DURBIN, LIPINSKI SAY PRESIDENT'S EXECUTIVE ORDER DID NOT GO FAR ENOUGH

Thursday, August 24, 2006

[Chicago, IL] – U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) and U.S. Representative Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) today said President Bush’s Executive Order requiring the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and three other agencies to disclose to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries the cost of medical procedures “did not go far enough.” Durbin and Lipinski urged HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt “to exercise the option President Bush has given you and publish these prices in a manner easily accessible to all Americans.”

In a letter to Secretary Leavitt, Durbin and Lipinski wrote: “It is the 46 million Americans without health insurance who most need this information. Not only are uninsured Americans often paying out-of-pocket for their care, they are paying rates far higher than insured Americans because they do not have access to the reduced rates negotiated by insurance companies.”

Durbin and Lipinski noted that the Executive Order failed to address another important issue: the price Medicare is paying for prescription drugs. “Given the investment the federal government is now making in prescription drugs, it is imperative that we receive the best possible price. Without knowing the actual prices that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is paying for pharmaceuticals in Medicare and Medicaid, it is impossible to compare,” they wrote.

Lipinski and Durbin are the chief sponsors of bipartisan legislation requiring hospitals to report the prices of the 25 most frequently performed in-patient and out-patient procedures and the 50 most commonly prescribed drugs. The Hospital Price Reporting and Disclosure Act will provide uninsured Americans with information to protect them against price gouging.

The full text of the letter to Secretary Leavitt is attached.


August 24, 2006

The Honorable Michael Leavitt Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20201

Dear Secretary Leavitt:

As the lead Democratic sponsors of the Hospital Price Disclosure Act, we applaud the President’s Executive Order of August 22, 2006, requiring your agency to make available to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries information regarding the prices paid for medical procedures. However, we are concerned that the Order did not go far enough.

We were disappointed the Order failed to require your agency to make pricing information available to the general public. It is the 46 million Americans without health insurance who most need this information. Not only are uninsured Americans often paying out-of-pocket for their care, they are paying rates far higher than insured Americans because they do not have access to the reduced rates negotiated by insurance companies.

As you know, there is often a great disparity between what different hospitals charge for specific procedures and drugs. When California implemented a price disclosure law, they found that one hospital charged only $120 for a chest x-ray while a neighboring hospital charged more than $1,500. With many American families faced with the prospect of bankruptcy as a result of medical illness, the savings they could achieve by comparing prices is meaningful. We urge you to exercise the option President Bush has given you and publish these prices in a manner easily accessible to all Americans.

We were also disappointed that the Executive Order did not require pharmaceutical price transparency. Given the investment the federal government is now making in prescription drugs, it is imperative that we receive the best possible price. Without knowing the actual prices that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is paying for pharmaceuticals in Medicare and Medicaid, it is impossible to compare.

As you know, your agency only requires plans to report rebates "in the aggregate." Therefore, CMS has no knowledge of the drug-specific rebates the plans are receiving. Why is your agency not requiring this information so we can compare the net price CMS is paying for Lipitor in Medicare against the net price state Medicaid programs are paying for Lipitor? Or, compare prices between the Veterans Administration’s program and the Medicare program? We urge you to implement price transparency in pharmaceutical pricing.

We would appreciate hearing your thoughts on these two important issues.

Sincerely,

Richard J. Durbin

United States Senator

Daniel Lipinski

United States Representative

 

[ Return to Previous Page ]