Issue Areas & Legislative AccomplishmentsEconomy & Jobs | Crime | Farm Labor/Immigration | Health Care | Education | Retirement Security | Environment | Transportation | Fighting Government Waste | Homeland Security | Politics | Veterans | Energy Economy & Jobs
Related NewsCrime
Related News
Health CareWe spend more per capita on health services than any other nation in the world, and yet we still have over 40 million uninsured. Responsible families that have always lived within their means are driven into bankruptcy and destitution by the costs of unexpected illnesses. And while extension of health benefits has long been stonewalled on grounds of cost, the costs of not extending universal health care are driving our manufacturers out of business. I believe that Democrats must take the lead on this issue and that a system of universal healthcare is the best solution.
Related Documents
Related NewsDemocratic Medicare Drug Reforms Could Save Seniors Billions of Dollars (10/26/2006) Rep. Berman Fights to Block Doubling and Tripling of Medicare Premiums for Many Seniors (9/29/2006) Protecting America's Seniors from Bush Medicare Prescription Drug Tax (5/4/2006) Rep. Berman Opposes Bill that Undermines Food Safety (3/6/2006)
Education
Related News
Retirement Security
Related NewsEnvironment
Legislative action on these issues
Related NewsRep. Berman Calls for Hearings on Global Warming (9/19/2006)
Transportation
Related News
Foreign Affairs
Citizens for Global Solutions offers voters a detailed assessment of their members' positions on a range of global issues from the genocide in Darfur to international AIDS and development funding. The extra credit is awarded to legislators for outstanding work on behalf of global issues. Rep. Berman was one of thirty-seven Members of Congress recognized by Citizen for Global Solutions with extra credit. CONGRESSMAN HOWARD BERMAN'S POSITION ON THE CURRENT SITUATION IN IRAQ I have grave concerns about the direction of the current involvement in Iraq. The casualties, the on-going violence(inter-communal as well as insurgent), the failure so far to forge a broad-based coalition government, the lagging pace of reconstruction (coupled with massive waste and evidence of corruption), and a presidential leadership characterized by an Alfred E. Neuman-like "what me worry" surrealistic optimism -- all compel a continuing reassessment of our position and our presence. I voted to authorize the war in Iraq for one reason only -- because I was convinced that Saddam had chemical and biological weapons and was seeking a nuclear weapon capability, and that the sanctions regime then in place would not contain him. I can't blame Bush for that. It was my conclusion, based on twenty years of watching Saddam closely, his earlier acquisition of such an arsenal, his behavior (blocking the UN inspection team), a conclusion reaffirmed by numerous top national security and Iraq specialists in the Clinton Administration and in outside think tanks. I was clearly wrong. While I hoped that his removal would lead to a pluralistic, democratic Iraq where human rights and rule of law were respected, and that there would be a positive spillover effect on other countries in the region, and that this would provide an effective counter-force to the spread of radical Islamic regimes and terrorist bases, my vote was not based on this hope. I was never swayed by claims of strong ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda, nor any reckless and cheap efforts to implicate Saddam in 9/11. IF I HAD KNOWN THEN THAT HE DID NOT HAVE WMD, NOR A MEANINGFUL PROGRAM TO OBTAIN NUCLEAR WEAPONS, I WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED TO AUTHORIZE THE WAR. But now we are in Iraq. Al Qaeda is dedicated to defeating us there. The fate and future of millions of Iraqis (Shiites and Sunnis, Kurds and Turkamen, religious and secular) are dependent on stabilizing the situation there. The stability of the rest of the region and the avoidance of a wider conflict are also dependent on that. The irony notwithstanding, Iraq, as a center of radical Islamic terrorism (both because of its location and its resources), represents a national security threat to the United States. I hope we can achieve our goals, and thereby avoid those consequences. In war, mistakes are inevitable - and this administration certainly has made far more than its share. Still, I believe the consequences of a precipitous withdrawal are calamitous. HOWEVER, THE COSTS OF AN ON-GOING AMERICAN PRESENCE IN THE ABSENCE OF SERIOUS PROGRESS TOWARDS A STABLE IRAQI GOVERNMENT THAT CAN DEFEND ITSELF ARE UNTHINKABLE. I will be reassessing my position on Iraq on a regular basis to see if progress that is necessary to justify our on-going presence is forthcoming. Related NewsRep. Berman Urges President Bush to Release Full Report on Terrorism and Iraq (9/28/2006) Rep. Berman Sponsors Resolution Demanding Release of Intelligence Reports on Iraq (9/27/2006) Rep. Berman Opposes Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq (9/19/2006) Berman Introduces Resolution Demanding State Department Documents on Proliferation to Iran (9/7/2006) Rep. Berman Sends Letter to Secretary Rice on Overdue Report Detailing Indian Missile Transfers to Iran (7/31/2006)
Fighting Government Waste
Related NewsHomeland SecurityPort security is vital to the safety of all Americans. Therefore, when a transaction involving the operations of U.S. ports is proposed, it should have been reviewed carefully, in strict compliance with the law and in close consultation with Congress. In this case, none of that happened. After the 62-2 vote in the House Appropriations Committee against the sale of port operations to DPW, it appears that Congressional concerns were finally acknowledged by the Bush Administration. As a result, on Thursday, March 9, 2006, DPW announced that despite their purchase of P&O;, they would “transfer” control of U.S. port operations to a “U.S. entity”. Further, on March 15, 2006, DPW clarified that the “American port operations will be sold as one group, and to a company that is clearly American controlled.” They also said that until such a sale could be finalized, the U.S. ports would continue to be independently operated by P&O.; Resolving this particular case does not, however, resolve the national security issues at our ports. We need to ensure that there is adequate funding and personnel to implement the necessary security measures, such as cargo screening, at all of our ports. Therefore, I have cosponsored the United States Seaport Multiyear Security Enhancement Act that increases funding for port security and creates a permanent port security grant program within the Department of Homeland Security. I will continue to work to ensure our ports are protected. Related NewsPolitics
I am an original cosponsor of H.R. 4682, a bill drafted by the Democratic leadership of the House that would enact stricter guidelines for ethical conduct. The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006 would tighten gift and travel rules; bar the practice of adding special interest provisions in the dead of night; toughen public disclosure of lobbying activities; mandate public disclosure of earmark sponsorship; extend the lobbying ban to two years; and prohibit cronyism and contracting abuses. The bill would also establish the House Office of Public Integrity to audit and investigate compliance with the new regulations. This legislation cannot undo the harm that corrupt politicians like those who did Jack Abramoff's bidding have inflicted, but it can make a statement that this conduct will not be tolerated. In the past year the House leadership has been plagued with scandal in some of this country's highest offices and this is unacceptable. Legislative action on these issues:Original cosponsor of HR 4682, the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act. Veterans
EnergyEnding America's dependence on oil - especially from the volatile Middle East and other foreign sources - is one of the most important issues facing our country today. Yet the Bush administration's energy policy, as reflected in the recent energy bills passed by Congress, is totally out of touch with our nation's environmental and security needs. By offering short term solutions for long term problems, the White House and the Republican leadership in Congress have missed a critical opportunity to help wean America from its dependence on oil and promote alternative energy sources. In 2005 the Republican-controlled Congress passed an energy bill that did little to ensure an energy independent future for our country. Although Republicans hailed it for "addressing" rising gasoline prices and our dependency on foreign oil, the bill actually did more to maintain the status quo. For example, the vast majority of tax incentives granted by the legislation will be doled out to traditional energy sources, such as oil, natural gas, nuclear power and electricity transmission, instead of renewable energy and conservation. Seeking to fill the gaps in its energy policy, the House leadership has embraced the drilling of oil in environmentally sensitive areas like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Championing such controversial and ineffective measures only emphasizes how out of touch their policy is with our nation's environmental and security needs. I strongly support raising CAFE standards, providing meaningful incentives for the production of hybrid, flexible fuel and other energy efficient vehicles, and doing more to encourage the use of public transportation. Legislative action on these issues
|
||
Congressman Howard Berman 2221 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Phone: 202-225-4695 Fax: 202-225-3196 | ||
toolbox | site map | privacy |