepted from a lobbying firm. The prohibition against accepting travel expenses from a registered lobbyist, an agent of a foreign principal, or a lobbying firm applies even where the lobbyist, agent or firm will later be reimbursed for those expenses by a non-lobbyist client.

 

Proper Destinations for Officially Connected Travel Paid by a Private Source

The gift rule provision on officially connected travel paid for by a private source does not allow Members or staff to accept what are essentially local meals, local lodging or local transportation. Thus in order to be within this provision, a trip must have a destination beyond the metropolitan Washington area, or beyond the Member’s district, as the case may be. The Committee has taken the position that as a general matter, the site to be visited at private expense must be at least 35 miles from the U.S. Capitol or, for travel in or near one’s congressional district, at least 35 miles from the district office.

In addition, since official allowances are provided to cover travel expenses of both Members and staff between Washington, D.C. and the congressional district, House Rule 25 (clauses 1-3), which generally prohibits private subsidy of official activity, is also relevant here. Under House Rule 25, a Member or staff person generally may not accept expenses from a private source for a fact-finding trip to or within one’s own district. For the same reason, district office staff cannot accept travel expenses from a private source for the purpose of factfinding in the Washington, D.C. area. However, an exception exists where a Member or employee is traveling as part of a group that includes Members and/or staff representing at least two other congressional districts. In that circumstance, the Committee does not interpret House Rule 25 to require the official to separate from the group to avoid going into his or her own district.

The occasional acceptance of travel expenses to give a speech in one’s own district or in the Washington, D.C. area, or otherwise to participate substantially in an event, does not violate House Rule 25. Elaboration on this point appears below (on pp. *-94).

 

Time Limits

As detailed below, the gift rule provision on officially connected travel paid by a private source both (1) imposes limits on the number of days that may be spent at the expense of the private source, and (2) within those limits, further restricts the length of such trips to the time reasonably necessary to accomplish the trip’s purpose.

Travel Within the Continental United States. A trip taking place within the continental United States cannot exceed four days without the advance written approval of the Standards Committee (clause 5(b)(4)(A) of House Rule 26). The Committee has interpreted the four-day time limit to consist of four 24-hour periods. Thus a Member, officer or employee must commence his or her return trip to Washington or the congressional district no later than 96 hours after he or she began the trip.

Example 1. A corporation invites a Member to participate in a factfinding trip to Maine, in which departure from Washington will occur at 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 1. Under the time limit, the Member must commence her return trip to Washington not later than 96 hours after her departure, i.e., Friday, August 5 at 5:00 p.m. Alternatively, the Member must cease accepting expenses from the corporation after 96 hours have elapsed.

Travel Outside the Continental United States. A trip outside the continental United States – including travel to a foreign country, or to Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or any other U.S. territory or commonwealth – cannot exceed seven days exclusive of travel time, except with the Committee’s advance written approval (clause 5(b)(4)(A) of House Rule 26). The Committee interprets this provision to mean that any days spent in whole or in part in traveling to or from the United States do not count toward the seven-day limit. However, time spent traveling between foreign countries does count toward the limit.

Example 2. An educational foundation invites a staff member to participate in a fact-finding trip to Portugal, England and Italy. The trip departs from Washington on June 1 and arrives in Portugal on June 2. Although some time will be spent in transit from one location in Europe to another, the staff member must commence his return to the United States no later than June 10.

Extending the Time Limits. Although the rule authorizes the Committee to approve requests to extend the four- and seven-day time limits, the Committee grants such requests only in truly extraordinary circumstances. The fact that a particular conference, or a fact-finding trip organized by an outside entity, is scheduled to last longer than four or seven days ordinarily will not suffice as grounds for a waiver. An example of a situation that would warrant a waiver is where the destination is so remote that it receives air service only once every ten days. In this regard, it should be borne in mind that these limitations on trip length were imposed out of concern for "the public perception that such trips often may amount to paid vacations for the Member and his family at the expense of special interest groups."90 

Further Restrictions on the Length of Trips. The four- and seven-day limits described above reflect the maximum period for which a Member, officer or employee may accept expenses from a private source for officially connected travel. A further restriction on trip length results from the fact that under this provision of the gift rule, only "necessary transportation, lodging and related expenses for travel" may be accepted (clause 5(b)(1)(A) of House Rule 26 (emphasis added)). That is, a Member, officer or employee may accept only such expenses as are reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose of the trip, and thus it may not always be proper to accept expenses for the full four- or seven-day period. This is particularly so where the sole purpose of an individual’s travel to an event is to give a speech.

Example 3. A trade association invites a Member to give a speech at its annual meeting in Chicago. The annual meeting is scheduled for December 1 through 4, and the Member’s speech is scheduled for December 3. The Member may travel from Washington to Chicago at the association’s expense on December 2, and after he has completed the speech, he should return to Washington or his district as soon as it is practical to do so.

Extending a Trip at Personal Expense. Provided that the officially connected purpose of the trip remains the primary purpose of the trip, travelers may extend trips at their own expense and on their own time and still accept return transportation.91  Likewise, and subject to the same proviso, a traveler may depart early for the initial location of a trip and take personal days there, at his or her own expense, before the start of the officially connected part of the trip, and still accept outbound transportation from the trip sponsor.92  However, a traveler may not accept additional reimbursements to cover the costs of personal travel.

  Example 4.  A private university invites a staff person to participate in a five-day conference in London. After the conference ends, she wishes to take four vacation days in Europe. The staff person may accept reimbursement from the university for her expenses in London and for the cost of round-trip airfare to and from London. She may then continue her travels at her own expense. If the extension of the trip results in higher airfare for the flights between the U.S. and London than would have been charged had the trip not been extended, the staff person must personally pay the difference.

"Stacking" Trips. A Member, officer or employee may be permitted to travel beyond the four- and seven-day limits if he or she is participating in consecutive but distinct trips, sponsored by different organizations. To qualify for "stacking," the trips and their purposes, the sponsors, and the participants must be truly distinct. Where these circumstances are present, a new four- or seven-day time limit commences with the onset of travel to, or participation in, a separate, subsequent event.

Example 5. A staff person receives an invitation from a corporation to participate in a fact-finding tour of Yellowstone National Park that will depart from Washington on February 1 and return on February 4. The staff person also receives a separate invitation from a non-profit organization to attend a conference in Phoenix from February 4 through 7. The staffer may "stack" these trips since they are separate and distinct.

 

Acceptable Travel Expenses

Briefly stated, under the travel provisions of the gift rule, one may accept reasonable expenses for transportation, lodging and meals from the private sponsor of an officially connected trip, but may not accept recreational activities or entertainment. Specifically, these provisions state that a Member, officer or employee may accept "necessary transportation, lodging and related expenses" (clause 5(b)(1)(A) of House Rule 26). They go on to state that the quoted phrase "is limited to reasonable expenditures for transportation, lodging, conference fees and materials, and food and refreshments" (clause 5(b)(4)(B) (emphasis added)). Such expenditures may include those for a private aircraft that is provided or arranged for by the trip sponsor (see pp. *-97 below).

The travel provisions also state that one may not accept "expenditures for recreational activities," or "entertainment other than that provided to all attendees as an integral part of the event, except for activities or entertainment otherwise permissible under this rule" (clause 5(b)(4)(C)). Because acceptance of a gift of entertainment or recreational activities valued at less than $50 would otherwise be permissible under the gift rule (see pp. *-19 of the gift chapter), a Member, officer or employee may accept such a gift while on travel, consistent with the annual gift limit of less than $100 from any source and if otherwise appropriate. On any trip, only one such gift valued at less than $50 may be accepted from any source.

The expenses for transportation, lodging and meals that are properly paid by a private trip sponsor do not count against the sponsor’s annual gift limit of less than $100. However, all of those travel expenses must be publicly reported on the participant’s travel disclosure form.

A traveler may generally accept expenses to or from Washington, D.C. or another duty station. However, he or she may not accept additional expenses for stopovers that are unrelated to the purpose of the trip.

Example 1.  A Member from the Midwest is invited to give a speech in Boston at the beginning of a District Work Period. She may accept airfare from Washington to Boston and then from Boston back to her district. She may not accept additional airfare to return home by way of Los Angeles, since that is not the normal route.

The traveler may in any event accept only actual expenses. Thus an individual traveling alone may not accept reimbursement covering two round-trip tickets for two consecutive events in the same location. Similarly, an individual may not accept eight days of lodging for giving two speeches in the same domestic city on the same day.

Accompanying Spouse or Child

A Member, officer or employee participating in officially connected travel at private expense may accept expenses from the sponsor to enable his or her spouse or one child to accompany the individual on the trip (clause 5(b)(4)(D) of House Rule 26). This provision does not allow the acceptance of travel expenses for any accompanying individual other than a spouse or child, and thus the rule does not allow any other relative, or a fiancé(e), to accompany a Member, officer or employee on a trip. Further, this provision allows the acceptance of expenses for a spouse or one child only, not a spouse and a child.93  The travel expenses paid for a spouse or child must be reported on travel disclosure forms in the same manner as those paid for the Member, officer or employee.

Example 1. A Member is invited by organization Y to give a speech in Dallas on Saturday. Organization Z issues a totally unrelated invitation to the Member to address its members in Dallas on Sunday. Each group offers to pay expenses for the Member and one family member. The Member may bring only one family member to Dallas at the sponsors’ expense. She may not bring her husband at the expense of organization Y and her child at the expense of organization Z because such an arrangement would violate the spouse-or-child restriction of the gift rule.

Example 2.  A Member is invited to give a speech. The sponsoring organization offers the Member and his wife first-class airfare. The Member would like to bring his two children as well. He may not trade in the two first-class tickets for four coach tickets. Even if the sponsor would pay less for the four coach tickets than for the two first-class tickets, to allow the Member to accept expenses for his wife and children would violate the spirit of the spouse-or-child restriction of the gift rule.

However, it is possible for a staff person to participate in a trip along with his or her employing Member, provided that the entity sponsoring the travel provided an unsolicited invitation to the staff person to participate in the trip, and the Member reasonably determines that the staff person’s participation would be in connection with his or her official duties (see the section above entitled "Requirement that the Travel Be in Connection with Official Duties").

At times a private organization has invited only the spouses of Members to participate in a trip. One’s participation in such a trip, in the capacity as the spouse of a Member, would be deemed a gift to the Member. However, the gift rule does not include a provision that generally permits the acceptance of such "spouse only" travel. Instead, as detailed above, the rule allows the acceptance of expenses for spouse travel only when the spouse is accompanying the Member.

Nevertheless, depending on the circumstances involved – including the purpose and itinerary of the trip, and the expenses proposed to be covered – the Standards Committee may consider granting a gift rule waiver to enable a spouse to participate. For further information on the provision of the gift rule that authorizes the Committee to grant waivers in certain circumstances, see pp. *-54 of the gift chapter. When the Committee has granted a waiver for such spouse travel in the past, it has required that the trip be publicly reported in the same manner that Member travel is reported, i.e., on a Member Travel Disclosure form filed with the Clerk’s office within 30 days of return, and on Schedule VII of the Member’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement.

 

Travel of Members and Staff Leaving Office

Because, as detailed above, travel of the type here discussed must be related to official duties, it is questionable whether, after the sine die adjournment of the House, a Member leaving office or an employee leaving House employment may accept an invitation for a trip that is factfinding in nature. As of that time, the official responsibilities that may justify the acceptance of travel expenses for such a purpose will practically have come to an end. However, this consideration does not limit the ability of such a departing Member or employee to accept travel to enable the individual to participate substantially in an officially related event (for example, to give a speech).

TRAVEL UNRELATED TO OFFICIAL DUTIES PAID FOR BY A PRIVATE SOURCE

Several provisions of the gift rule allow Members and staff to accept travel unrelated to official duties from a private source, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. Of these, the two most important are the provision on benefits resulting from outside business, employment or other activities, and the provision on gifts given on the basis of personal friendship. All of these provisions are explored in detail in the gift chapter of the manual, and only their applicability to travel is discussed here.

 

Travel Resulting from Outside Business, Employment or Other Activities

Subject to two restrictions described below, a Member, officer or employee may accept transportation, lodging, meals and other benefits that result from any of the following activities:

The restrictions on the acceptance of such travel are that (1) the benefits may not have been offered or enhanced because of the official position of the Member or staff person, and (2) the benefits must be ones that are "customarily provided to others in similar circumstances" (clause 5(a)(3)(G)(i) of House Rule 26). These are the sole restrictions that apply to travel taking place under this provision of the gift rule. Travel of this type is not subject to the various specific restrictions, enumerated above, that apply to officially connected travel that is paid by a private source, such as the time limits on travel, the limitation that only a spouse or child may accompany, or the prohibition on recreational activities.

Example 1. A staff person’s son is a Boy Scout. The Boy Scouts of America offer the staff person an all expense paid week-long trip to the Grand Canyon if he will chaperone the scouts. He may accept, provided that the trip was not offered because of the staff person’s official position.

Example 2.  A Member’s wife is a lawyer with a private law firm. Every year the firm invites all of its lawyers and their spouses to a weekend retreat at a resort hotel. This retreat would be offered to the Member’s wife regardless of the identity of her spouse. Both the Member and his wife may accept the invitation.

Example 3.  A staff person’s spouse works as a flight attendant for an airline that offers free travel to all employees and their immediate families to the extent that seats are available. The staff person may accept the free flights.

Example 4. A Member has written a book, and her publisher offers to send her on a book tour around the country. The Member may accept, provided that the tour is comparable in duration and benefits to those that the publisher has provided to similarly situated authors in the private sector.

Example 5. A Member is an uncompensated member of the board of directors of a corporation. The corporation provides transportation, lodging and meals to each of its directors in connection with its monthly board meetings, and in connection with the corporation’s annual meeting, all of which occur in San Francisco. The Member may accept this travel from the corporation.

As a related matter, a Member, officer or employee may also accept transportation, lodging, meals and other benefits "customarily provided by a prospective employer in connection with bona fide employment discussions" (clause 5(a)(3)(G)(ii) of House Rule 26).

Travel resulting from such outside business, employment or other activities should not be reported on the 30-day Travel Disclosure Forms that are filed with the Clerk. Those forms are for the reporting of officially connected travel only. However, as with officially connected travel, travel resulting from outside activities that exceeds $260 in value in a calendar year must be reported on Schedule VII of the annual Financial Disclosure Statements of Members and officers, and of those employees required to file an annual statement.

 

Gift of Travel Given on the Basis of Personal Friendship

Like gifts of other kinds, a gift of travel that is given on the basis of personal friendship may be accepted, unless the Member or staff person has reason to believe that, under the circumstances, the gift was provided because of his or her official position with the House, and not because of the personal friendship (clause 5(a)(3)(D) of House Rule 26). The specifics of the gift rule provision on personal friendship gifts are explored in the gifts chapter of this booklet, in the section entitled "Gifts Given on the Basis of Personal Friendship." Before accepting any gift of travel under this provision, a Member or staff person should review that section carefully.

An important limitation on the acceptance of gifts of travel under this provision should be mentioned here, however. A gift exceeding $250 in value – and any significant travel will almost certainly exceed that amount – may not be accepted on the basis of personal friendship unless the Standards Committee issues a written determination that the personal friendship provision applies. Thus, if the travel will exceed $250 in value, an advance written request for approval must be submitted to the Committee. The Committee keeps any such request, as well as its response, confidential.

Note also, however, that travel accepted on the basis of personal friendship that exceeds $260 in value must be reported on Schedule VI of the annual Financial Disclosure Statement of a Member, officer or filing employee, unless the Committee waives the reporting requirement. The Committee will consider written requests for waiver of the reporting requirement, but the waiver requests are made publicly available. Additional information on reporting of gifts and the standards for granting a waiver is provided in the Financial Disclosure Instructions booklet issued by the Standards Committee.

 

Other Gift Rule Provisions

Three other gift rule provisions under which travel unrelated to official duties may be accepted are as follows.

First, there is the provision that allows the acceptance of certain opportunities and benefits that are similarly available to individuals outside the House (clause 5(a)(3)(R) of House Rule 26). Under this provision, for example, flights obtained through an airline’s frequent flier program, where the miles are accumulated through one’s personal travel, may be accepted. This provision is more fully explained in the chapter of this booklet on gifts, in the section entitled "Widely Available Opportunities and Benefits."

Second, the provision allowing the acceptance of honorary degrees also allows the acceptance of travel associated with the presentation of the degree (clause 5(a)(3)(K) of House Rule 26).

Finally, the rule provides that a Member, officer or employee may accept "[a]nything for which the [official] pays the market value" (clause 5(a)(3)(A) of House Rule 26). Regarding the manner in which a flight on a private aircraft is valued for purposes of the gift rule, see pp. *-100 of this chapter.

TRAVEL PAID FOR BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, OR BY STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Under the gift rule, Members, officers and employees may accept travel that is "paid for by the Federal Government, [or] by a State or local government" (clause 5(a)(3)(O) of House Rule 26). This provision is fully explained in the chapter of this booklet on gifts, in the section entitled, "Things Paid for by the Federal Government, or by a State or Local Government." The gift rule includes no restrictions on the ability of Members and staff to accept travel offered by such a governmental entity, whether in terms of trip duration, accompanying individuals, or otherwise. Such travel does not have to be disclosed on either the 30-day Travel Disclosure Forms that are filed with the Clerk or on one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement. The matter of travel paid for or authorized by the House is further addressed below.

TRAVEL PAID FOR BY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT

The basic laws and rules on gifts from foreign governments are summarized in the gifts chapter of this booklet, in the section entitled "Gifts from Foreign Governments and International Organizations." As is detailed there, the Constitution prohibits Government officials from accepting any gift from a foreign government without the consent of Congress, and Congress has consented to the acceptance of certain gifts from foreign governments – including travel in limited circumstances – in two enactments: the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act (FGDA)94  and the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act (MECEA).95  The texts of both of these statutes are set out in the appendices to this booklet.

A Member, officer, or employee may accept travel expenses from a unit of foreign government only under one of these two statutory grants of authority. An official may also accept expenses for foreign travel from private organizations, unaffiliated with any government, subject to the gift rule limitations described above. Travel authorized under MECEA is not subject to the time limits that apply to officially connected travel that is paid for by a private source. However, where FGDA travel is taken in connection with a trip that is otherwise paid for with private funds, the trip is subject to the seven-day limit.

Travel expenses from a foreign government under FGDA. Under the FGDA, any travel paid for by a foreign government must take place totally outside of the United States, must be consistent with the interests of the United States, and must be permitted under FGDA regulations issued by the Standards Committee.96  The intent of this provision, as noted in the Committee’s regulations (§6(e)), is to allow an individual who is already overseas (as on a CODEL) to take advantage of fact-finding opportunities offered by the host country. Therefore, under the FGDA, the Member or employee may not accept expenses for transportation from the United States to the foreign destination or back home again. This rule may not be circumvented by having a foreign government pay for transportation to or from a point just outside the United States border.

The regulations issued by the Standards Committee under the FGDA state that any travel paid for by a foreign government must relate "directly to the official duties of the Member, officer, or employee."97  The regulations also allow the acceptance of travel expenses by an accompanying spouse or dependent. Travel or expenses "may not be accepted merely for the personal benefit, pleasure, enjoyment or financial enrichment of the individual or individuals involved."98  The FGDA and the Committee’s implementing regulations also cover gifts from "quasi-governmental" organizations closely affiliated with, or funded by, a foreign government, as well as any international or multinational organizations with membership composed of foreign governments.

A gift of travel permitted under the FGDA and accepted by a Member or employee must be disclosed within 30 days after leaving the host country.99  The Committee provides a special form for this purpose. The form is reprinted in the appendices to this booklet, and copies are available from the Committee office or its Web site. Under the Committee’s foreign gifts regulations, the disclosure forms filed by Members and staff are publicly available at the Committee office, and their contents are published in the Federal Register on an annual basis.100  Such travel need not be reported on the annual Financial Disclosure Statement of a Member, officer or employee.

Travel expenses from a foreign government under MECEA. MECEA authorizes the Director of the United States Information Agency to approve cultural exchange programs that finance "visits and interchanges between the United States and other countries of leaders, experts in fields of specialized knowledge or skill, and other influential or distinguished persons .  .  .  ."101  The Committee understands that USIA approval of a MECEA program will be reflected in a letter sent by USIA to a representative of the foreign government or another entity, and that USIA maintains a list of the approved programs.

Members and employees of the House may accept travel expenses from a foreign government in order to participate in an approved MECEA program.102  Expenses for MECEA trips are not considered gifts, either for the purposes of the House gift rule or the FGDA. Under MECEA, however, the traveling Member or employee may not accept travel expenses for a spouse or family member.103  All travel expenses in a MECEA trip are to be paid by the sponsoring foreign government, and none of the trip expenses may be paid by any private source.

It is the responsibility of a Member, officer or employee who accepts an invitation to travel to a foreign country to confirm that the expenses for travel to and from the United States are not paid for by a foreign government, unless the trip is consistent with a program approved by USIA under MECEA. Accordingly, where one is invited on a trip that the sponsoring organization describes as permissible under a MECEA program, it is advisable for the invitee to ask the sponsoring organization for a copy of the letter from USIA approving the program. In addition, the Committee understands that USIA will, upon request, review specific trips and determine whether a trip is consistent with an established MECEA program. Such a determination can be requested by either the sponsoring organization or an invitee, and obtaining such a determination from USIA is the best way to ensure compliance with the statute.

A MECEA trip should not be reported on a Member/Officer or Employee Travel Disclosure Form (those forms are filed for privately funded travel only), or on an FGDA form. However, Members, officers, and employees who are required to file an annual Financial Disclosure Statement must report any MECEA trip in which they participated on Schedule VII of that form. The foreign governmental entity that paid for the travel should be identified as the "source" of the travel in Schedule VII.

Example 1.  The Chinese Agricultural Ministry invites the Members of the Agriculture Committee on a ten-day tour of Chinese farm cooperatives. The tour is not part of an approved cultural exchange program. The Members may, consistent with the FGDA, accept expenses for themselves and their spouses while they are in China, but they may not accept airfare to and from China from the Chinese government. They must disclose the receipt of these expenses for themselves and their spouses on an FGDA disclosure form within 30 days of leaving China. They need not report the trip on their annual Financial Disclosure statements.

Example 2. A public university in China invites a Member to attend a two-week seminar and discussion series with Chinese leaders at the school. This trip is pursuant to a program that has been approved by USIA under MECEA. The Member may accept expenses for travel to and from China and related expenses for her two-week stay. If she wishes to bring her husband, she must do so at personal expense. She must disclose the trip on Schedule VII of her annual Financial Disclosure form.

TRAVEL PAID FOR BY A POLITICAL ORGANIZATION

Under the gift rule, a Member, officer or employee may accept transportation, lodging and other benefits provided by a political organization in connection with a fundraising or campaign event sponsored by that organization (clause 5(a)(3)(G)(iii) of House Rule 26). The term "political organization" is defined in this provision by reference to § 527(e) of the Internal Revenue Code104 .

In addition, a Member may travel at the expense of his or her campaign committee when the primary purpose of the travel is campaign or political in nature. For further information on the proper use of campaign funds, see pp. 270-79 of the House Ethics Manual, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. (1992), and the Standards Committee’s advisory memorandum on campaign activity of March 2, 2000. Arrangements for travel to be paid for by a political organization (for example, the booking of flights or hotel reservations) should not be made in a congressional office, and any staff persons traveling on political funds must do so on their own time. Further information on these points is available in the Committee’s advisory memorandum of March 2, 2000.

Travel paid for by a political organization should not be reported on the 30-day Travel Disclosure Forms that are filed with the Clerk, as those forms are for the reporting of officially connected travel only. Travel paid for by a political organization must be reported on one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement only if that travel is not required to be reported on an expenditure report filed with the Federal Election Commission. Accordingly, travel paid for by, for example, a congressional campaign committee generally will not have to be reported on one’s Financial Disclosure Statement. However, travel paid for by, for example, a state or local political organization will have to be reported on Schedule VII of that form.

 

OFFICIAL TRAVEL

The term "official travel" refers to travel paid for or authorized by the House. Official travel includes travel paid for out of the Members’ Representational Allowance or with committee funds, as well as the travel of Members or staff abroad as part of a CODEL or a STAFFDEL.

The basic rules and regulations governing official travel paid for with funds from the Members’ Representational Allowance, or with committee funds, are established by the House Administration Committee. Those rules are set forth in two publications of that committee – the Members’ Congressional Handbook, and the Committees’ Congressional Handbook. Guidance on those rules should be sought from the House Administration Committee.

Official travel to a foreign country may be authorized by the Speaker under clause 10 of House Rule 1, or by a committee chair. Such travel is subject to the requirements set forth in 22 U.S.C. § 1754, as well as clause 8 of House Rule 10 (on funding of foreign travel), and clause 10 of House Rule 25 (prohibiting such travel by a Member not elected to a succeeding Congress after the general election or sine die adjournment).

Travel that is paid for or authorized by the House should not be reported on the 30-day Travel Disclosure Forms that are filed with the Clerk, or on one’s annual Financial Disclosure Statement.

 

Applicability of the Prohibition Against Private Subsidy of Official Activity

In General. As noted above, clauses 1-3 of House Rule 25 prohibit the acceptance of private support – both monetary and in-kind – for official House activities.105  Accordingly, as a general rule, travel the primary purpose of which is to conduct official business must be paid for or authorized by the House. Put another way, Members and staff may not accept expenses or in-kind support from a private source for such travel.

Travel Between Washington and One’s Own District. As was also noted above (on pp. *-77), the Standards Committee interprets House Rule 25 generally to preclude the acceptance of expenses from a private source for a factfinding trip to or within one’s own district. However, the Committee does not view the occasional acceptance of travel expenses to give a speech in one’s own district, or otherwise to participate substantially in an event, to violate House Rule 25. But if, for example, a Member were giving speeches at private expense in the home district every week, concerns would arise under the rule. In that circumstance, the Member would be having private sources pay for a substantial amount of the Member's travel to and from the district – travel that must, as a general rule, be paid with official House funds. In the 99th Congress, the Standards Committee found that a Member violated this rule when he accepted free flights on corporate aircraft for official travel.106  The Member subsequently reimbursed the corporation.

General Requirement that All Expenses of an Official Trip Be Paid with Official Funds. Pursuant to House Rule 25, a private source generally may not pay any portion of the expenses of a trip having an official purpose.

Example 1. A committee chairman has decided to fund Member travel to a conference with committee funds. The sponsor of the conference offers to provide lodging and meals for the Members without charge. The sponsor’s offer may not be accepted. Because official funds are to be used to pay for the airfare, the trip is deemed an official activity. Thus, acceptance of the sponsor’s offer would violate the prohibition against private subsidy of official activities.

Example 2. A Member plans to travel to a conference using MRA funds. The sponsor of the conference invites a staff person of that Member to travel to the event at the sponsor’s expense. The staff person may not travel to the conference at the expense of the sponsor. Because the Member will be traveling on official funds, the participation of that office in the conference is an official activity, and the staff person could travel to it at official expense only.

However, as a general matter, a Member or staff person would not violate House Rule 25 by accepting, while on official travel, food or refreshments that he or she may otherwise accept under the gift rule, for example:

The various provisions of the gift rule that allow the acceptance of these items of food or refreshments are detailed in the gift chapter.

In addition, as detailed in the gift chapter (on pp. *-33), the Committee has determined that a Member or staff person does not violate House Rule 25 by accepting, while on official travel, certain incidental, privately provided transportation. Specifically, a Member or staff person may accept local transportation, outside the District of Columbia, provided by the management of a site being visited in the course of official duties, between the airport or other terminus and the site.

However, privately sponsored travel that is greater than incidental – i.e., travel from one city or one country to another (including meals) – is subject to a different rule. While on official travel, a Member or staff person may accept such privately sponsored travel only if it has a purpose that is entirely different from that of the official travel.

Example 3. A CODEL is in Germany examining the state of aircraft technology in Europe. A privately owned aircraft manufacturer in France learns of the CODEL and offers to fly the delegation to view its facilities. The manufacturer’s offer may not be accepted.

Example 4. The same CODEL referred to in Example 3 receives an offer from a shipbuilding company in France to view its facilities. Because this side trip would have a purpose entirely distinct from that of the official travel, the Members may accept the offer, subject to the ordinary restrictions on privately funded factfinding (as summarized on pp. *-71 above)

 

Use of the Government Rate

The Standards Committee understands that under the contracts with the airlines, hotels and car rental companies that establish the "Government rate", that rate is available only for official travel. Accordingly, as a general matter, the Government rate can be used only when the travel of a Member, officer or employee is to be paid for with official funds, and is not available when the travel is to be paid for with, for example, the funds of a private organization or campaign funds. Furthermore, as a general matter, a House office may not use the Government rate for the travel of anyone other than a Member, officer or employee. Thus the rate is not available for the travel of, for example, the spouse or a child of one of those officials. Information on use of the Government rate is also available from the staff of the House Administration Committee.

 

Use of Frequent Flier Miles Earned Through Official Travel

The rule on the use of frequent flier miles and similar benefits earned through official travel was established by the House Administration Committee and is set forth in the Members’ Congressional Handbook and the Committees’ Congressional Handbook. The rule is as follows:

Free travel, mileage, discounts, upgrades, coupons, etc. accrued by Members or employees as a result of official travel awarded at the sole discretion of the company as a promotional award, may be used at the discretion of the [recipient Member(s) or employees]. The Committee on House Administration encourages the official use of these travel awards wherever practicable.

Information on use of frequent flier miles earned through official travel is available from the House Administration Committee staff.

MIXED PURPOSE TRIPS

For the most part, the preceding sections of this chapter treat all trips as having a single purpose, i.e., an officially connected purpose, a personal purpose, a political purpose, or an official purpose. However, insofar as the Standards Committee is concerned, it is possible for a trip to have more than one such purpose.

As to any such mixed purpose trip, the Member, officer or employee must determine what the primary purpose of the trip will be. The source associated with that primary purpose – for example, a political committee for campaign or political activity, the Government for official business, or the traveler’s own funds for personal business – must pay for the airfare (or other long-distance transportation expense), and all other travel expenses incurred in accomplishing that purpose. Any additional meal, lodging or other travel expenses that the Member or staff person incurs in serving a secondary purpose must be paid by the source associated with that secondary purpose.

The determination of the primary purpose of a trip must be made in a reasonable manner, and one relevant factor in making that determination is the number of days to be devoted to each purpose. That is, often the primary purpose of a trip is the one to which the greater or greatest number of days is devoted.

However, any mixed purpose trip that would be paid in part with campaign funds or House funds must also comply with, respectively, Federal Election Commission rules or rules of the House Administration Committee. The Standards Committee understands, for example, that FEC rules severely limit the ability of Members to, for example, attend a campaign fundraiser while in the course of officially connected travel paid for by a private source. Thus Members and staff should consult the House Administration Committee and/or the FEC, as appropriate, when planning a mixed purpose trip.

TRAVEL TO A CHARITY EVENT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED

The gift rule provision on charity events, which took effect on January 1, 1996, allows the acceptance of a sponsor’s offer of free attendance at a charity event (such as a charity golf tournament), but explicitly prohibits the acceptance of travel to the event. (Note that this marked a major change in the provision in effect through 1995, under which Members, officers and employees could accept travel to participate in such charity events; see footnote 83 on p. * of this chapter.) Under the charity event provision now in effect,

A Member . . . officer, or employee of the House, or the spouse or dependent thereof, may accept a sponsor’s unsolicited offer of free attendance at a charity event, except that reimbursement for transportation and lodging may not be accepted in connection with the event. [clause 5(a)(4)(C) of House Rule 26 (emphasis added)]

This provision is explained more fully on pp. 25-27 of the chapter on gifts.

USE OF A PRIVATE AIRCRAFT FOR TRAVEL

At times Members or staff are offered the use of, or wish to use, a private aircraft for travel. Whether it would be permissible to use a private aircraft for a particular trip will depend on a number of circumstances, including the type of travel involved. The major considerations on use of a private aircraft, according to the type of travel, are as follows.

Officially Connected Travel Paid for by a Private Source. In participating in officially connected travel that is paid for by a private source, a Member, officer or employee may accept a flight on a private aircraft that is provided by the sponsor of the trip107 . Thus, for example, where a corporation is the sponsor of a trip, a flight on an aircraft owned or leased by the corporation would be permissible. A flight on a private aircraft that is owned or leased by someone else would also be permissible, provided that the flight was entirely arranged by the trip sponsor. Acceptance of a free flight on a private aircraft for such travel in any other circumstances would be impermissible.

Example 1. An industry association invites a Member to attend its annual dinner in New York. A corporate official in Washington who will be attending the dinner using his corporation’s jet invites the Member to fly with him to the event without charge. The Member may not accept a free flight on the corporate jet.

Where a flight on a private aircraft is provided by the sponsor of a trip, the Member, officer or employee should disclose the value of the flight on his or her travel disclosure form in accordance with the valuation policy set forth below.

Travel Resulting from Outside Business, Employment or Other Activities. In participating in travel resulting from outside business, employment or other activities, a Member, officer or employee may accept a flight on a private aircraft provided by the business or other entity with which the individual is involved, if two conditions are satisfied: (1) the private aircraft was not provided because of the individual’s official position, and (2) such travel is customarily provided to others in similar circumstances.

Travel Provided on the Basis of Personal Friendship. At times a Member, officer or employee is offered a flight on an aircraft that is personally owned by an individual whom the official knows. If the requirements of the personal friendship provision of the gift rule are satisfied, the offer may be accepted. Those requirements are detailed on pp. *-21 of the gift chapter, and p. * of this chapter. Several points to bear in mind regarding this type of travel are as follows:

Travel for which Market Value Is Paid. Under the gift rule, a Member, officer or employee may accept a flight on a private aircraft for which he or she pays the market value. The manner in which such a flight is valued for purposes of the gift rule is set forth below.

However, the Standards Committee understands that individuals, corporations and other entities that own private aircraft rarely have the ability, under their certification from the Federal Aviation Administration, to accept such compensation for the carriage of passengers, except with regard to campaign travel. Thus before accepting a flight that is to be paid for with personal funds (or with official funds), a Member, officer or employee should ensure that the aircraft owner may lawfully accept payment in the prescribed amount.

Travel Paid for by the Federal Government, or by State or Local Government. A flight on a private aircraft that is paid for by the Federal Government, or by a state or local government, may be accepted. Likewise, a flight on an aircraft owned by a governmental entity may be accepted.

Travel Paid for by a Foreign Government. A flight on a private aircraft that is paid for by a foreign government may be accepted, provided that the flight complies with the requirements of either the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act (FGDA) or the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act (MECEA). The requirements of those statutes, including that travel paid for under the FGDA must take place totally outside the United States, are explained above (on pp. *-90).

Travel Paid for by a Political Organization. Rules on the use of corporate or labor organization aircraft for campaign travel are set out in the regulations of the Federal Election Committee at 11 C.F.R. § 114.9(e). Briefly stated, those rules require advance reimbursement of the corporation or union that owns the aircraft at rates set forth in the regulations. However, the use of an aircraft owned by an individual, rather than a corporation or union, for campaign travel is governed by a different set of FEC rules. The FEC should be consulted for guidance on these rules.

Official Travel. The rules issued by the House Administration Committee for both Members and committees include provisions for payment for flights on chartered aircraft and on corporate, business or privately owned aircraft. However, as noted above, the Standards Committee understands that individuals, corporations and other entities that own private aircraft rarely have the ability, under their certification from the Federal Aviation Administration, to accept such payment for the carriage of passengers. Thus before accepting a flight that is to be paid for with official funds, a Member, officer or employee should ensure that the aircraft owner has the ability to accept payment in the amount prescribed by the House Administration rules.

Otherwise, the Standards Committee understands that if an employee of a Member personally owns an airplane, the employee may fly the Member on official business and receive per-mile reimbursement from the Member’s Representational Allowance under rules issued by the House Administration Committee. Questions on this matter should be directed to the House Administration Committee.

Valuation of a Flight on a Private Aircraft. When a Member or staff person uses a private aircraft for either a political or an official purpose, reimbursement must be made at the rates and under the rules prescribed by, respectively, the Federal Election Commission or the House Administration Committee.

Otherwise, for purposes of the gift rule, flights on private aircraft have heretofore been valued according to a policy statement that the Committee issued in 1987. Under that policy, most such flights were valued at the cost of a first-class ticket from the point of departure to the destination. The Committee has revised this policy to accord a higher value – i.e., the cost of a charter – to any flight that was scheduled specifically for the use of the Member, officer or employee. The rules of the House Administration Committee likewise require reimbursement at this higher rate where such a flight is taken for an official purpose. Thus this change brings the Standards Committee policy into harmony with the House Administration Committee rule on this point.

Accordingly, flights on a private aircraft are hereafter to be valued as follows:

When the travel is via a previously or regularly scheduled flight by the owner or operator of the aircraft, and the cities between which the Member or staff person is flying have regularly scheduled air service (regardless of whether such service is direct), then the value of the use of the aircraft is the cost of a first-class ticket from the point of departure to the destination. If only coach rates are provided between those points, the value is the coach rate. If more than one first-class or coach rate is available, the lowest fare will be used. However, no discount fares, such as "supersaver" fares, will be used for valuation purposes.

When the flight is scheduled specifically for Member or staff person use, or when either the point of origin or destination does not have regularly scheduled air service, then the value of the use of the aircraft is the cost of chartering the same or a similar aircraft for that flight.


Footnotes:

 

1Code of Ethics for Government Service ¶ 10, H. Con. Res. 175, 85th Cong., 2d Sess., 72 Stat., pt. 2, B 12 (1958).

2Id. ¶ 5. See also 135 Cong. Rec. H8764 (daily ed. Nov. 16, 1989) (debate on Ethics Reform Act of 1989, quoting Paul Volcker, Chairman of the National Commission on the Public Service); United States v. Podell, 436 F. Supp. 1039, 1042 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), aff'd, 572 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1978).

3See Paul H. Douglas, Ethics in Government 48-49 (1952).

4Special Subcomm. on the Establishment of a Comm’n on Ethics in Gov’t, Senate Comm. on Labor and Public Welfare, Ethical Standards in Government, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. 23 (Comm. Print 1951).

5House Bipartisan Task Force on Ethics, Report on H.R. 3660, 101st Cong., 1st Sess. 6 (Comm. Print, Comm. on Rules 1989), reprinted in 135 Cong. Rec. 30740, 30742 (1989) (hereinafter "Bipartisan Task Force Report").

6yS. Rep. No. 255, 103d Cong., 2d Sess. 3-4 (1994).

75 U.S.C. § 7353(b)(2)(B).

8House Rule 24, cl. 3.

9House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, Investigation of Financial Transactions Participated in and Gifts of Transportation Accepted by Representative Fernand J. St Germain, H. Rep. No. 100-46, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 3, 9, 43 (1987).

10See House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, In the Matter of Representative Charles H. Wilson (of California), H. Rep. No. 96-930, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 4-5, 19-20 (1980). See also In the Matter of Representative Daniel J. Flood, H. Rep. No. 96-856, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 5-15 (1980).

11Bipartisan Task Force Report, supra n. 5, 135 Cong. Rec. 30742.

12Pub. L. No. 101-194, § 801(a), 103 Stat. 1716, 1771 (1989), as amended by Pub. L. No. 102-90, § 314(d), 105 Stat. 447, 469 (1991).

13From January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1991, the gift rule banned the acceptance of gifts worth more than $200 from any one source in any one year, excepting gifts worth $75 or less.

14141 Cong. Rec. H13073-95 (daily ed. Nov. 16, 1995); id. H13844-45 (daily ed. Nov. 30, 1995).

15H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 8 (1995).

16S.885 – To Modify Congressional Restrictions on Gifts: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Oversight of the Senate Comm. On Governmental Affairs, 103d Cong., 1st Sess. 5-6 (statement of Sen. Lautenberg).

17145 Cong. Rec. H208-H211 (daily ed. Jan. 6, 1999).

18For the sake of convenience, the term "Member" as used hereafter in this booklet refers to House Members, the Delegates to the House and the Resident Commissioner.

19See H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 13 (1995).

20However, where a reception will involve only "[f]ood or refreshments of a nominal value offered other than as a part of a meal," Members and staff may participate in it under a separate provision of the gift rule, described below, even if the reception does not satisfy the requirements for a widely attended event.

21The items encompassed in the term "free attendance" as used in the gift rule are described below.

22See H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 12 (1995).

23H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 12 (1995).

24The items encompassed in the term "free attendance" as used in the gift rule are described below.

25H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 12 (1995).

26Id. 12.

27Sound guidance on the possibility of multiple sponsors for an event was provided in a Senate committee report on an earlier version of the gift rule. "[T]here may be more than one sponsor of an event if more than one entity plays a significant, active role in organizing the event in a manner that is roughly comparable to another sponsor or sponsors." S. Rep. No. 255, 103d Cong., 2d Sess. 14 (1994).

28Briefly stated, under that statute, a political organization is an entity organized and operated primarily for the purpose of accepting contributions or making expenditures for the purpose of influencing the election of any individual to a public or political office.

29The Rules Committee report on the gift rule characterizes this provision as allowing the acceptance of "reception food." H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 11 (1995).

30It should be noted that a separate provision of the gift rule, described below, applies to bona fide public service awards presented to Members or staff.

31H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 11 (1995).

32Id.

33Art. I, § 9, cl. 8.

345 U.S.C. § 7342.

3522 U.S.C. § 2458(a).

365 U.S.C. § 7342(a)(2)(B).

375 U.S.C. § 7342(c)(1)(A).

38The Committee’s implementing regulations are issued pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7342(a)(6)(A), (g)(1) and apply to House Members and staff. The regulations were first published on Jan. 23, 1978 (124 Cong. Rec. 452-53) and are reprinted in their current form as an appendix to this booklet.

395 U.S.C. § 7342(a)(5)(A); 64 Fed. Reg. 13700-01 (1999).

40Id. § 7342(c)(1)(B).

41Id. § 7342(c)(2), (a)(6)(A).

42Id. § 7342(c)(3).

43Id. § 7342(g)(2)(B), (a)(6)(A).

44Id. § 7342(f).

45Id. § 7342(c)(1)(B).

46The definitions of the terms "registered lobbyist" and "agent of a foreign principal" as used in the gift rule are noted below in this chapter (on pp. *-56).

47Bipartisan Task Force Report, supra n. 5, 135 Cong. Rec. 30743.

48See H. Rep. No. 337, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 11 (1995).

49The definitions of the terms "registered lobbyist" and "agent of a foreign principal" as used in the gift rule are noted below in this chapter (on pp. *-56).

50The only donations that may be solicited or received without prior permission are donations from relatives, and donations of up to $250 that are given on the basis of personal friendship (as discussed above in this chapter).

515 U.S.C. § 7351.

52For example, a birthday, holiday, marriage, the birth of a child, anniversary, retirement and like occasions when gifts are traditionally given.

53Bipartisan Task Force Report, supra n. 5, 135 Cong. Rec. 30743.

5457 Fed. Reg. 35014 (1992).

55The Standards Committee understands that for the 1999-2000 season, Club Seat tickets for regular season Washington Capitals and Wizards games at the MCI Center in Washington had a face value of $49.50. The Committee determined that this amount could be considered the market value of one of those tickets for purposes of the gift rule. However, (1) a ticket for a skybox in the MCI Center is not valued at that amount, but is instead valued in the manner stated in the text above, and (2) as to Club Seat tickets for any other events at the MCI Center (including any playoff games), the Committee should be contacted for advice on value.

56Final Report of the Select Comm. on Ethics, H. Rep. No. 95-1837, 95th Cong., 2d Sess., at 9.

57The Board has statutory authority to accept, on behalf of the House, gifts of works of fine art, historical objects and similar property.

5818 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2)(A).

59Id. § 201(c)(1)(B).

60United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers, 119 S.Ct. 1402, 1406 (1999).

61Id.1411.

62Id.1406.

63Black’s Law Dictionary 688 (6th ed. 1990).

645 C.F.R. § 2635.205(a)(2) (Example 1).

6518 U.S.C. § 201(b).

66Id. § 201(c).

See 67In the Matter of Representative Mario Biaggi, H. Rep. No. 100-506, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. (1988). The Committee recommended expulsion, but the Member resigned before the House could act.

68See In the Matter of Representative Michael J. Myers, H. Rep. No. 96-1387, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 (1980); In the Matter of Representative John W. Jenrette, Jr., H. Rep. No. 96-1537, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 10 (1980); In the Matter of Representative Raymond F. Lederer, H. Rep. No. 97-110, 97th Cong., 1st Sess. 16 (1981).

69In the Matter of Rep. Daniel J. Flood, H. Rep. No. 96-856, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 125 (1980).

70126 Cong. Rec. 28953-78 (Oct. 2, 1980).

71May v. United States, 175 F.2d 994 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 830 (1949). Indeed, if an employee is acting outside his or her official duties, the employee may not act as anyone’s agent or attorney before any Federal agency or officer in a matter in which the United States has an interest, whether or not compensation is received. 18 U.S.C. § 205(a).

7218 U.S.C. § 211.

73This provision was a recommendation of the House Commission on Administrative Review. See House Comm’n on Admin. Review, Financial Ethics, H. Doc. No. 95-73, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 14 (1977).

74Title 11, C.F.R.

75House Rule 24, cl. 6.

76House Rule 24, cl. 6; House Rule 25, cl. 1-3.

77House Select Comm. on Ethics, Advisory Opinion No. 4 (Apr. 6, 1977), reprinted in H. Rep. No. 95-1837, supra n. 56, app. at 61-62.

78House Select Comm. on Ethics, Advisory Opinion No. 11 (May 11, 1977), reprinted in H. Rep. No. 95-1837, supra n. 56, app. at 76-77.

795 U.S.C. app. 4 § 102(a)(2).

80Id. § 102(e)(1)(C).

81Id. § 102(a)(2)(C).

82In this chapter, the terms "travel" and "travel expenses" are used interchangeably, because the rules are the same whether one accepts "travel" (i.e., transportation, food, lodging or other items provided on an in-kind basis), or "travel expenses" (i.e., cash reimbursement for expenses paid directly by the traveling individual).

83Under the gift rule in effect prior to January 1, 1996, Members and staff could accept travel expenses from private sources in connection with "substantial participation" events or factfinding. See House Select Comm. on Ethics, Advisory Opinion No. 2 (Apr. 6, 1977), and Advisory Opinion No. 8 (May 11, 1977), reprinted in H. Rep. No. 95-1837, supra n. 56, app. at 58-60 and 69-71). It was required that any fact-finding travel be directly related to official duties, but "substantial participation" travel did not have to be related to official duties – for example, travel to participate as a celebrity in a golf tournament was permissible.

 

84Id.

85House Select Comm. on Ethics, Advisory Opinion No. 3 (Apr. 6, 1977), reprinted in H. Rep. No. 95-1837, supra n. 56, 95th Cong., 2d Sess., app. at 60-61.

86Prior to the recodification of the rules that occurred at the beginning of the 106th Congress, these provisions of the rules were numbered as House Rule 45.

87House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, Investigation of Financial Transactions participated in and Gifts of Transportation Accepted by Representative Fernand J. St Germain, H. Rep. No. 100-46, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 5-6 (1987).

88Id.

89The result would be the same where, for example, a major donor to a non-profit organization has a significant role in organizing or conducting a trip to which the non-profit issues invitations.

90Bipartisan Task Force Report, supra n. 5, 135 Cong. Rec. 30742.

91See also the section below (on p. *) entitled "Mixed Purpose Trips."

92In this regard, the rule provides that one may accept necessary transportation, "whether or not such transportation occurs within" the four- and seven-day periods established in the rule (clause 5(b)(4)(B) of House Rule 26).

 

93A Member, officer or employee who wishes to be accompanied on a trip by more than one such individual, or by an individual other than a spouse or child, may personally pay the travel expenses of that individual, or may apply to the Committee for a gift rule waiver. However, the Committee will grant such a waiver only in exceptional circumstances.

945 U.S.C. § 7342.

9522 U.S.C. § 2458(a).

96The regulations are reprinted in their current form as an appendix to this booklet.

97Regulations § 6(e).

98Id.

99Id. §§ 6(e), 7(b); 5 U.S.C. § 7342(c)(3).

100Id. §8.

10122 U.S.C. § 2452(a)(2)(i).

10222 U.S.C. § 2458a(1).

103Id.

104Briefly stated, under that statute, a political organization is an entity organized and operated primarily for the purpose of accepting contributions or making expenditures for the purpose of influencing the election of any individual to a public or political office.

105Prior to the recodification of the rules that occurred at the beginning of the 106th Congress, these provisions of the rules were numbered as House Rule 45.

 

106House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, Investigation of Travel on Corporate Aircraft Taken by Representative Dan Daniel, H. Rep. No. 99-470, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (1986).

107For further information on this point, see also the discussion on pages *-76, regarding the proper source of expenses for officially connected travel.