|
Smith BRAC Presentation Summary |
||
(Washington, DC) —
Ø Joint Base McGuire/Ft. Dix/Lakehurst: “Enthusiastically Welcomed and Embraced” Ø “Save the Fort. Would attach neatly and seamlessly with new Joint Base” Ø DoD’s Plan to “A Patently Absurd Suggestion” “DoD's recommendation to merge Navy Lakehurst with two other contiguous installations, Fort Dix and McGuire Air Force Base - is enthusiastically welcomed and embraced and reflects the concept of jointness some of us have been aggressively pursuing for years,” said Smith who ten years ago led the fight that reversed the BRAC 95 decision to close Lakehurst. He cited concerns over brain drain and erroneous cost savings as reasons for the BRAC reversal. Smith said “with more than $82 million in milcon and warfighter enhancing projects we’ve poured into the base over the last decade, Navy Smith said the joint base will be “an incubator of best joint practices” that will continue to be a hub for military jointness, homeland security efforts and other military and federal tenants. “With your imprimatur, New Jersey's new mega-base is poised to become the first - and only - triservice joint base in the United States…and you can make it even stronger,” he said again lending his support to saving Ft. Monmouth and attaching it to the mega-base. “The next panel will make a compelling case as to why a modestly scaled down, almost contiguous Turning towards the Pentagon’s recommendation to retire two flying squadrons of the 108th Air Refueling Wing from McGuire, Smith called it “a patently absurd suggestion that flies in the face of good management and military value.” “The Smith whose district includes For Homeland Security purposes, the joint mega-base is within 300 miles of 25% of the | ||
### | ||
For Immediate Release: July 8, 2005 Contact: David Kush (202) 225-3765 |
||
| ||