Senator Murkowski discusses health care issues with a reporter outside the Capitol
|
Stem Cells
Many people have contacted me to express their views regarding three
bills that the Senate voted on in July regarding stem cell research.
As there are strong feelings on both sides of the stem cell research
debate, I think it is important for me to explain my views.
The Senate operates under a process called “Unanimous Consent”
under which all Senators must give their consent for any particular
action, including scheduling time for votes on the Senate floor.
Under the Unanimous Consent agreement that was reached on stem
cell legislation, there were twelve hours of debate on each of
the three bills. No amendments to the bills were offered, and
each bill will required 60 votes to pass.
The most divisive of the three bills considered was H.R. 810,
the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act. This bill would permit
the Secretary of Health and Human Services to support research
that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, provided the embryos
were: (1) donated from in vitro fertilization clinics; (2) created
for the purposes of fertility treatment; (3) in excess of the
needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise
be discarded; and (4) donated by individuals with written informed
consent and without any financial or other inducements. I voted
for this legislation. H.R. 810 passed both the Senate and the
House and was sent to the President for his signature. The President,
however, vetoed this legislation.
S. 3504, the Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 2006, would prohibit
fetuses from being grown for research purposes. S. 2754, the Alternative
Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies Enhancement Act, requires the
Secretary of Health and Human Services to find ways to derive
human pluripotent stem cell lines using techniques that would
not harm embryos. I voted for both of these bills as well. While
S. 2754 did not pass the House, S. 3504 did pass the House and
the President signed this bill into law on July 19th, 2006.
I recently met with doctors and researchers from Johns Hopkins
University, one of the top medical research hospitals in the country,
to better understand the status of the current stem cell research,
as well as to understand how federal policies can promote or hinder
such research.
Research on adult stem cells is already being used to safely
and effectively treat more than 60 conditions and, most recently,
scientists reported new evidence of the effectiveness of treating
congestive heart failure with these cells. To date, umbilical
cord blood stem cell transplantation has been used successfully
to treat blood-related diseases such as leukemia and sickle cell
anemia. Some scientists believe, however, that the potential for
these cells is limited.
The potential for embryonic stem cell research is even greater
than that of adult or umbilical cord blood stem cells. Embryonic
stem cells have the ability to turn into various types of tissue,
including nerves and heart cells. The possibility that these cells
will provide cures for illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease,
Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and countless other diseases cannot
be ignored by the Federal Government. Under the President's leadership,
the Federal Government for the first time is funding embryonic
stem cell research; however, I believe we can do more. That is
why I supported legislation that will expand funding for all three
types of stem cell research – adult, cord, and embryonic.
It is imperative that the Federal Government pursue research
that holds such promise for the health and betterment of people
worldwide. I believe that we, as a government, must hold a firm
moral and ethical compass over such research. I am confident that
a balance can be reached between our duty to pursue life-saving
research and our duty to uphold a firm ethical code.
|